Paper · 1982 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

The Effect of Supplemental High Pressure Sodium Lighting and Nutrition on Vegetative Growth and Flowering of ‘White Marble’ and ‘Improved Mefo’ Cut Chrysanthemums1

Becky R. Hughes; M. J. Tsujita

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cvs. White Marble and Improved Mefo were rooted and grown in cell paks for 34 days under ambient light plus: photoperiodic incandescent night-break lighting 2μE (m −2 s −1 ); 64 μE m −2 s −1 high pressure sodium (HPS) dusk to dawn lighting; or 126 μE m −2 s −1 HPS dusk to dawn lighting. Container-grown chrysanthemums were fertilized with either 200 ppm N, 86 ppm P and 166 ppm K or 300 ppm N, 129 ppm P and 249 ppm K with every irrigation. After 34 long days these plants were transplanted into raised beds, immediately given short day conditions, and treated as a normal commercial crop. The container-grown treatments were compared to each other and to a bench-grown control which received a total of 48 long days. Supplemental HPS lighting increased the net assimilation rate (NAR), plant dry weight, and height of ‘White Marble’ chrysanthemums after 4 weeks. Increased fertility increased NAR and dry weight in the supplemental light treatment but not in the ambient light treatment. Results were less obvious for “Improved Mefo’. The container-grown treatments were ready for harvest 14 to 22 days before the controls. In both cultivars the high light-high fertility treatment was superior to the other container-grown treatments. The ‘White Marble’ high light-high fertility treatment produced higher quality chrysanthemums than the control, while the same ‘Improved Mefo’ treatment produced chrysanthemums slightly inferior to the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPS lighting increased net assimilation rate, dry weight, and height in White Marble after four weeks.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemume0
Material
‘White Marble’e0
Treatment
Supplemental HPS lightinge0
Outcome
net assimilation rate (NAR), plant dry weight, and heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplemental HPS lighting increased the net assimilation rate (NAR), plant dry weight, and height of ‘White Marble’ chrysanthemums after 4 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased fertility increased NAR and dry weight with supplemental light.

Taxon
Chrysanthemum morifoliumChrysanthemum ×morifoliumt0
Treatment
Increased fertilitye0
Outcome
NAR and dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
supplemental light treatmente0
Comparator
ambient light treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum x morifolium
Chrysanthemum ×morifolium · Taxon池田正樹 ( talk )masaki ikeda · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased fertility increased NAR and dry weight in the supplemental light treatment but not in the ambient light treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum morifolium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased fertility did not increase NAR and dry weight under ambient light.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Increased fertilitye0
Outcome
NAR and dry weighte0
Direction
note0
Comparator
ambient light treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased fertility increased NAR and dry weight in the supplemental light treatment but not in the ambient light treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Results were less obvious for Improved Mefo.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Material
“Improved Mefo’e0
Outcome
less obviouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results were less obvious for “Improved Mefo’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Container grown treatments reached harvest 14 to 22 days before controls.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
container-grown treatmentse0
Outcome
ready for harveste0
Direction
beforee0
Value
14 to 22 dayse0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The container-grown treatments were ready for harvest 14 to 22 days before the controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high light and high fertility treatment was superior in both cultivars.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
high light-high fertility treatmente0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other container-grown treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both cultivars the high light-high fertility treatment was superior to the other container-grown treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High light and high fertility improved White Marble quality over control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemume0
Material
‘White Marble’e0
Treatment
high light-high fertility treatmente0
Outcome
quality chrysanthemumse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ‘White Marble’ high light-high fertility treatment produced higher quality chrysanthemums than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment yielded slightly inferior Improved Mefo chrysanthemums relative to control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemume0
Material
‘Improved Mefo’e0
Treatment
the same ‘Improved Mefo’ treatmente0
Outcome
chrysanthemums slightly inferiore0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the same ‘Improved Mefo’ treatment produced chrysanthemums slightly inferior to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1489 · show in text ↑

sodium atom · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

63 papers: 47 positive, 16 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

light · quality: general · ChrysanthemumResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.