Abstract
Bioefficacy of 12 insecticides viz., monocrotophos 0.04%, endosulfan 0.07%, quinalphos 0.05%, malathion 0.05%, car-baryl 0.15%, chlorpyriphos 0.05%, cypermethrin 0.006%, deltamethrin 0.002%, fluvalinate 0.008%, fenvalerate 0.006%, triazophos 0.06% and Neem 0.5% against pod borer complex of field pea, Pisum sativum L. was studied for two consequent Rabi seasons. All the insecticides were found effective in controlling pod borers and reduced pod damage from 10.28 to 19.73% as compared to 41.48% in control. Fenvalerate treated plots registered the highest yield (25.34 qfta) followed by cypermethrin (24.07 q/ha). The synthetic pyrethroids were better than other treatments in checking yield loss due to insect-pests but were at par with endosulfan and quinalphos.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
All 12 insecticides reduced pod damage by pod borers in field pea to 10.28-19.73% versus 41.48% in the control.
Verbatim
e0“pod borer complex of field pea”
e1“All the insecticides were found effective in controlling pod borers and reduced pod damage from 10.28 to 19.73% as compared to 41.48% in control”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenvalerate-treated plots gave the highest yield of field pea, 25.34 q/ha.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“pod borer complex of field pea”
e2“Fenvalerate treated plots registered the highest yield (25.34 qfta)”
Claim · model-written summary
Synthetic pyrethroids were better than other treatments in limiting yield loss due to insect pests in field pea.
Verbatim
e0“pod borer complex of field pea”
e3“The synthetic pyrethroids were better than other treatments in checking yield loss due to insect-pests”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · pest · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.