Paper · 2016 · THE ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE

Assessment of sticky trap parametersviz., colour, height, direction and combination with azadirachtin against cotton leafhopper

S.D. BANTEWAD; A.Y. THAKARE; R.M. WADASKAR

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the present investigation relative trapping efficiency of various colour sticky traps at four heights; alone and in combination with azadirachtin 10000 ppm @ 2ml/lit. was assessed against cotton leafhopper. Data on trap height revealed superiority of sticky trap erected 15 cm below crop canopy in terms of significantly higher adult leafhopper trapping (716.67/trap) and was comparable with trap along the crop canopy (634.78/trap). These superior treatments were followed by trap installed at 30 cm and 60 cm above the crop canopy with 517.50 and 192.47 leafhoppers /trap, respectively. Use of yellow colour trap was most efficacious with respect to trapping of adult leafhoppers (736.56 leafhoppers/trap) and was followed by combination of yellow and blue colour (498.48 leafhoppers/ trap), whereas, least population was trapped on blue colour traps with 315.10 leafhoppers/trap. Significantly higher catches of leafhopper on trap were evident when used in combination with azadirachtin sprays on crop (353.14/trap) over traps without azadirachtin sprays (274.38/trap). Interaction effect of trap height, colour and azadirachtin on total catches of leafhoppers indicated superiority of yellow sticky trap erected at 15 cm height below crop canopy in combination with azadirachtin spray and was in turn statistically at par with the yellow sticky trap along crop canopy in combination with azadirachtin spray and yellow sticky trap at 15 cm height below crop canopy without azadirachtin spray. Higher efficacy of trap colour and height combination was evident in combination with azadirachtin 10000ppm @ 2ml/lit. spray on crop with yellow sticky trap at 15cm below crop canopy as the most effective in recording minimum population of leafhoppers (2.40 and 3.32 leafhoppers/leaf) over 5.42 and 6.45 leafhoppers/leaf in untreated control at 7 and 14 days after application of azadirachtin. Irrespective of trap colour, height and combination with azadirachtin significantly maximum catches of leafhopper population was recorded on trap in North East direction as compared to South West direction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

15 cm below crop canopy trapped 716.67/trap adult leafhoppers.

Treatment
15 cm below crop canopye0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
adult leafhopper trappinge0
Direction
highere0
Value
716.67/trape0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Data on trap height revealed superiority of sticky trap erected 15 cm below crop canopy in terms of significantly higher adult leafhopper trapping (716.67/trap) and was comparable with trap along the crop canopy (634.78/trap).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

along the crop canopy trapped 634.78/trap adult leafhoppers.

Treatment
along the crop canopye0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
adult leafhopper trappinge0
Value
634.78/trape0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Data on trap height revealed superiority of sticky trap erected 15 cm below crop canopy in terms of significantly higher adult leafhopper trapping (716.67/trap) and was comparable with trap along the crop canopy (634.78/trap).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Traps at 30 cm caught 517.50 leafhoppers per trap.

Treatment
30 cme0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
leafhoppers /trape0
Value
517.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“These superior treatments were followed by trap installed at 30 cm and 60 cm above the crop canopy with 517.50 and 192.47 leafhoppers /trap, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–591 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Traps at 60 cm caught 192.47 leafhoppers per trap.

Treatment
60 cme0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
leafhoppers /trape0
Value
192.47e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“These superior treatments were followed by trap installed at 30 cm and 60 cm above the crop canopy with 517.50 and 192.47 leafhoppers /trap, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

yellow colour trap caught 736.56 leafhoppers/trap.

Treatment
yellow colour trape0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
leafhoppers/trape0
Direction
most efficaciouse0
Value
736.56 leafhoppers/trape0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Use of yellow colour trap was most efficacious with respect to trapping of adult leafhoppers (736.56 leafhoppers/trap) and was followed by combination of yellow and blue colour (498.48 leafhoppers/ trap), whereas, least population was trapped on blue colour traps with 315.10 leafhoppers/trap.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

combination of yellow and blue colour caught 498.48 leafhoppers/ trap.

