Paper · 2022 · Plants

Root-Zone Heat Priming Effects on Maximum Quantum Efficiency of PSII, Productivity, Root Morphology and Nutritional Quality of Two Aeroponically Grown Leafy Greens in a Tropical Greenhouse

Jie He; Cassander Tan; Lin Qin

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of root zone (RZ) heat priming on Eruca sativa (cv. Arugula) and Lactuca sativa (cv. Canasta) in a tropical greenhouse by exposing them to three different RZ temperatures (RZTs). For the first group, plants were grown at 25 °C-RZT for 36 days. The second group of plants was grown at 25 °C-RZT for 10 days before transferring to 38 °C-RZT for 10 days and then to 42 °C-RZT for another 16 days (primed). For the third group, plants were grown at 25 °C-RZT for 20 days and for the last 16 days were transferred to 42 °C-RZT (non-primed). RZ heat priming did not affect the leaf expansion of Arugula while the leaf expansion was slower in RZ heat primed Canasta compared to 25 °C-RZT plants. After transferring to 42 °C-RZT in the later stage, RZ heat primed Arugula had similar productivity but a larger root system with higher nutritional quality at harvest and during postharvest storage compared to those of 25 °C-RZT plants. After subjection to 42 °C-RZT, although RZ heat priming enhanced its nutritional quality, the productivity of Canasta was compromised. The results of this study suggest that it is feasible to enhance productivity and nutritional quality of leafy greens at lower production cost through RZT management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming did not affect Arugula leaf expansion relative to 25 °C plants.

Material
Arugulae0
Treatment
RZ heat priminge0
Outcome
leaf expansione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Eruca sativa (cv. Arugula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“RZ heat priming did not affect the leaf expansion of Arugula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming slowed Canasta leaf expansion relative to 25 °C plants.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Material
Canastae0
Treatment
RZ heat primede0
Outcome
leaf expansione0
Direction
slowere0
Comparator
25 °C-RZT plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf expansion was slower in RZ heat primed Canasta compared to 25 °C-RZT plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lactuca sativa (cv. Canasta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed Arugula had similar productivity to 25 °C plants after transfer to 42 °C.

Material
Arugulae0
Treatment
RZ heat primede0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
25 °C-RZT plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Eruca sativa (cv. Arugula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“RZ heat primed Arugula had similar productivity but a larger root system with higher nutritional quality at harvest and during postharvest storage compared to those of 25 °C-RZT plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed Arugula had a larger root system than 25 °C plants.

Material
Arugulae0
Treatment
RZ heat primede0
Outcome
root systeme0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
25 °C-RZT plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Eruca sativa (cv. Arugula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“RZ heat primed Arugula had similar productivity but a larger root system with higher nutritional quality at harvest and during postharvest storage compared to those of 25 °C-RZT plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed Arugula had higher nutritional quality at harvest and during storage.

Material
Arugulae0
Treatment
RZ heat primede0
Outcome
nutritional qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at harvest and during postharvest storagee0
Comparator
25 °C-RZT plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa
Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa · TaxonLeo Michels · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Eruca sativa (cv. Arugula)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“RZ heat primed Arugula had similar productivity but a larger root system with higher nutritional quality at harvest and during postharvest storage compared to those of 25 °C-RZT plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming enhanced Canasta nutritional quality after 42 °C exposure.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Material
Canastae0
Treatment
RZ heat priminge0
Outcome
nutritional qualitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa (cv. Canasta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“After subjection to 42 °C-RZT, although RZ heat priming enhanced its nutritional quality, the productivity of Canasta was compromised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canasta productivity was compromised after root-zone heat priming.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativat0
Material
Canastae0
Treatment
RZ heat priminge0
Outcome
productivity of Canastae0
Direction
compromisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa (cv. Canasta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“After subjection to 42 °C-RZT, although RZ heat priming enhanced its nutritional quality, the productivity of Canasta was compromised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1096 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest root-zone temperature management can improve productivity and quality at lower cost.

Taxon
leafy greense0
Outcome
enhance productivity and nutritional quality of leafy greens at lower production cost through RZT managemente0

Verbatim

e0

“it is feasible to enhance productivity and nutritional quality of leafy greens at lower production cost through RZT management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1263 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · quality: grain · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

heat · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

heat · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 7 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 46 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

heat · growth · Eruca vesicariaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Eruca vesicariaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.