Paper · 2016 · Agrica

Impact of intercropping on incidence of Scirpophaga excerptalis walk. and Ustilago scitaminea Syn. in sugarcane under Bihar condition.

Anil Kumar; Minnatullah Minnatullah; Hari Chand

14
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

All the intercrops showed significantly lower incidence of top borer, (Scirpophaga excerptalis) and smut (Ustilago scitaminea) than sole crop of sugarcane. Among intercrops, sugarcane intercropped with coriander registered lower (10.56%) incidence of top borer and Smut (4.69%) followed by sugarcane with garlic 10.76% and 5.33% respectively. In case of per cent reduction in incidence of top borer and smut being 34.22% and 44.24% respectively. Whereas, in sole crop showed highest incidence being 16.36% and 9.56% of top borer and smut, respectively. Similarly, sugarcane intercropped with coriander was recorded highest (83.03 t/ha) yield followed by Sugarcane + Garlic (81.29 t/ha), when it was compared to sole crop the per cent increased yield (10.22%) with Sugarcane + Coriander followed by Sugarcane + Garlic (8.30%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrops significantly reduced top borer incidence relative to sole sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropse0
Interactor
Scirpophaga excerptalisScirpophaga excerptalise0pest
Outcome
incidence of top borere0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
sole crop of sugarcanee0

Verbatim

e0

“All the intercrops showed significantly lower incidence of top borer, (Scirpophaga excerptalis) and smut (Ustilago scitaminea) than sole crop of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrops significantly reduced smut incidence relative to sole sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropse0
Interactor
Ustilago scitamineaSporisorium scitamineume0pathogen
Outcome
smute0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
sole crop of sugarcanee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporisorium scitamineum
Sporisorium scitamineum · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the intercrops showed significantly lower incidence of top borer, (Scirpophaga excerptalis) and smut (Ustilago scitaminea) than sole crop of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with coriander had 10.56% top borer incidence.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropped with coriandere0
Interactor
Scirpophaga excerptalisScirpophaga excerptalist0pest
Outcome
incidence of top borere0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10.56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane intercropped with coriander registered lower (10.56%) incidence of top borer and Smut (4.69%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scirpophaga excerptalis walk. and Ustilago scitaminea Syn. in sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with coriander had 4.69% smut incidence.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropped with coriandere0
Interactor
Ustilago scitamineaSporisorium scitamineumt0pathogen
Outcome
Smute0
Direction
lowere0
Value
4.69%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporisorium scitamineum
Sporisorium scitamineum · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane intercropped with coriander registered lower (10.56%) incidence of top borer and Smut (4.69%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scirpophaga excerptalis walk. and Ustilago scitaminea Syn. in sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with garlic had 10.76% top borer incidence.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
with garlice0
Interactor
Scirpophaga excerptalisScirpophaga excerptalist0pest
Outcome
incidence of top borere0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Among intercrops, sugarcane intercropped with coriander registered lower (10.56%) incidence of top borer and Smut (4.69%) followed by sugarcane with garlic 10.76% and 5.33% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“incidence of Scirpophaga excerptalis walk. and Ustilago scitaminea Syn. in sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with garlic had 5.33% smut incidence.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
with garlice0
Interactor
Ustilago scitamineaSporisorium scitamineumt0pathogen
Outcome
Smute0
Direction
lowere0
Value
5.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporisorium scitamineum
Sporisorium scitamineum · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among intercrops, sugarcane intercropped with coriander registered lower (10.56%) incidence of top borer and Smut (4.69%) followed by sugarcane with garlic 10.76% and 5.33% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“incidence of Scirpophaga excerptalis walk. and Ustilago scitaminea Syn. in sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top borer incidence fell by 34.22%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
Scirpophaga excerptalisScirpophaga excerptalist0pest
Outcome
incidence of top borere0
Direction
reductione0
Value
34.22%e0

Verbatim

e0

“per cent reduction in incidence of top borer and smut being 34.22% and 44.24% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scirpophaga excerptalis walk. and Ustilago scitaminea Syn. in sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smut incidence fell by 44.24%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
Ustilago scitamineaSporisorium scitamineumt0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of top borer and smute0
Direction
reductione0
Value
44.24%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporisorium scitamineum
Sporisorium scitamineum · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“per cent reduction in incidence of top borer and smut being 34.22% and 44.24% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scirpophaga excerptalis walk. and Ustilago scitaminea Syn. in sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole sugarcane had the highest top borer incidence, 16.36%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
Scirpophaga excerptalisScirpophaga excerptalist0pest
Outcome
top borere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.36%e0

Verbatim

e0

“sole crop showed highest incidence being 16.36% and 9.56% of top borer and smut, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scirpophaga excerptalis walk. and Ustilago scitaminea Syn. in sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole sugarcane had the highest smut incidence, 9.56%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
Ustilago scitamineaSporisorium scitamineumt0pathogen
Outcome
smute0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.56%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporisorium scitamineum
Sporisorium scitamineum · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sole crop showed highest incidence being 16.36% and 9.56% of top borer and smut, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scirpophaga excerptalis walk. and Ustilago scitaminea Syn. in sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with coriander yielded 83.03 t/ha, the highest yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropped with coriandere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
83.03 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane intercropped with coriander was recorded highest (83.03 t/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with garlic yielded 81.29 t/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Garlice0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
81.29 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, sugarcane intercropped with coriander was recorded highest (83.03 t/ha) yield followed by Sugarcane + Garlic (81.29 t/ha), when it was compared to sole crop the per cent increased yield (10.22%) with Sugarcane + Coriander followed by Sugarcane + Garlic (8.30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane under Bihar condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coriander intercropping increased yield by 10.22% relative to sole sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Coriandere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.22%e0
Comparator
sole crope0

Verbatim

e0

“when it was compared to sole crop the per cent increased yield (10.22%) with Sugarcane + Coriander”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic intercropping increased yield by 8.30% relative to sole sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
Garlice0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, sugarcane intercropped with coriander was recorded highest (83.03 t/ha) yield followed by Sugarcane + Garlic (81.29 t/ha), when it was compared to sole crop the per cent increased yield (10.22%) with Sugarcane + Coriander followed by Sugarcane + Garlic (8.30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane under Bihar condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–133 · show in text ↑

Coriandrum sativum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Allium sativum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

intercropping · Scirpophaga excerptalis · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · Sporisorium scitamineum · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.