Paper · 2018 · Agronomy

Effect of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flight Height on Droplet Distribution, Drift and Control of Cotton Aphids and Spider Mites

Zhaoxia Lou; Fang Xin; Xiaoqiang Han; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
129
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), as emerging plant protection machinery, have the advantages of high operational efficiency, high speed, and low drift. The current study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of droplet distribution and drift, control efficiency on cotton aphids and spider mites, and attachment and absorption of cotton leaves during UAV spraying. Kromekote card and filter paper are used as samplers to collect droplets, and the droplet density, coverage rate, deposition, and drift percentage are statistically analyzed. The pooled results showed that the droplet uniformity, the droplet coverage rate, the deposition, and the drifting ability are higher when the UAV flight height was 2 m. The control effects by UAV spraying on cotton aphids and spider mites were 63.7% and 61.3%, respectively. These values are slightly inferior to those obtained through boom spraying. Cotton leaf attachment and absorption of spirodiclofen after UAV spraying were slightly lower than those after boom spraying, therefore, the control efficiency of cotton pests is slightly different. According to the different flight height operations by the UAV sprayer, the drift capability of the droplets at 2 m flight height was large, and the droplet uniformity and deposition were satisfactory. The research results could provide the theoretical basis and technical support for UAV operation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2 m UAV flight height, droplet uniformity, coverage, deposition and drifting ability were higher.

Treatment
UAV flight height was 2 me0
Outcome
droplet uniformity, the droplet coverage rate, the deposition, and the drifting abilitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“droplet uniformity, the droplet coverage rate, the deposition, and the drifting ability are higher when the UAV flight height was 2 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Aphids and Spider Mites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAV spraying controlled cotton aphids by 63.7%.

Treatment
UAV sprayinge0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
control effectse0
Value
63.7%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control effects by UAV spraying on cotton aphids and spider mites were 63.7% and 61.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAV spraying controlled cotton spider mites by 61.3%.

Treatment
UAV sprayinge0
Interactor
spider mitesTetranychidaee0pest
Outcome
control effectse0
Value
61.3%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control effects by UAV spraying on cotton aphids and spider mites were 63.7% and 61.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAV pest control effects were slightly inferior to boom spraying.

Treatment
UAV sprayingt0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphat0pest
Outcome
These valuese0
Direction
slightly inferiore0
Comparator
boom sprayinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These values are slightly inferior to those obtained through boom spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“control effects by UAV spraying on cotton aphids and spider mites were 63.7% and 61.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton leaf attachment and absorption of spirodiclofen were slightly lower after UAV spraying than boom spraying.

Treatment
UAV sprayinge0
Outcome
leaf attachment and absorption of spirodiclofene0
Direction
slightly lowere0
Comparator
boom sprayinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton leaf attachment and absorption of spirodiclofen after UAV spraying were slightly lower than those after boom spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1017 · show in text ↑

application · Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.