Abstract
Abstract This study was carried out in the field during the two winter seasons (2020-2019) and (2021-2020) in the experimental field of the College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences-University of Baghdad (Al-Jadriya), with the aim of improving the efficiency and productivity of the vegetative growth characteristics of cumin (Turkish variety) under the influence of Iraqi conditions. The experiment included a two-factor study, the first with four levels of biofertilizers (without vaccine, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Azospirillum brasilense and the mixture between the two fertilizers), and the second with a combination of five levels that included two treatments (15 and 30 ml L -1 ) each of coconut endosperm fluid and tryptophan with One metering treatment for both (spray with distilled water only). The experiment was carried out by arranging the split panels according to a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results of the study showed the superiority of plants treated with the spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizers in the height of the main stem (27.53 and 29.33 cm), the number of main branches (9.13 and 9.67 plant branches -1 ) and the dry weight of the vegetative (9.99 and 9.99 9.96 g plant -1 ), fresh weight of the vegetative (20.55 and 43.95 g plant -1 ), relative growth rate (0.044 and 0.050 g -1 day -1 ), crop growth rate (1.903 and 2.292 g m 2 day -1 ) and leaves of total chlorophyll (0.052 and 0.047 mg 100 g -2 of fresh weight) compared to uncontaminated and unsprayed plants for both seasons, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved main stem height to 27.53 and 29.33 cm.
- Taxon
- cumin
Cuminum cyminumt0 - Material
- Turkish varietye2
- Treatment
- spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- height of the main steme0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 27.53 and 29.33 cme0
- Comparator
- uncontaminated and unsprayed plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of plants treated with the spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizers in the height of the main stem (27.53 and 29.33 cm)”
t0“Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)”
e1“compared to uncontaminated and unsprayed plants for both seasons, respectively”
e2“cumin (Turkish variety)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved main branch number to 9.13 and 9.67 branches per plant.
- Taxon
- cuminCuminum cyminumt0
- Material
- Turkish varietye2
- Treatment
- spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- number of main branchese0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 9.13 and 9.67 plant branches -1e0
- Comparator
- uncontaminated and unsprayed plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of plants treated with the spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizers in the height of the main stem (27.53 and 29.33 cm), the number of main branches (9.13 and 9.67 plant branches -1 )”
t0“Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)”
e1“compared to uncontaminated and unsprayed plants for both seasons, respectively”
e2“cumin (Turkish variety)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved vegetative dry weight.
- Taxon
- cuminCuminum cyminumt0
- Material
- Turkish varietye2
- Treatment
- spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- dry weight of the vegetativee0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 9.99 and 9.99 9.96 g plant -1e0
- Comparator
- uncontaminated and unsprayed plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of plants treated with the spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizers in the height of the main stem (27.53 and 29.33 cm), the number of main branches (9.13 and 9.67 plant branches -1 ) and the dry weight of the vegetative (9.99 and 9.99 9.96 g plant -1 )”
t0“Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)”
e1“compared to uncontaminated and unsprayed plants for both seasons, respectively”
e2“cumin (Turkish variety)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved vegetative fresh weight.
- Taxon
- cuminCuminum cyminumt0
- Material
- Turkish varietye2
- Treatment
- spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- fresh weight of the vegetativee0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 20.55 and 43.95 g plant -1e0
- Comparator
- uncontaminated and unsprayed plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of plants treated with the spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizers in the height of the main stem (27.53 and 29.33 cm), the number of main branches (9.13 and 9.67 plant branches -1 ) and the dry weight of the vegetative (9.99 and 9.99 9.96 g plant -1 ), fresh weight of the vegetative (20.55 and 43.95 g plant -1 )”
t0“Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)”
e1“compared to uncontaminated and unsprayed plants for both seasons, respectively”
e2“cumin (Turkish variety)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved relative growth rate.
- Taxon
- cuminCuminum cyminumt0
- Material
- Turkish varietye2
- Treatment
- spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- relative growth ratee0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 0.044 and 0.050 g -1 day -1e0
- Comparator
- uncontaminated and unsprayed plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of plants treated with the spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizers in the height of the main stem (27.53 and 29.33 cm), the number of main branches (9.13 and 9.67 plant branches -1 ) and the dry weight of the vegetative (9.99 and 9.99 9.96 g plant -1 ), fresh weight of the vegetative (20.55 and 43.95 g plant -1 ), relative growth rate (0.044 and 0.050 g -1 day -1 )”
t0“Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)”
e1“compared to uncontaminated and unsprayed plants for both seasons, respectively”
e2“cumin (Turkish variety)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved crop growth rate.
- Taxon
- cuminCuminum cyminumt0
- Material
- Turkish varietye2
- Treatment
- spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- crop growth ratee0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 1.903 and 2.292 g m 2 day -1e0
- Comparator
- uncontaminated and unsprayed plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of plants treated with the spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizers in the height of the main stem (27.53 and 29.33 cm), the number of main branches (9.13 and 9.67 plant branches -1 ) and the dry weight of the vegetative (9.99 and 9.99 9.96 g plant -1 ), fresh weight of the vegetative (20.55 and 43.95 g plant -1 ), relative growth rate (0.044 and 0.050 g -1 day -1 ), crop growth rate (1.903 and 2.292 g m 2 day -1 )”
t0“Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)”
e1“compared to uncontaminated and unsprayed plants for both seasons, respectively”
e2“cumin (Turkish variety)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved leaf total chlorophyll.
- Taxon
- cuminCuminum cyminumt0
- Material
- Turkish varietye2
- Treatment
- spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- leaves of total chlorophylle0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Value
- 0.052 and 0.047 mg 100 g -2 of fresh weighte0
- Comparator
- uncontaminated and unsprayed plantse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“superiority of plants treated with the spray combination (30 ml -1 each) in the presence of the mixture between the two fertilizers in the height of the main stem (27.53 and 29.33 cm), the number of main branches (9.13 and 9.67 plant branches -1 ) and the dry weight of the vegetative (9.99 and 9.99 9.96 g plant -1 ), fresh weight of the vegetative (20.55 and 43.95 g plant -1 ), relative growth rate (0.044 and 0.050 g -1 day -1 ), crop growth rate (1.903 and 2.292 g m 2 day -1 ) and leaves of total chlorophyll (0.052 and 0.047 mg 100 g -2 of fresh weight)”
t0“Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)”
e1“compared to uncontaminated and unsprayed plants for both seasons, respectively”
e2“cumin (Turkish variety)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · physiology: pigments · Cuminum cyminum (cumin)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · physiology: pigments · Cuminum cyminum (cumin)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · growth · Cuminum cyminum (cumin)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · growth · Cuminum cyminum (cumin)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.