Paper · 1969 · Japanese Journal of Phytopathology

Studies on the Fusarium Disease of Crops

Chun-Yiang HONG

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present paper deals with the result of experiments on the effect of rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetes on the damping-off of cucumber seedlings inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f. cucumerinum.Fusarium oxysporum f. cucumerinum, (F 22), showed a strong pathogenicity to cucumber seedlings and caused typical damping-off, when inoculated in sterilized soil. Occurrence of post-emergence damping-off of the seedlings, however, was extensively delayed by concomitant inoculation of F 22 with rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetes. The extent of delay was remarkable when Gram-negative bacteria were inoculated concomitantly with F 22. Occurrence of pre-emergence damping-off of seedlings was also delayed by the concomitant inoculation of F 22 with rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetes, isolate A-C.These results suggested that occurrence pattern of pre-emergence damping-off and post-emergence damping-off in the field might be extensively influenced by the rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium F22 caused typical damping-off in cucumber seedlings in sterilized soil.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. cucumerinumFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinume0pathogen
Outcome
typical damping-offe0
Setting
sterilized soile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium oxysporum f. cucumerinum, (F 22), showed a strong pathogenicity to cucumber seedlings and caused typical damping-off, when inoculated in sterilized soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concomitant rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetes delayed post-emergence damping-off.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativust0
Treatment
concomitant inoculation of F 22 with rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetese0
Interactor
F 22e0pathogen
Second interactor
rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
post-emergence damping-offe0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Occurrence of post-emergence damping-off of the seedlings, however, was extensively delayed by concomitant inoculation of F 22 with rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“damping-off of cucumber seedlings inoculated with Fusarium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gram-negative bacteria particularly delayed post-emergence damping-off with F22.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Gram-negative bacteria were inoculated concomitantly with F 22e0
Interactor
F 22e0pathogen
Second interactor
Gram-negative bacteriae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
extent of delaye0
Direction
remarkablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extent of delay was remarkable when Gram-negative bacteria were inoculated concomitantly with F 22.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“damping-off of cucumber seedlings inoculated with Fusarium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycete isolate A-C delayed pre-emergence damping-off.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativust0
Treatment
concomitant inoculation of F 22 with rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetes, isolate A-Ce0
Interactor
F 22e0pathogen
Second interactor
rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetes, isolate A-Ce0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pre-emergence damping-offe0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Occurrence of pre-emergence damping-off of seedlings was also delayed by the concomitant inoculation of F 22 with rhizosphere bacteria and actinomycetes, isolate A-C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“damping-off of cucumber seedlings inoculated with Fusarium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–176 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 50 positive, 33 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.