Abstract
Investigations were carried out to know the post release movement of Trichogramma chilonis in sugarcane ecosystem. impact of intercrops and T chilonis on the incidence of early shoot borer of sugarcane, Chilo infuscatellus and to assess efficacy of different IPM modules against early shoot borer in sugarcane. Studies on the movement of T chilonis based on recovery of T chilonis keeping Corcyra eggs at varied distances revealed that up to 1–5 m distance, the % parasitization did not differ significantly. Beyond 5 m, the % recovery decreased at increasing rate. 40–50% more recovery was found at down wind sectors than at upwind at 45, 60 and 75 days after planting (DAP), however, at 90 DAP, it did not differ. Results on the impact of various intercrops (coriander, soybean, french bean and okra) and T chilonis on C. injilscatellus indicated that marked control of C. injilscatellus and highest activity of T chilonis was found in the combination of sugarcane + coriander. On the contrary, sugarcane intercropped with okra recorded higher % infestation of C. infuscatellus and lower activity of T chilonis. The highest number millable canes (l,l3,130/ha), cane yield (92.2 t/ha), cane equivalent yield (100.5 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs.63,498) was obtained when sugarcane was grown along with coriander. C. infuscatellus incidence was significantly less (2.6 to 7.2%) in module I (sevidol, endosulfan and T chilonis) followed by module II (granular virus and T chilonis) however, highest % incidence was observed in module III (cndosulfan sprays). Module I recorded the highest cost benefit ratio of 1:2.8 followed by module II.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
T. chilonis parasitization did not differ significantly across 1–5 m.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Interactor
- T chilonis
Trichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- % parasitizatione0
- Direction
- did not differ significantlye0
- Value
- 1–5 me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_2b.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“up to 1–5 m distance, the % parasitization did not differ significantly.”
t0“Sugarcane”
e1“movement of T chilonis”
Claim · model-written summary
Beyond 5 m, T. chilonis recovery decreased with distance.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Interactor
- T chilonis
Trichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- % recoverye0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Setting
- Beyond 5 me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_2b.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Beyond 5 m, the % recovery decreased at increasing rate.”
t0“Sugarcane”
e1“movement of T chilonis”
Claim · model-written summary
Downwind T. chilonis recovery exceeded upwind recovery by 40–50% at 45, 60 and 75 DAP.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Interactor
- T chilonis
Trichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- recoverye0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 40–50%e0
- Comparator
- upwinde0
- Setting
- down wind sectorse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_2b.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“40–50% more recovery was found at down wind sectors than at upwind at 45, 60 and 75 days after planting (DAP)”
t0“Sugarcane”
e1“movement of T chilonis”
Claim · model-written summary
At 90 DAP, downwind and upwind T. chilonis recovery did not differ.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Interactor
- T chilonis
Trichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- it did not differe0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Qualifier
- 90 DAPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_2b.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“at 90 DAP, it did not differ.”
t0“Sugarcane”
e1“movement of T chilonis”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with coriander gave marked C. injilscatellus control.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- sugarcane + coriandere0
- Interactor
- C. injilscatelluse0pest
- Outcome
- control of C. injilscatelluse0
- Direction
- markede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“marked control of C. injilscatellus and highest activity of T chilonis was found in the combination of sugarcane + coriander.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with coriander had the highest T chilonis activity.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- sugarcane + coriandere0
- Interactor
- T chilonis
Trichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- activity of T chilonise0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_2b.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“marked control of C. injilscatellus and highest activity of T chilonis was found in the combination of sugarcane + coriander.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with okra had higher C. infuscatellus infestation.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- intercropped with okrae0
- Interactor
- C. infuscatellusChilo infuscatelluse0pest
- Outcome
- % infestation of C. infuscatelluse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane intercropped with okra recorded higher % infestation of C. infuscatellus and lower activity of T chilonis.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with okra had lower T chilonis activity.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- intercropped with okrae0
- Interactor
- T chilonis
Trichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- activity of T chilonise0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_2b.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“sugarcane intercropped with okra recorded higher % infestation of C. infuscatellus and lower activity of T chilonis.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with coriander had the most millable canes, l,l3,130/ha.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- grown along with coriandere0
- Outcome
- number millable canese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- l,l3,130/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest number millable canes (l,l3,130/ha), cane yield (92.2 t/ha), cane equivalent yield (100.5 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs.63,498) was obtained when sugarcane was grown along with coriander.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with coriander yielded 92.2 t/ha, the highest.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- grown along with coriandere0
- Outcome
- cane yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 92.2 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest number millable canes (l,l3,130/ha), cane yield (92.2 t/ha), cane equivalent yield (100.5 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs.63,498) was obtained when sugarcane was grown along with coriander.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with coriander had the highest cane equivalent yield, 100.5 t/ha.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- grown along with coriandere0
- Outcome
- cane equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 100.5 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest number millable canes (l,l3,130/ha), cane yield (92.2 t/ha), cane equivalent yield (100.5 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs.63,498) was obtained when sugarcane was grown along with coriander.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with coriander had maximum net return, Rs.63,498.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Treatment
- grown along with coriandere0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- Rs.63,498e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest number millable canes (l,l3,130/ha), cane yield (92.2 t/ha), cane equivalent yield (100.5 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs.63,498) was obtained when sugarcane was grown along with coriander.”
Claim · model-written summary
Module I had significantly less C. infuscatellus incidence, 2.6 to 7.2%, than the modules that followed.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- module I (sevidol, endosulfan and T chilonis)e0
- Interactor
- C. infuscatellusChilo infuscatelluse0pest
- Second interactor
- T chilonis
Trichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- C. infuscatellus incidencee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 2.6 to 7.2%e0
- Comparator
- module II (granular virus and T chilonis)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_2b.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“C. infuscatellus incidence was significantly less (2.6 to 7.2%) in module I (sevidol, endosulfan and T chilonis) followed by module II (granular virus and T chilonis)”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Module III had the highest C. infuscatellus incidence.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- module III (cndosulfan sprays)e0
- Interactor
- C. infuscatellusChilo infuscatelluse1pestt0
- Outcome
- % incidencee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“highest % incidence was observed in module III (cndosulfan sprays).”
t0“Integrated Management of Early Shoot Borer, Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) in Sugarcane”
e1“sugarcane intercropped with okra recorded higher % infestation of C. infuscatellus and lower activity of T chilonis.”
Claim · model-written summary
Module I had the highest cost benefit ratio, 1:2.8.
Verbatim
e0“Module I recorded the highest cost benefit ratio of 1:2.8 followed by module II.”
t0“Sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
Coriandrum sativum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · Chilo infuscatellus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
intercropping · Chilo infuscatellus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.