Paper · 2021 · Al-Hayat Journal of Biology and Applied Biology

Deteksi Bakteri Endofit Dan Pengaruh Microbacterium arborescens Terhadap Pertumbuhan Sorgum Manis (Sorghum bicolor)

Riana Nindita Putri

2
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This research aims to detect the presence of potential endophytic bacteria, one of which is Microbacterium arborescens and study the effects on the growth of local variants of sweet sorghum plants from farmers in Sleman, Yogyakarta. This research began with infection of Microbacterium arborescens bacteria on sorghum seeds. Sorghum plants were grown in sterile media for 14 days after germination to observe seven growth parameters, including root length, number of lateral roots, stem length, number of leaves, leaf length, wet weight, and dry weight. Analysis of sweet sorghum growth parameters based on the one way ANOVA statistical test. Samples of infected and uninfected sorghum plants in the roots, stems, and leaves were amplified for the 16s rRNA gene using Bioline PCR hotstart mix. The primers used are universal primer Primer 27 f (59-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-39) and 1492 r (59- TAC GGH TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-39). The root length and number of lateral roots between sweet sorghum with and without Microbacterium arborescens infection showed significant differences. The length of the control roots was 9.24 cm, the treatment plants were 6.38 cm, the control plants had six treatment roots, and the treatment plants had ten lateral roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbacterium arborescens infection reduced sweet sorghum root length (6.38 cm vs 9.24 cm in controls), a significant difference.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
local variantse5
Treatment
Microbacterium arborescens infectione1
Interactor
Microbacterium arborescensMicrobacterium arborescense1symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
6.38 cme2
Qualifier
9.24 cme2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
sterile mediae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The root length and number of lateral roots between sweet sorghum with and without Microbacterium arborescens infection showed significant differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1080 · show in text ↑
e2

“The length of the control roots was 9.24 cm, the treatment plants were 6.38 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1160 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sorghum plants were grown in sterile media for 14 days after germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–397 · show in text ↑
e5

“local variants of sweet sorghum plants from farmers in Sleman, Yogyakarta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbacterium arborescens infection increased the number of lateral roots of sweet sorghum (ten vs six in controls), a significant difference.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Microbacterium arborescens infectione1
Interactor
Microbacterium arborescensMicrobacterium arborescense1symbiont
Outcome
number of lateral rootse1
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
tene3
Comparator
control plantse3
Setting
sterile mediae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The root length and number of lateral roots between sweet sorghum with and without Microbacterium arborescens infection showed significant differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1080 · show in text ↑
e3

“the control plants had six treatment roots, and the treatment plants had ten lateral roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1252 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sorghum plants were grown in sterile media for 14 days after germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–397 · show in text ↑

infection · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.