Paper · 2022 · Horticulturae

A Sustainable Intercropping System for Organically Produced Lettuce and Green Onion with the Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inocula

Eleni Papoui; Filippos Bantis; Nikolaos Kapoulas; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are efficient for improving crop production and quality in organic farming systems. Our objective was to examine the effects of two AMF inocula, Rhizophagus intraradices and Diversispora spp., against a non-inoculated control on lettuce and green onion grown organically in an intercropping cropping system. At time of harvest, colonization levels were very low, and not different compared to the control that was colonized by the native mycorrhizal community. The yield of inoculated lettuce and green onion was unchanged, as also observed in the root system architecture analysis parameters. In both crops, color was not affected, limiting the possibility for consumers to reject the product. Nitrate accumulation was well below the limits set by European Commission in all treatments. Sugar, chlorophyll, K, Na and P contents were also quantified, showing no particular variations. In AMF-treated lettuce, important phytochemical characteristics, such as phenol content and ascorbic acid, showed a tendency for reduced values, while antioxidant capacity was significantly reduced by both AMF treatments. The study provides a description about the effect of AMF on two important co-cultivated crops. Research should be continued in order to determine best matches between plant material and AMF inocula that could result in enhanced production and nutritional quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonization at harvest was very low and no different from the native-colonized control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculat0
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizalt0symbiont
Outcome
colonization levelse0
Direction
not differente0
Qualifier
At time of harveste0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At time of harvest, colonization levels were very low, and not different compared to the control that was colonized by the native mycorrhizal community.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organically Produced Lettuce and Green Onion with the Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation left lettuce yield unchanged.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of inoculated lettuce and green onion was unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation left green onion yield unchanged.

Taxon
green onione0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of inoculated lettuce and green onion was unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root system architecture parameters were unchanged in the inoculated crops.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculat0
Outcome
root system architecture analysis parameterse0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of inoculated lettuce and green onion was unchanged, as also observed in the root system architecture analysis parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Organically Produced Lettuce and Green Onion with the Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Color was unaffected in both crops.

Taxon
Lettuce and Green Oniont0
Treatment
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculat0
Outcome
colore0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In both crops, color was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce and Green Onion with the Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate accumulation was below European Commission limits across treatments.

Taxon
Lettuce and Green Oniont0
Outcome
Nitrate accumulatione0
Direction
well belowe0
Qualifier
all treatmentse0
Comparator
the limits set by European Commissione0

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate accumulation was well below the limits set by European Commission in all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce and Green Onion with the Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar, chlorophyll and K contents showed no particular variation.

Taxon
Lettuce and Green Oniont0
Treatment
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculat0
Outcome
Sugar, chlorophyll, Ke0
Direction
no particular variationse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar, chlorophyll, K, Na and P contents were also quantified, showing no particular variations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce and Green Onion with the Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na and P contents showed no particular variation.

Taxon
Lettuce and Green Oniont0
Treatment
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inoculat0
Outcome
Na and P contentse0
Direction
no particular variationse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar, chlorophyll, K, Na and P contents were also quantified, showing no particular variations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce and Green Onion with the Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF-treated lettuce tended toward reduced phenol content and ascorbic acid.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
AMF-treatede0
Outcome
phenol content and ascorbic acide0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
a tendencye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In AMF-treated lettuce, important phytochemical characteristics, such as phenol content and ascorbic acid, showed a tendency for reduced values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both AMF treatments significantly reduced antioxidant capacity in lettuce.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
both AMF treatmentse0
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while antioxidant capacity was significantly reduced by both AMF treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce and Green Onion with the Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–130 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call for further research matching plant material to AMF inocula for production and nutritional quality.

Taxon
Lettuce and Green Oniont0
Outcome
best matches between plant material and AMF inoculae0
Qualifier
enhanced production and nutritional qualitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Research should be continued in order to determine best matches between plant material and AMF inocula that could result in enhanced production and nutritional quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce and Green Onion with the Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–130 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 24 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · disease · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 13 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 97 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.