Paper · 2016 · Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research

HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STUDIES ON GRAIN SORGHUM PLANTS INOCULATED BY ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI (AMF) TO CONTROL ACREMONIUM WILT DISEASE

Abd El-Rahman; E Mohamedp; G Eisap; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Anatomical structure variation in roots and stems of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plants, cultivated in pot experiment during the two successive growing summer seasons of 2014 and 2015 as affected by cultivar susceptibility to acremonium wilt disease, Acremonium strictum infection and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) root colonization as biocontrol agent were investigated. Root of resistant cultivar (Dorado) has more epidermis and exodermis thickness, diameter of root and pith as well as average number of xylem arms/ vascular cylinder but less cortex thickness and metaxylem vessel diameter in comparison with those of the susceptible one (Giza 54). Infection of susceptible cultivar plants by A. strictum markedly reduced all tested anatomical measurements of roots and stems compared to uninfected one. Hyphae and spores of A. strictum were observed into metaxylem vessels. Marked disintegration and loosening of some cortex cells, pith and metaxylem vessels. The same trend was observed in ground tissue and vascular bundles of stem. Colonization of roots by AMF considerably increased all tested roots and stems anatomical measurements, except metaxylem vessel diameter compared to untreated control. These results may explain the role of AMF root colonization in inducing defense responses grain sorghum as mycorrhizal fungi plant. Inoculation of grain sorghum cv. (Giza 54) by AMF markedly enhanced plant growth expressed as dry weight of roots and shoot as well as soil rhizosphere dehydrogenase activity whereas, disease incidence was reduced by 65% compared to uninoculated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant Dorado roots had thicker epidermis and exodermis, larger root and pith diameter, and more xylem arms than Giza 54.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Material
Doradoe0
Organ / stage
Roote0
Outcome
epidermis and exodermis thickness, diameter of root and pith as well as average number of xylem arms/ vascular cylindere0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Giza 54e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root of resistant cultivar (Dorado) has more epidermis and exodermis thickness, diameter of root and pith as well as average number of xylem arms/ vascular cylinder but less cortex thickness and metaxylem vessel diameter in comparison with those of the susceptible one (Giza 54).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dorado roots had less cortex thickness and metaxylem vessel diameter than Giza 54.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Material
Doradoe0
Organ / stage
Roote0
Outcome
cortex thickness and metaxylem vessel diametere0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
Giza 54e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root of resistant cultivar (Dorado) has more epidermis and exodermis thickness, diameter of root and pith as well as average number of xylem arms/ vascular cylinder but less cortex thickness and metaxylem vessel diameter in comparison with those of the susceptible one (Giza 54).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. strictum infection reduced measured root and stem anatomy in susceptible plants.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Infection of susceptible cultivar plants by A. strictume0
Interactor
A. strictumSarocladium strictume0pathogen
Outcome
all tested anatomical measurements of roots and stemse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
uninfected onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sarocladium strictum
Sarocladium strictum · InteractorCui Y, Meng J, Zhang J, Wang L, Yan H, Xia H, Cao J and Wu L · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infection of susceptible cultivar plants by A. strictum markedly reduced all tested anatomical measurements of roots and stems compared to uninfected one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. strictum hyphae and spores were observed in metaxylem vessels.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Interactor
A. strictumSarocladium strictume0pathogen
Outcome
Hyphae and spores of A. strictum were observed into metaxylem vesselse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sarocladium strictum
Sarocladium strictum · InteractorCui Y, Meng J, Zhang J, Wang L, Yan H, Xia H, Cao J and Wu L · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hyphae and spores of A. strictum were observed into metaxylem vessels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected roots showed cortex, pith and metaxylem disintegration and loosening.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
disintegration and loosening of some cortex cells, pith and metaxylem vesselse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marked disintegration and loosening of some cortex cells, pith and metaxylem vessels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A similar pattern was observed in stem ground tissue and vascular bundles.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
same trend was observed in ground tissue and vascular bundles of steme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same trend was observed in ground tissue and vascular bundles of stem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonization increased most measured root and stem anatomy relative to untreated controls.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Colonization of roots by AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
all tested roots and stems anatomical measurementse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colonization of roots by AMF considerably increased all tested roots and stems anatomical measurements, except metaxylem vessel diameter compared to untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF colonization did not increase metaxylem vessel diameter with the other anatomical measurements.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Colonization of roots by AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
metaxylem vessel diametere0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colonization of roots by AMF considerably increased all tested roots and stems anatomical measurements, except metaxylem vessel diameter compared to untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased root and shoot dry weight in Giza 54.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Material
Giza 54e0
Treatment
Inoculation of grain sorghum cv. (Giza 54) by AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
dry weight of roots and shoote0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of grain sorghum cv. (Giza 54) by AMF markedly enhanced plant growth expressed as dry weight of roots and shoot as well as soil rhizosphere dehydrogenase activity whereas, disease incidence was reduced by 65% compared to uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased soil rhizosphere dehydrogenase activity.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Material
Giza 54e0
Treatment
Inoculation of grain sorghum cv. (Giza 54) by AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
soil rhizosphere dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of grain sorghum cv. (Giza 54) by AMF markedly enhanced plant growth expressed as dry weight of roots and shoot as well as soil rhizosphere dehydrogenase activity whereas, disease incidence was reduced by 65% compared to uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation reduced disease incidence by 65% compared with uninoculated plants.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Material
Giza 54e0
Treatment
Inoculation of grain sorghum cv. (Giza 54) by AMFe0
Interactor
ACREMONIUMAcremoniumt0pathogen
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
65%e0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of grain sorghum cv. (Giza 54) by AMF markedly enhanced plant growth expressed as dry weight of roots and shoot as well as soil rhizosphere dehydrogenase activity whereas, disease incidence was reduced by 65% compared to uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“ACREMONIUM WILT DISEASE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–133 · show in text ↑

Sorghum · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Sorghum · soil: biology · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

infection · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.