Abstract
A field study was conducted during winter season of 2017–18 at Department of Agronomy, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar under irrigated conditions to evaluate the management of P. minor through sequential application of pre-emergence (PE) and post-emergence (PoE) herbicide in wheat crop and their phytotoxic effect on the succeeding crop. Total fifteen treatments consisting of pre-emergence (PE) use of pendimethalin 1500 g/ha, clodinafop 60 and 120 g/ha (35 DAS), sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha (35 DAS), sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 32 g/ha (35 DAS), pinoxaden 50 g/ha (35 DAS), mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron (RM) 14.4 g/ha (35 DAS), PE of pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) 2000 g/ha, PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) fb clodinafop 60 g/ha (35 DAS), PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) fb sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha (35 DAS), PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) fb sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 32 g/ha(35 DAS), PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) fb pinoxaden 50 g/ha (35 DAS), PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) fb mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron (RM) 14.4 g/ha (35 DAS), weedy check and weed free were take. The results of present study revealed that PE followed by PoE herbicides are effective for the control of resistant P. minor population. The sequential application of PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) 2000 g/ha fb mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron (RM) 14.4 g/ha followed by PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) 2000 g/ha fb sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (RM) 32 g/ha and pinoxaden 50 g/ha were the most effective for control of resistant P. minor compared to alone PE or PoE herbicide. Grain yield and economics were also higher with these treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential pre-emergence then post-emergence herbicides controlled resistant P. minor in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- PE followed by PoE herbicidese0
- Interactor
- P. minor
Phalaris minore0weed - Outcome
- control of resistant P. minor populatione0
- Direction
- effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Phalaris minor through sequential application of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in wheat”
e0“PE followed by PoE herbicides are effective for the control of resistant P. minor population”
Claim · model-written summary
Pendimethalin plus metribuzin followed by mesosulfuron plus iodosulfuron was most effective against resistant P. minor compared with a single timing.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) 2000 g/ha fb mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron (RM) 14.4 g/hae0
- Interactor
- P. minor
Phalaris minore0weed - Outcome
- control of resistant P. minore0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Comparator
- alone PE or PoE herbicidee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“in wheat”
e0“PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) 2000 g/ha fb mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron (RM) 14.4 g/ha followed by PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) 2000 g/ha fb sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (RM) 32 g/ha and pinoxaden 50 g/ha were the most effective for control of resistant P. minor compared to alone PE or PoE herbicide”
Claim · model-written summary
Pendimethalin plus metribuzin followed by sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron was among the most effective treatments for resistant P. minor.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) 2000 g/ha fb sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (RM) 32 g/hae0
- Interactor
- P. minor
Phalaris minore0weed - Outcome
- control of resistant P. minore0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Comparator
- alone PE or PoE herbicidee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“in wheat”
e0“PE pendimethalin + metribuzin (RM) 2000 g/ha fb sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron (RM) 32 g/ha and pinoxaden 50 g/ha were the most effective for control of resistant P. minor compared to alone PE or PoE herbicide”
Claim · model-written summary
Pinoxaden was among the most effective treatments for resistant P. minor.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- pinoxaden 50 g/hae0
- Interactor
- P. minor
Phalaris minore0weed - Outcome
- control of resistant P. minore0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Comparator
- alone PE or PoE herbicidee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“in wheat”
e0“pinoxaden 50 g/ha were the most effective for control of resistant P. minor compared to alone PE or PoE herbicide”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain yield was higher with the effective herbicide treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- these treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“in wheat”
e0“Grain yield and economics were also higher with these treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Economics were higher with the effective wheat herbicide treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- these treatmentse0
- Outcome
- economicse0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“in wheat”
e0“Grain yield and economics were also higher with these treatments”
The same questions in other papers
pinoxaden · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →pendimethalin · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →metsulfuron methyl · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →metribuzin · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →herbicide · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.