Paper · 2004 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Integrated Management of Early Shoot Borer, Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) in Sugarcane

V. Rachappa; L. Krishna Naik

15
claims
27
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Investigations were carried out to know the post release movement of Trichogramma chilonis in sugarcane ecosystem. impact of intercrops and T chilonis on the incidence of early shoot borer of sugarcane, Chilo infuscatellus and to assess efficacy of different IPM modules against early shoot borer in sugarcane. Studies on the movement of T chilonis based on recovery of T chilonis keeping Corcyra eggs at varied distances revealed that up to 1–5 m distance, the % parasitization did not differ significantly. Beyond 5 m, the % recovery decreased at increasing rate. 40–50% more recovery was found at down wind sectors than at upwind at 45, 60 and 75 days after planting (DAP), however, at 90 DAP, it did not differ. Results on the impact of various intercrops (coriander, soybean, french bean and okra) and T chilonis on C. injilscatellus indicated that marked control of C. injilscatellus and highest activity of T chilonis was found in the combination of sugarcane + coriander. On the contrary, sugarcane intercropped with okra recorded higher % infestation of C. infuscatellus and lower activity of T chilonis. The highest number millable canes (l,l3,130/ha), cane yield (92.2 t/ha), cane equivalent yield (100.5 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs.63,498) was obtained when sugarcane was grown along with coriander. C. infuscatellus incidence was significantly less (2.6 to 7.2%) in module I (sevidol, endosulfan and T chilonis) followed by module II (granular virus and T chilonis) however, highest % incidence was observed in module III (cndosulfan sprays). Module I recorded the highest cost benefit ratio of 1:2.8 followed by module II.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. chilonis parasitization did not differ significantly across 1–5 m.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
T chilonisTrichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
% parasitizatione0
Direction
did not differ significantlye0
Value
1–5 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“up to 1–5 m distance, the % parasitization did not differ significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“movement of T chilonis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–348 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beyond 5 m, T. chilonis recovery decreased with distance.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
T chilonisTrichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
% recoverye0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
Beyond 5 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beyond 5 m, the % recovery decreased at increasing rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“movement of T chilonis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Downwind T. chilonis recovery exceeded upwind recovery by 40–50% at 45, 60 and 75 DAP.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
T chilonisTrichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
recoverye0
Direction
moree0
Value
40–50%e0
Comparator
upwinde0
Setting
down wind sectorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“40–50% more recovery was found at down wind sectors than at upwind at 45, 60 and 75 days after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“movement of T chilonis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 DAP, downwind and upwind T. chilonis recovery did not differ.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Interactor
T chilonisTrichogramma chilonise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
it did not differe0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
90 DAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 90 DAP, it did not differ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“movement of T chilonis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with coriander gave marked C. injilscatellus control.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
sugarcane + coriandere0
Interactor
C. injilscatelluse0pest
Outcome
control of C. injilscatelluse0
Direction
markede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“marked control of C. injilscatellus and highest activity of T chilonis was found in the combination of sugarcane + coriander.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with coriander had the highest T chilonis activity.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
sugarcane + coriandere0
Interactor
T chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activity of T chilonise0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marked control of C. injilscatellus and highest activity of T chilonis was found in the combination of sugarcane + coriander.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with okra had higher C. infuscatellus infestation.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropped with okrae0
Interactor
C. infuscatellusChilo infuscatelluse0pest
Outcome
% infestation of C. infuscatelluse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane intercropped with okra recorded higher % infestation of C. infuscatellus and lower activity of T chilonis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with okra had lower T chilonis activity.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropped with okrae0
Interactor
T chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activity of T chilonise0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · InteractorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugarcane intercropped with okra recorded higher % infestation of C. infuscatellus and lower activity of T chilonis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with coriander had the most millable canes, l,l3,130/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
grown along with coriandere0
Outcome
number millable canese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
l,l3,130/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number millable canes (l,l3,130/ha), cane yield (92.2 t/ha), cane equivalent yield (100.5 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs.63,498) was obtained when sugarcane was grown along with coriander.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with coriander yielded 92.2 t/ha, the highest.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
grown along with coriandere0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
92.2 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number millable canes (l,l3,130/ha), cane yield (92.2 t/ha), cane equivalent yield (100.5 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs.63,498) was obtained when sugarcane was grown along with coriander.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with coriander had the highest cane equivalent yield, 100.5 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
grown along with coriandere0
Outcome
cane equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
100.5 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number millable canes (l,l3,130/ha), cane yield (92.2 t/ha), cane equivalent yield (100.5 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs.63,498) was obtained when sugarcane was grown along with coriander.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with coriander had maximum net return, Rs.63,498.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
grown along with coriandere0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs.63,498e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number millable canes (l,l3,130/ha), cane yield (92.2 t/ha), cane equivalent yield (100.5 t/ha) and maximum net return (Rs.63,498) was obtained when sugarcane was grown along with coriander.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Module I had significantly less C. infuscatellus incidence, 2.6 to 7.2%, than the modules that followed.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
module I (sevidol, endosulfan and T chilonis)e0
Interactor
C. infuscatellusChilo infuscatelluse0pest
Second interactor
T chilonisTrichogramma chilonise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
C. infuscatellus incidencee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
2.6 to 7.2%e0
Comparator
module II (granular virus and T chilonis)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. infuscatellus incidence was significantly less (2.6 to 7.2%) in module I (sevidol, endosulfan and T chilonis) followed by module II (granular virus and T chilonis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Module III had the highest C. infuscatellus incidence.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
module III (cndosulfan sprays)e0
Interactor
C. infuscatellusChilo infuscatelluse1pestt0
Outcome
% incidencee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“highest % incidence was observed in module III (cndosulfan sprays).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated Management of Early Shoot Borer, Chilo infuscatellus (Snellen) in Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane intercropped with okra recorded higher % infestation of C. infuscatellus and lower activity of T chilonis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Module I had the highest cost benefit ratio, 1:2.8.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Module Ie0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1:2.8e0
Comparator
module IIe0

Verbatim

e0

“Module I recorded the highest cost benefit ratio of 1:2.8 followed by module II.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–86 · show in text ↑

Coriandrum sativum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · Chilo infuscatellus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · Chilo infuscatellus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.