Paper · 2022 · Plant and Soil

Combination of humic biostimulants with a microbial inoculum improves lettuce productivity, nutrient uptake, and primary and secondary metabolism

Claudia Savarese; Vincenza Cozzolino; Mariavittoria Verrillo; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
63
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Biostimulants of natural origin represent a growing ecological strategy to increase crops productivity, especially when applied in combination with microbial bioeffectors. We studied the effect of biostimulants such as Potassium Humates (KH) from Leonardite and Compost Tea (CT) from green compost on both productivity and nutritional status of lettuce plants, as well as on the primary and secondary metabolism of treated plants, when amended either alone or in combination with a commercial microbial inoculum (M+), mainly based on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Micosat TabPlus). Results The biomass production as well as the uptake of both macro- and micronutrients by lettuce plants significantly increased when amended by the mixture of both humic materials (MIX) combined with the microbial inoculum. Similarly, the synergic MIX_M+ treatment significantly affected both the primary and secondary metabolism of lettuce more than their individual applications, by increasing, respectively, the biosynthesis of essential amino acids and carbohydrates, and that of antioxidant polyphenolic compounds, such as hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonols and coumarins. Conclusions Our findings suggest that a calibrated mixture of humic bioactive molecules in combination with microbial consortia represents a potential tool to improve crop productivity and its nutritional and metabolic status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce biomass production significantly increased with the humic MIX combined with the microbial inoculum.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
the mixture of both humic materials (MIX) combined with the microbial inoculume1
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2symbiont
Outcome
biomass productione1
Direction
significantly increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The biomass production as well as the uptake of both macro- and micronutrients by lettuce plants significantly increased when amended by the mixture of both humic materials (MIX) combined with the microbial inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–834 · show in text ↑
e2

“commercial microbial inoculum (M+), mainly based on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce uptake of macro- and micronutrients significantly increased with the humic MIX combined with the microbial inoculum.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
the mixture of both humic materials (MIX) combined with the microbial inoculume1
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie2symbiont
Outcome
uptake of both macro- and micronutrientse1
Direction
significantly increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The biomass production as well as the uptake of both macro- and micronutrients by lettuce plants significantly increased when amended by the mixture of both humic materials (MIX) combined with the microbial inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–834 · show in text ↑
e2

“commercial microbial inoculum (M+), mainly based on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The MIX_M+ treatment increased biosynthesis of essential amino acids and carbohydrates in lettuce more than the individual applications.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
MIX_M+ treatmente1
Outcome
biosynthesis of essential amino acids and carbohydratese1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
their individual applicationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the synergic MIX_M+ treatment significantly affected both the primary and secondary metabolism of lettuce more than their individual applications, by increasing, respectively, the biosynthesis of essential amino acids and carbohydrates, and that of antioxidant polyphenolic compounds, such as hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonols and coumarins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The MIX_M+ treatment increased antioxidant polyphenolic compounds (hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonols, coumarins) in lettuce more than the individual applications.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
MIX_M+ treatmente1
Outcome
antioxidant polyphenolic compoundse1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
their individual applicationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the synergic MIX_M+ treatment significantly affected both the primary and secondary metabolism of lettuce more than their individual applications, by increasing, respectively, the biosynthesis of essential amino acids and carbohydrates, and that of antioxidant polyphenolic compounds, such as hydroxycinnamic acids, flavonols and coumarins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1186 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A calibrated mixture of humic bioactive molecules with microbial consortia is a potential tool to improve crop productivity and nutritional and metabolic status.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
improve crop productivity and its nutritional and metabolic statuse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“a calibrated mixture of humic bioactive molecules in combination with microbial consortia represents a potential tool to improve crop productivity and its nutritional and metabolic status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1413 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

other · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.