Abstract
The field experiment was conducted at Students’ Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during rabi 2013–14 to study the bio-efficacy of two new brand formulations-Penda 30 EC and Markpendi 30 EC for control of Phalaris minor in wheat. New brand formulations of pendimethalin (Penda 30 EC and Markpendi 30 EC) @ 2.5 l/ha were tested against recommended brand formulation (Stomp 30 EC) @ 2.5 l/ha and unsprayed check in randomized block design in three replications. The tested new brand formulations of pendimethalin (Markpendi 30 EC and Penda 30 EC) were at par to earlier recommended brand (Stomp 30 EC) with respect to weed population, dry matter accumulation and wheat grain yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 1
Claim · model-written summary
New pendimethalin brand formulations were at par with the recommended brand for weed population, dry matter accumulation and wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- new brand formulations of pendimethaline1
- Interactor
- Phalaris minor
.jpg?width=60)
Phalaris minore0weed - Outcome
- weed population, dry matter accumulation and wheat grain yielde1
- Direction
- at pare1
- Comparator
- earlier recommended brand (Stomp 30 EC)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“for control of Phalaris minor in wheat”
e1“The tested new brand formulations of pendimethalin (Markpendi 30 EC and Penda 30 EC) were at par to earlier recommended brand (Stomp 30 EC) with respect to weed population, dry matter accumulation and wheat grain yield”
The same questions in other papers
pendimethalin · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.