Paper · 2022 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Effect of procyanidin and chitosan treatments on quality and senescence of ‘Williams’ banana fruit during ripening

Mohamed A. Awad; Adel D. Al-Qurashi; Mohamed I. Elsayed; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Banana fruit undergoes rapid metabolic changes following ripening that limit shelf life and marketability. The response of pre-climacteric ‘Williams’ bananas to exogenous 1% procyanindin (PN) and 1% chitosan (CT) either alone or in combination treatments during ripening at ambient conditions was evaluated. PN and CT treatments retained quality and delayed senescence as shown by greener peel, higher firmness and titratable acidity (TA), but lower total soluble solids (TSS) and TSS/TA ratio, weight loss, browning and electrolyte leakage than the control. Total phenol (TPC) and flavonoid contents (TFC) in both peel and pulp increased up to 6 days, then decreased and was higher in treated fruit than the control. Vitamin C content in fruit pulp decreased up to 3 days, then increased and was higher in treated fruit than the control. Radical scavenging capacity (RSC) of peel and pulp increased up to day 6, then decreased and was higher in treated fruit than the control. The treated fruit exhibited lower polyphenoloxidase (PPO), and hydrolytic enzymes but higher peroxidase (POD) activities in both peel and pulp than control. The combined treatment of PN and CT could be used to extend the shelf life of ‘Williams’ bananas for up to four more days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PN and CT retained banana peel greenness, firmness and titratable acidity relative to control.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
‘Williams’t0
Treatment
PN and CT treatmentse0
Outcome
peel, higher firmness and titratable aciditye0
Direction
greener peel, highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“PN and CT treatments retained quality and delayed senescence as shown by greener peel, higher firmness and titratable acidity (TA), but lower total soluble solids (TSS) and TSS/TA ratio, weight loss, browning and electrolyte leakage than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Williams’ banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PN and CT lowered soluble solids, TSS/TA ratio and weight loss relative to control.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
PN and CT treatmentse1
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS) and TSS/TA ratio, weight losse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“lower total soluble solids (TSS) and TSS/TA ratio, weight loss, browning and electrolyte leakage than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–557 · show in text ↑
e1

“PN and CT treatments retained quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Williams’ banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PN and CT reduced browning and electrolyte leakage relative to control.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
PN and CT treatmentse1
Outcome
browning and electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“lower total soluble solids (TSS) and TSS/TA ratio, weight loss, browning and electrolyte leakage than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–557 · show in text ↑
e1

“PN and CT treatments retained quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Williams’ banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenol and flavonoid contents of peel and pulp peaked at six days and were higher in treated fruit.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
Total phenol (TPC) and flavonoid contents (TFC)e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
increased up to 6 days, then decreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenol (TPC) and flavonoid contents (TFC) in both peel and pulp increased up to 6 days, then decreased and was higher in treated fruit than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Williams’ banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulp vitamin C decreased until day three, then rose and was higher in treated fruit.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
Vitamin C content in fruit pulpe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
decreased up to 3 days, then increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Vitamin C content in fruit pulp decreased up to 3 days, then increased and was higher in treated fruit than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Williams’ banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peel and pulp scavenging capacity peaked at day six and was higher with treatment.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
Radical scavenging capacity (RSC) of peel and pulpe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
increased up to day 6, then decreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Radical scavenging capacity (RSC) of peel and pulp increased up to day 6, then decreased and was higher in treated fruit than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Williams’ banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated peel and pulp had lower polyphenoloxidase and hydrolytic enzyme activities.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
polyphenoloxidase (PPO), and hydrolytic enzymese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The treated fruit exhibited lower polyphenoloxidase (PPO), and hydrolytic enzymes but higher peroxidase (POD) activities in both peel and pulp than control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Williams’ banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated peel and pulp had higher peroxidase activity.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
treated fruite1
Outcome
peroxidase (POD) activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“higher peroxidase (POD) activities in both peel and pulp than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treated fruit exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Williams’ banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined PN and CT to extend Williams banana shelf life by up to four days.

Taxon
‘Williams’ bananase0
Treatment
combined treatment of PN and CTe0
Outcome
extend the shelf lifee0
Value
up to four more dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatment of PN and CT could be used to extend the shelf life of ‘Williams’ bananas for up to four more days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1257 · show in text ↑

chitosan · physiology: oxidative · MusaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · MusaResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.