Paper · 2022 · Nature Food

Time management governs climate resilience and productivity in the coupled rice–wheat cropping systems of eastern India

Andrew J. McDonald; Balwinder-Singh; Alwin Keil; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
92
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

India will need to produce 30% more wheat by 2050, and these gains must principally come from intensification in eastern India where low productivity is common. Through a dense network of on-farm surveys for the rice-wheat system in this region, we show that contemporary wheat sowing dates have a central influence on achieved and attainable yields, superseding all other crop management, soil and varietal factors. We estimate that untapped wheat production potential will increase by 69% with achievable adjustments to wheat sowing dates without incurring undesirable trade-offs with rice productivity, irrigation requirements or profitability. Our findings also indicate that transformative gains in wheat yields are only possible in eastern India if rice and wheat are managed as a coupled system. Steps taken to 'keep time' through better management of the annual cropping calendar will pay dividends for food security, profitability and climate resilience now and as a foundation for adaptation to progressive climate change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sowing date had the strongest influence on achieved and attainable yields among surveyed factors.

Treatment
wheat sowing datese0
Outcome
achieved and attainable yieldse0
Setting
eastern Indiae1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contemporary wheat sowing dates have a central influence on achieved and attainable yields, superseding all other crop management, soil and varietal factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–415 · show in text ↑
e1

“intensification in eastern India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Achievable wheat sowing-date adjustments were estimated to increase untapped wheat production potential by 69%.

Treatment
achievable adjustments to wheat sowing datese0
Outcome
untapped wheat production potentiale0
Direction
increasee0
Value
69%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“untapped wheat production potential will increase by 69% with achievable adjustments to wheat sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated sowing adjustments did not incur adverse trade-offs with rice productivity.

Treatment
adjustments to wheat sowing datese1
Outcome
rice productivitye0
Direction
without incurring undesirable trade-offse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without incurring undesirable trade-offs with rice productivity, irrigation requirements or profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“achievable adjustments to wheat sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated sowing adjustments did not incur adverse irrigation trade-offs.

Treatment
adjustments to wheat sowing datese1
Outcome
irrigation requirementse0
Direction
without incurring undesirable trade-offse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without incurring undesirable trade-offs with rice productivity, irrigation requirements or profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“achievable adjustments to wheat sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated sowing adjustments did not incur adverse profitability trade-offs.

Treatment
adjustments to wheat sowing datese1
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
without incurring undesirable trade-offse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without incurring undesirable trade-offs with rice productivity, irrigation requirements or profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“achievable adjustments to wheat sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Transformative wheat yield gains require managing rice and wheat as a coupled system in eastern India.

Outcome
managed as a coupled systeme0
Setting
eastern Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transformative gains in wheat yields are only possible in eastern India if rice and wheat are managed as a coupled system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–801 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend better annual cropping-calendar management for food security, profitability and climate resilience.

Outcome
better management of the annual cropping calendare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Steps taken to 'keep time' through better management of the annual cropping calendar will pay dividends for food security, profitability and climate resilience”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 110 positive, 14 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

sowing time · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 123 positive, 70 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.