Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Efficacy of Insecticides Against Pea Weevil Bruchus pisprum (L.) on Field Pea

Garuma Nemera Roge; Waktole Sori Gobena; Wakuma Bayissa Hundessa

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field pea Pisum sativum L. is an important legume crop in Ethiopia and insect pests are the major constraints in its production. Amongst these pea weevil Bruchus pisorum L. is important. This study evaluates the effects of lambda cyhalothrin (Karate 50EC), chlorantraniliprole (Coragen 200SC) and carbaryl (Sevin 85WP) under field conditions at the Holetta Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia. The insecticides were applied at flowering, pod setting and both at flowering and pod setting stages, using the susceptible variety ‘Burkitu’ in randomized complete block design. The results revealed that there was no significant difference among the treatments. Similarly, insecticide application frequency and crop phenology had no effect on the incidence of egg and larvae in field, and on adult emergence under storage conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide treatments did not differ significantly.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
difference among the treatmentse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field pea Pisum sativum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application frequency and crop phenology had no effect on field egg and larval incidence.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
insecticide application frequency and crop phenologye0
Outcome
incidence of egg and larvae in fielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insecticide application frequency and crop phenology had no effect on the incidence of egg and larvae in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field pea Pisum sativum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application frequency and crop phenology had no effect on adult emergence in storage.

Taxon
Pisum sativum L.Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
insecticide application frequency and crop phenologye0
Outcome
adult emergencee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insecticide application frequency and crop phenology had no effect on the incidence of egg and larvae in field, and on adult emergence under storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field pea Pisum sativum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑

insecticide · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · pest · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.