Paper · 2009 · HortScience

Apple Root Growth, Turnover, and Distribution Under Different Orchard Groundcover Management Systems

Shengrui Yao; Ian A. Merwin; Michael G. Brown

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
37
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Minirhizotrons were used to study root emergence, turnover, and depth distribution of apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.) rootstocks (M.9/MM.111) under four groundcover management systems (GMSs)—pre-emergence herbicide (Pre-H), postemergence herbicide (Post-H), mowed sod grass (Grass), and hardwood bark mulch (Mulch)—that had been maintained since 1992 in an orchard near Ithaca, NY. Two root observation tubes were installed on both sides of one tree in three replicates for each GMS treatment. Roots were observed by camera at 2- to 3-weekly intervals during the growing seasons of 2002 and 2003 and from whole tree excavations in Apr. 2000. Tree growth and yield observations from 1992 to 2003 showed that Mulch and Post-H treatments produced more tree growth and higher yields than other treatments during most years; the Grass treatment usually had the smallest trees and lowest yields. More root emergence was observed in a light crop year (2002) than in a heavy crop year (2003). Pre-H treatment trees had more total roots and new roots than all other treatments, and trees in Grass plots had fewer total roots than others. Trees in Mulch plots had more shallow roots, and trees in Grass plots had more deep roots than others. Root diameter was positively correlated with overwintering root survival. The Pre-H treatment trees had greater root mortality than other trees during an unusually hot and dry growing season (2002) and this was attributed to higher shallow soil temperatures in this treatment. The GMS treatments affected root number and root depth distribution patterns. Despite microsprinkler irrigation, hot, dry weather conditions coincided with decreased root growth, increased root mortality, and reduced root median lifespan. GMS treatments affected root growth, turnover, and distribution at this orchard, and these differences were linked with long-term trends in tree growth and fruit production in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and postemergence herbicide gave greater tree growth and yield than other groundcovers in most years.

Treatment
Mulch and Post-H treatmentse1
Outcome
tree growth and higher yieldse1
Direction
moree1
Qualifier
during most yearse1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulch and Post-H treatments produced more tree growth and higher yields than other treatments during most years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass groundcover usually had the smallest trees and lowest yields.

Treatment
Grass treatmente1
Outcome
trees and lowest yieldse1
Direction
smalleste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Grass treatment usually had the smallest trees and lowest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–889 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More roots emerged in the light crop year 2002 than the heavy crop year 2003.

Outcome
root emergencee1
Direction
Moree1
Qualifier
light crop year (2002)e1
Comparator
heavy crop year (2003)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“More root emergence was observed in a light crop year (2002) than in a heavy crop year (2003)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-H trees had more total and new roots than other treatments.

Treatment
Pre-H treatmente1
Outcome
total roots and new rootse1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
all other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pre-H treatment trees had more total roots and new roots than all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass plots had fewer total roots than other treatments.

Treatment
Grass plotse1
Outcome
total rootse1
Direction
fewere1
Comparator
otherse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“trees in Grass plots had fewer total roots than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch plots had more shallow roots.

Treatment
Mulch plotse1
Outcome
shallow rootse1
Direction
moree1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trees in Mulch plots had more shallow roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass plots had more deep roots than others.

Treatment
Grass plotse1
Outcome
deep rootse1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
otherse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“trees in Grass plots had more deep roots than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1231 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger root diameter was associated with greater overwintering root survival.

Organ / stage
Roote1
Outcome
overwintering root survivale1
Direction
positively correlatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root diameter was positively correlated with overwintering root survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-H trees had greater root mortality than other trees during the hot, dry 2002 season.

Treatment
Pre-H treatmente1
Outcome
root mortalitye1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
unusually hot and dry growing season (2002)e1
Comparator
other treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Pre-H treatment trees had greater root mortality than other trees during an unusually hot and dry growing season (2002)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1430 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed higher Pre-H root mortality to higher shallow soil temperatures.

Treatment
Pre-H treatmente2
Outcome
root mortalitye2
Qualifier
higher shallow soil temperaturese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“this was attributed to higher shallow soil temperatures in this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1508 · show in text ↑
e2

“The Pre-H treatment trees had greater root mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1359 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot, dry weather coincided with decreased root growth.

Outcome
root growthe1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
hot, dry weather conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“hot, dry weather conditions coincided with decreased root growth, increased root mortality, and reduced root median lifespan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1747 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot, dry weather coincided with increased root mortality.

Outcome
root mortalitye1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
hot, dry weather conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“hot, dry weather conditions coincided with decreased root growth, increased root mortality, and reduced root median lifespan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1747 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot, dry weather coincided with reduced root median lifespan.

Outcome
root median lifespane1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
hot, dry weather conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“hot, dry weather conditions coincided with decreased root growth, increased root mortality, and reduced root median lifespan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1747 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundcover-related root differences were linked with long-term tree growth and fruit production trends.

Treatment
GMS treatmentse2
Outcome
tree growth and fruit productione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple ( Malus ×domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“these differences were linked with long-term trends in tree growth and fruit production in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1935 · show in text ↑
e2

“GMS treatments affected root growth, turnover, and distribution at this orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1828 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

51 papers: 41 positive, 10 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

herbicide · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.