Paper · 2009 · Journal of Farm Sciences

Management of sucking pests in cotton with new insecticides.

S. S. Udikeri; S. B. Patil; R. B. Hirekurubar; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Bioefficacy studies were carried out at Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad, for sucking pests of cotton with BY1 08330 150 OD (spirotetramat 150 OD) and SYN 13623 a combiproduct of thiomethoxam 141 SC+λcyhalothrin 106 SC. The population of thrips, leafhoppers and aphids was brought below ETL with three sprays during 2006 and two sprays in 2007 with different dosages of new chemicals. Significantly highest seed cotton yield of 20.32q/ha (2006) and 29.22 q/ha (2007) was harvested with higher dosage of SYN 13623 @ 300ml/ha and BY1 08330 150 OD @500ml/ha respectively proving them to be on par with acetamiprid 20 SP, a standard check.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three sprays brought thrips below ETL in 2006.

Treatment
three sprayse0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
population of thripse0
Direction
belowe0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The population of thrips, leafhoppers and aphids was brought below ETL with three sprays during 2006 and two sprays in 2007 with different dosages of new chemicals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays brought leafhoppers below ETL.

Treatment
three sprays during 2006 and two sprays in 2007e0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
leafhopperse0
Direction
belowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The population of thrips, leafhoppers and aphids was brought below ETL with three sprays during 2006 and two sprays in 2007 with different dosages of new chemicals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays brought aphids below ETL.

Treatment
three sprays during 2006 and two sprays in 2007e0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphidse0
Direction
belowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The population of thrips, leafhoppers and aphids was brought below ETL with three sprays during 2006 and two sprays in 2007 with different dosages of new chemicals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SYN 13623 at 300ml/ha gave the significantly highest seed cotton yield in 2006, 20.32q/ha, on par with acetamiprid.

Treatment
SYN 13623 @ 300ml/hae0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
20.32q/hae0
Qualifier
2006e0
Comparator
acetamiprid 20 SPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly highest seed cotton yield of 20.32q/ha (2006) and 29.22 q/ha (2007) was harvested with higher dosage of SYN 13623 @ 300ml/ha and BY1 08330 150 OD @500ml/ha respectively proving them to be on par with acetamiprid 20 SP, a standard check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BY1 08330 150 OD at 500ml/ha gave the significantly highest seed cotton yield in 2007, 29.22 q/ha, on par with acetamiprid.

Treatment
BY1 08330 150 OD @500ml/hae0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
29.22 q/hae0
Qualifier
2007e0
Comparator
acetamiprid 20 SPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly highest seed cotton yield of 20.32q/ha (2006) and 29.22 q/ha (2007) was harvested with higher dosage of SYN 13623 @ 300ml/ha and BY1 08330 150 OD @500ml/ha respectively proving them to be on par with acetamiprid 20 SP, a standard check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–641 · show in text ↑

application · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · Cicadellidae · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.