Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Different Land Configuration Techniques on Fusarium Wilt of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)

R.L. Sharma; V.K. Swarnkar; Khirod Barik; et al.

13
claims
34
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted during Kharif season of year 2017 at farmers’ field of Raipur district of Chhattisgarh Plains to find out effect of different land configuration techniques on Fusarium wilt of pigeonpea as well as growth, yield and yield attributes of pigeonpea. All treatment had significant effect on wilt disease incidence, growth, yield, yield attributing characters like plant height, number of branches plant-1, number of pods plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, 100 seed weight, seed yield, straw yield, harvest index and disease index. T1 – Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing resulted in lower wilt incidence at 60 DAS (2.90 per cent) and 150 DAS (9.18 per cent), higher plant height (182.98 cm), number of branches plant-1 (17.97), number of pods plant-1 (147.67), number of seeds pod-1 (3.55), 100 seed weight (10.24 g), seed yield (16.91 q ha-1), straw yield (44.31 q ha-1) and harvest index (27.62 per cent), respectively and was found superior over rest of the treatments, which was followed by T2 – flat bed method of spacing 90 x 20 cm and T3 – flat bed method of spacing 60 x 20 cm. The maximum wilt incidence at 60 DAS and 150 DAS was associated with crop sown broadcasted (8.36 and 30.93 per cent, respectively). Also, the minimum value of all above growth, yield and yield attributing characters was recorded with control plot i.e. broadcast method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting lowered wilt incidence at 60 days.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacinge0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
wilt incidence at 60 DASe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
2.90 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 – Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing resulted in lower wilt incidence at 60 DAS (2.90 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting lowered wilt incidence at 150 days.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacinge0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
wilt incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
9.18 per cente0
Qualifier
150 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 – Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing resulted in lower wilt incidence at 60 DAS (2.90 per cent) and 150 DAS (9.18 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting produced higher plant height.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacinge1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
182.98 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher plant height (182.98 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–735 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting produced more branches per plant.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacinge1
Outcome
number of branches plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.97e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher plant height (182.98 cm), number of branches plant-1 (17.97)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–771 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting produced more pods per plant.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacinge1
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
highere1
Value
147.67e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods plant-1 (147.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–804 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing resulted in lower wilt incidence at 60 DAS (2.90 per cent) and 150 DAS (9.18 per cent), higher plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting produced more seeds per pod.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacinge1
Outcome
number of seeds pod-1e0
Direction
highere1
Value
3.55e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of seeds pod-1 (3.55)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–834 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing resulted in lower wilt incidence at 60 DAS (2.90 per cent) and 150 DAS (9.18 per cent), higher plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting increased 100 seed weight.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacinge1
Outcome
100 seed weighte0
Direction
highere1
Value
10.24 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100 seed weight (10.24 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing resulted in lower wilt incidence at 60 DAS (2.90 per cent) and 150 DAS (9.18 per cent), higher plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting increased seed yield.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacinge1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
16.91 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (16.91 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing resulted in lower wilt incidence at 60 DAS (2.90 per cent) and 150 DAS (9.18 per cent), higher plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting increased straw yield.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacinge1
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere1
Value
44.31 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (44.31 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing resulted in lower wilt incidence at 60 DAS (2.90 per cent) and 150 DAS (9.18 per cent), higher plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow planting increased harvest index.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacinge1
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere1
Value
27.62 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index (27.62 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–951 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ridge and furrow method with 90 x 20 cm spacing resulted in lower wilt incidence at 60 DAS (2.90 per cent) and 150 DAS (9.18 per cent), higher plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast sowing had maximum wilt incidence at 60 days.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
crop sown broadcastede0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
wilt incidence at 60 DASe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.36e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum wilt incidence at 60 DAS and 150 DAS was associated with crop sown broadcasted (8.36 and 30.93 per cent, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1261 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast sowing had maximum wilt incidence at 150 days.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
crop sown broadcastede0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
wilt incidence at 60 DAS and 150 DASe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
30.93 per cente0
Qualifier
150 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum wilt incidence at 60 DAS and 150 DAS was associated with crop sown broadcasted (8.36 and 30.93 per cent, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1261 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium Wilt of Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast control plots had minimum growth and yield traits.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
broadcast methode0
Outcome
growth, yield and yield attributing characterse0
Direction
minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum value of all above growth, yield and yield attributing characters was recorded with control plot i.e. broadcast method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

density · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 49 positive, 3 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

irrigation · Fusarium · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

51 papers: 51 positive, 0 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.