Abstract
In order to limit the risks related to the use of chemical inputs in truck farming such as soil and truck contamination by ETM and residue of pesticide which remain a major danger for human health, agro-ecological production methods of KK Cross cabbage variety were developed. These methods consist in protecting truck with anti-insect net (PF), aqueous extracts from cow dung (PB), from neem seeds (PN), with mixtures of garlic and pepper extracts (PAP) of cow dung and pepper (PBP) and with mixtures of pepper, garlic and neem seeds (PPAN) against Plutella and xylostella larvae of cabbage plants which are cultivated on soil fertilized with mixtures of hen droppings converted into compost. These agro-ecological methods were compared to chemical methods of cabbage production. Findings have indicated that cabbage farming practiced on various soil types fertilized with elaborate compost and protected with PF, PPAN, PN, PBP and PB has reduced the attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by respectively 97%, 93.68%, 90.63%, 84.30% and 71.89 % compared to chemical methods except PAP method.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Protecting cabbage with anti-insect net (PF) reduced attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by 97% compared with chemical methods.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae0 - Treatment
- PFe0
- Interactor
- Plutella xylostella
Plutella xylostellae0pest - Outcome
- attacks of Plutella xylostella larvaee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 97%e0
- Comparator
- chemical methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Findings have indicated that cabbage farming practiced on various soil types fertilized with elaborate compost and protected with PF, PPAN, PN, PBP and PB has reduced the attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by respectively 97%, 93.68%, 90.63%, 84.30% and 71.89 % compared to chemical methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Protecting cabbage with pepper, garlic and neem seed mixture (PPAN) reduced attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by 93.68% compared with chemical methods.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- PPANe0
- Interactor
- Plutella xylostellaPlutella xylostellae0pest
- Outcome
- attacks of Plutella xylostella larvaee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 93.68%e0
- Comparator
- chemical methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Findings have indicated that cabbage farming practiced on various soil types fertilized with elaborate compost and protected with PF, PPAN, PN, PBP and PB has reduced the attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by respectively 97%, 93.68%, 90.63%, 84.30% and 71.89 % compared to chemical methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Protecting cabbage with neem seed extract (PN) reduced attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by 90.63% compared with chemical methods.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- PNe0
- Interactor
- Plutella xylostellaPlutella xylostellae0pest
- Outcome
- attacks of Plutella xylostella larvaee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 90.63%e0
- Comparator
- chemical methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Findings have indicated that cabbage farming practiced on various soil types fertilized with elaborate compost and protected with PF, PPAN, PN, PBP and PB has reduced the attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by respectively 97%, 93.68%, 90.63%, 84.30% and 71.89 % compared to chemical methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Protecting cabbage with cow dung and pepper extract mixture (PBP) reduced attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by 84.30% compared with chemical methods.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- PBPe0
- Interactor
- Plutella xylostellaPlutella xylostellae0pest
- Outcome
- attacks of Plutella xylostella larvaee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 84.30%e0
- Comparator
- chemical methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Findings have indicated that cabbage farming practiced on various soil types fertilized with elaborate compost and protected with PF, PPAN, PN, PBP and PB has reduced the attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by respectively 97%, 93.68%, 90.63%, 84.30% and 71.89 % compared to chemical methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Protecting cabbage with cow dung extract (PB) reduced attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by 71.89 % compared with chemical methods.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- PBe0
- Interactor
- Plutella xylostellaPlutella xylostellae0pest
- Outcome
- attacks of Plutella xylostella larvaee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 71.89 %e0
- Comparator
- chemical methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Findings have indicated that cabbage farming practiced on various soil types fertilized with elaborate compost and protected with PF, PPAN, PN, PBP and PB has reduced the attacks of Plutella xylostella larvae by respectively 97%, 93.68%, 90.63%, 84.30% and 71.89 % compared to chemical methods”
The same questions in other papers
Allium sativum · Plutella xylostella · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
botanical · Plutella xylostella · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.