Paper · 2022 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Impact of climatic abnormities and mitigating technologies on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in central India

Y P SINGH

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A study was carried out on changes in climate; area and productivity of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) over aperiod of three decades (1982–2016), and impact of climatic abnormalities and mitigation technologies on yield andeconomic benefits was seen. Long-term data on climate change showed that there is a trend of minimum and maximum temperature rise and a decrease in monthly total rainfall in summer and rainy season, while it increases in winter. Study also revealed the prominent disparity in area and productivity of pigeonpea of all agro-climatic zones of Madhya Pradesh (MP) and Chhattisgarh (CG). The absolute change (AC) and relative change (RC) in area of pigeonpea in MP and CG states increased by 34.66 thousand ha and 16.2% and increased productivity by 243.3 kg/ha and 65.4% compared with base years, respectively. Like-wise maximum AC in productivity was at Central Narmada Valley (CNV) and minimum at CG plains, while RC in productivity was maximum increased in Gird region and minimum in CG plains compared to base years. The crop sowing on bed with broad bed furrow (BBF) increased seed yield by 18.2% compared to flat land sowing method. The Fusarium wilt infestation was reduced with resistant cultivar along with seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum and BBF sowing impacting on yield by 26.2%, whereas increased by 20.7% with control of phytophthora blight resistant cultivar sowing on BBF after seed treatment with Trichoderma viride, compared with existing practices (EP). Similarly control of pod borer with the use of IPM technology enhanced seed yield by 42.2% compared with EP. Results showed that adoption of improved techniques for mitigation of climatic abnormalities gave higher productivity, net returns and B:C ratio compared to EP.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea area in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh rose by 34.66 thousand hectares and 16.2% relative to base years.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34.66 thousand ha and 16.2%e0
Setting
MP and CG statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“area of pigeonpea in MP and CG states increased by 34.66 thousand ha and 16.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–736 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea productivity rose by 243.3 kg/ha and 65.4% relative to base years.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
243.3 kg/ha and 65.4%e0
Comparator
base yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased productivity by 243.3 kg/ha and 65.4% compared with base years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Central Narmada Valley had the maximum absolute productivity change and Chhattisgarh plains the minimum.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
AC in productivitye0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
Central Narmada Valley (CNV) and minimum at CG plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum AC in productivity was at Central Narmada Valley (CNV) and minimum at CG plains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gird region had the maximum relative productivity increase, while Chhattisgarh plains had the minimum.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
RC in productivitye0
Direction
maximum increasede0
Setting
Gird region and minimum in CG plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RC in productivity was maximum increased in Gird region and minimum in CG plains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad bed furrow sowing increased pigeonpea seed yield by 18.2% over flat sowing.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
broad bed furrow (BBF)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.2%e0
Comparator
flat land sowing methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop sowing on bed with broad bed furrow (BBF) increased seed yield by 18.2% compared to flat land sowing method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant cultivar, Trichoderma harzianum seed treatment, and BBF sowing reduced Fusarium wilt and increased yield 26.2%.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
resistant cultivar along with seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum and BBF sowinge0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Fusarium wilt infestatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
26.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium wilt infestation was reduced with resistant cultivar along with seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum and BBF sowing impacting on yield by 26.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytophthora blight control with resistant cultivar, Trichoderma viride, and BBF raised yield by 20.7%.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
resistant cultivar sowing on BBF after seed treatment with Trichoderma viridee0
Interactor
phytophthoraPhytophthorae0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control of phytophthora blighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.7%e0
Comparator
existing practices (EP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased by 20.7% with control of phytophthora blight resistant cultivar sowing on BBF after seed treatment with Trichoderma viride, compared with existing practices (EP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM pod borer control raised pigeonpea seed yield by 42.2% over existing practices.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
IPM technologye0
Interactor
pod borere0pest
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
42.2%e0
Comparator
EPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of pod borer with the use of IPM technology enhanced seed yield by 42.2% compared with EP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved mitigation techniques produced higher productivity, net returns, and benefit-cost ratio than existing practices.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
improved techniques for mitigation of climatic abnormalitiese0
Outcome
productivity, net returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
EPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adoption of improved techniques for mitigation of climatic abnormalities gave higher productivity, net returns and B:C ratio compared to EP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1769 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–87 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma harzianum · Fusarium · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

climate site · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

ipm · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

irrigation · Fusarium · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · Phytophthora · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

51 papers: 51 positive, 0 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.