Paper · 2016 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Pollination and Thinning Methods on Yield and Fruit Quality of Saidy Date Palms

Mona Samouni; El-Salhy; Ibtesam; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of fruit thinning and pollen grains dusting as a pollination methods of Saidy date palm which combines of both mechanical pollination and fruit thinning were studied during 2013, 2014 and 2015 seasons. Pollen mixed with starch in ratio of 1:1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 as 50, 25, 17, 12.5 and 10% active ingredients. Fruit thinning was carried out by 15, 30 and 45% removal of setting fruits. The obtained results indicated that there were reduction in the percentage of fruit retention and fruit weight/bunch as the pollen grains concentration was lower or fruit thinning was done. There were no significant differences in fruit weight/bunch due to dusting pollen grains powder at 50 or 25% compared to control. On other hand, there was an improve in the fruit quality in terms of increasing the fruit weight, pulp %, total soluble solids and sugar contents and decreasing the fruit moisture content was observed with reduction of pollen grain concentrations and doing fruit thinning. Furthermore, there were no significant difference due to pollination by 17% pollen grains and removing 15% of fruit setting, as well as 12.5% pollen grains and 30% removal of setting fruit. It could be concluded that pollination by 12.5% pollen grains powder or removing 30% of fruit setting could be a considerable yield with good fruit quality. In addition, dusting pollen grains powder at 12.5% resulted in combined of mechanical pollination and fruit thinning effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower pollen concentration reduced fruit retention and bunch weight.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
pollen grains concentratione0
Outcome
percentage of fruit retention and fruit weight/bunche0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there were reduction in the percentage of fruit retention and fruit weight/bunch as the pollen grains concentration was lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–554 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit thinning reduced fruit retention and bunch weight.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
fruit thinninge0
Outcome
percentage of fruit retention and fruit weight/bunche0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there were reduction in the percentage of fruit retention and fruit weight/bunch as the pollen grains concentration was lower or fruit thinning was done.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–582 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunch weight did not differ significantly between 50% or 25% pollen dusting and control.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
dusting pollen grains powder at 50 or 25%e0
Outcome
fruit weight/bunche0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences in fruit weight/bunch due to dusting pollen grains powder at 50 or 25% compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower pollen concentration increased fruit weight, pulp percentage, soluble solids and sugar, while reducing moisture.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
reduction of pollen grain concentrationse0
Outcome
fruit weight, pulp %, total soluble solids and sugar contentse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was an improve in the fruit quality in terms of increasing the fruit weight, pulp %, total soluble solids and sugar contents and decreasing the fruit moisture content was observed with reduction of pollen grain concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–959 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower pollen concentration decreased fruit moisture content.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
reduction of pollen grain concentrationse0
Outcome
fruit moisture contente0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing the fruit moisture content was observed with reduction of pollen grain concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–959 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit thinning increased fruit weight, pulp percentage, soluble solids and sugar contents.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
doing fruit thinninge0
Outcome
fruit weight, pulp %, total soluble solids and sugar contentse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the fruit weight, pulp %, total soluble solids and sugar contents and decreasing the fruit moisture content was observed with reduction of pollen grain concentrations and doing fruit thinning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit thinning decreased fruit moisture content.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
doing fruit thinninge0
Outcome
fruit moisture contente0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing the fruit moisture content was observed with reduction of pollen grain concentrations and doing fruit thinning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 17% pollen and 15% thinning treatments showed no significant difference.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
pollination by 17% pollen grainse0
Outcome
no significant differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
removing 15% of fruit settinge0

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant difference due to pollination by 17% pollen grains and removing 15% of fruit setting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1109 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 12.5% pollen and 30% thinning treatments showed no significant difference.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
12.5% pollen grainse0
Outcome
no significant differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
30% removal of setting fruite0

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant difference due to pollination by 17% pollen grains and removing 15% of fruit setting, as well as 12.5% pollen grains and 30% removal of setting fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend 12.5% pollen powder or 30% thinning for yield and quality.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
pollination by 12.5% pollen grains powder or removing 30% of fruit settinge0
Outcome
considerable yield with good fruit qualitye0

Verbatim

e0

“pollination by 12.5% pollen grains powder or removing 30% of fruit setting could be a considerable yield with good fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1332 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dusting 12.5% pollen combined mechanical pollination and thinning effects.

Taxon
Saidy date palme1
Treatment
dusting pollen grains powder at 12.5%e0
Outcome
combined of mechanical pollination and fruit thinning effectse0

Verbatim

e0

“dusting pollen grains powder at 12.5% resulted in combined of mechanical pollination and fruit thinning effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1458 · show in text ↑
e1

“Saidy date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · yield · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

pruning · quality: grain · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.