Paper · 1983 · Physiologia Plantarum

Effect of fertilization level on some physiological, morphological and growth characteristics of Ficus benjamina

R. Ceulemans; R. Gabriëls; I. Impens

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Young Ficus benjamina L. (weeping fig) plants were grown in perlite under low photon flux density regime in the greenhouse. Influence of seven fertilization levels – ranging from nutrient deficiency to saline conditions – on photosynthetic, morphological and growth characteristics was studied. The compensation point for photosynthetic photon flux density was minimal and the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis was maximal at a fertilization level with an electrical conductivity of 1.75 mS. Dark respiration was not affected by the level of fertilization. Chlorophyll content per unit leaf area increased while stomatal conductance slowly decreased with increasing fertilization level. Growth expressed in terms of either height, total dry weight or total leaf area attained an optimum at 1.75 mS, i.e. at the level where the compensation point for photon flux density and the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis were optimal. Leaf size and visible quality decreased at higher fertilizer levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The photosynthetic compensation point was minimal at 1.75 mS.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
a fertilization level with an electrical conductivity of 1.75 mSe0
Outcome
compensation point for photosynthetic photon flux densitye0
Direction
minimale0
Value
1.75 mSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The compensation point for photosynthetic photon flux density was minimal and the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis was maximal at a fertilization level with an electrical conductivity of 1.75 mS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quantum efficiency was maximal at 1.75 mS.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
a fertilization level with an electrical conductivity of 1.75 mSe0
Outcome
quantum efficiency of photosynthesise0
Direction
maximale0
Value
1.75 mSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The compensation point for photosynthetic photon flux density was minimal and the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis was maximal at a fertilization level with an electrical conductivity of 1.75 mS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization did not affect dark respiration.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
level of fertilizatione0
Outcome
Dark respiratione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark respiration was not affected by the level of fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content increased with fertilization.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
increasing fertilization levele0
Outcome
Chlorophyll content per unit leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll content per unit leaf area increased while stomatal conductance slowly decreased with increasing fertilization level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance decreased with fertilization.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
increasing fertilization levele0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll content per unit leaf area increased while stomatal conductance slowly decreased with increasing fertilization level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Height, dry weight and leaf area reached an optimum at 1.75 mS.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
1.75 mSe0
Outcome
height, total dry weight or total leaf areae0
Direction
optimume0
Value
1.75 mSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth expressed in terms of either height, total dry weight or total leaf area attained an optimum at 1.75 mS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf size and visible quality declined at higher fertilizer levels.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
higher fertilizer levelse0
Outcome
Leaf size and visible qualitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf size and visible quality decreased at higher fertilizer levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Ficus benjamina (weeping fig)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.