Treatment
combination of yellow and blue coloure0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
leafhoppers/ trape0
Value
498.48 leafhoppers/ trape0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Use of yellow colour trap was most efficacious with respect to trapping of adult leafhoppers (736.56 leafhoppers/trap) and was followed by combination of yellow and blue colour (498.48 leafhoppers/ trap), whereas, least population was trapped on blue colour traps with 315.10 leafhoppers/trap.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

blue colour traps caught 315.10 leafhoppers/trap.

Treatment
blue colour trapse0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
leafhoppers/ trape0
Direction
leaste0
Value
315.10 leafhoppers/trape0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Use of yellow colour trap was most efficacious with respect to trapping of adult leafhoppers (736.56 leafhoppers/trap) and was followed by combination of yellow and blue colour (498.48 leafhoppers/ trap), whereas, least population was trapped on blue colour traps with 315.10 leafhoppers/trap.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin sprays increased trap catches to 353.14/trap versus 274.38/trap.

Treatment
azadirachtin sprayse0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
catches of leafhopper on trape0
Direction
highere0
Value
353.14/trape0
Qualifier
274.38/trape0
Comparator
traps without azadirachtin sprayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly higher catches of leafhopper on trap were evident when used in combination with azadirachtin sprays on crop (353.14/trap) over traps without azadirachtin sprays (274.38/trap).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A yellow trap 15 cm below canopy with azadirachtin had the best total catches, statistically comparable to two other yellow trap combinations.

Treatment
yellow sticky trap erected at 15 cm height below crop canopy in combination with azadirachtin spraye0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
total catches of leafhopperse0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
yellow sticky trap along crop canopy in combination with azadirachtin spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Interaction effect of trap height, colour and azadirachtin on total catches of leafhoppers indicated superiority of yellow sticky trap erected at 15 cm height below crop canopy in combination with azadirachtin spray and was in turn statistically at par with the yellow sticky trap along crop canopy in combination with azadirachtin spray and yellow sticky trap at 15 cm height below crop canopy without azadirachtin spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined yellow trap and azadirachtin reduced leafhopper population to 2.40 at day 7, versus 5.42 in control.

Treatment
azadirachtin 10000ppm @ 2ml/lit. spray on crop with yellow sticky trap at 15cm below crop canopye0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
population of leafhopperse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
2.40e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher efficacy of trap colour and height combination was evident in combination with azadirachtin 10000ppm @ 2ml/lit. spray on crop with yellow sticky trap at 15cm below crop canopy as the most effective in recording minimum population of leafhoppers (2.40 and 3.32 leafhoppers/leaf) over 5.42 and 6.45 leafhoppers/leaf in untreated control at 7 and 14 days after application of azadirachtin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined yellow trap and azadirachtin reduced leafhopper population to 3.32 leafhoppers/leaf at day 14, versus 6.45 leafhoppers/leaf in control.

Treatment
azadirachtin 10000ppm @ 2ml/lit. spray on crop with yellow sticky trap at 15cm below crop canopye0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
population of leafhopperse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
3.32 leafhoppers/leafe0
Qualifier
14 dayse0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher efficacy of trap colour and height combination was evident in combination with azadirachtin 10000ppm @ 2ml/lit. spray on crop with yellow sticky trap at 15cm below crop canopy as the most effective in recording minimum population of leafhoppers (2.40 and 3.32 leafhoppers/leaf) over 5.42 and 6.45 leafhoppers/leaf in untreated control at 7 and 14 days after application of azadirachtin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Northeast facing traps caught significantly more leafhoppers than southwest facing traps.

Treatment
North East directione0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
catches of leafhopper populatione0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
South West directione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrespective of trap colour, height and combination with azadirachtin significantly maximum catches of leafhopper population was recorded on trap in North East direction as compared to South West direction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–2099 · show in text ↑

application · Cicadellidae · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.