Paper · 1992 · American Journal of Botany

Anatomical and Metabolic Responses to Waterlogging and Salinity in Spartina alterniflora and S. patens (Poaceae)

G. Naidoo; K. L. McKee; I. A. Mendelssohn

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
53
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of waterlogging and salinity (25 or 325 mol m 3 NaCl) stressors on the anatomy and metabolism of the marsh grasses 5. alterniflora Loisel. and S. patens Aiton (Muhl.) were investigated in a V factorial greenhouse experiment over 30 d. Waterlogging and salinity in combination resulted in anatomical and metabolic responses in both species. Waterlogging reduced soil redox potential and decreased root-specific gravity significantly in both species. The inadequacy of aerenchyma development under hypoxia to support aerobic root respiration in S. patens was indicated by significant increases in root alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity of 1,752% and 420%, respectively, in the low and high salinity treatments. ADH activity was not increased significantly by flooding of S. alterniflora. Proline concentrations in roots and leaves were low at low salinities and increased significantly at high salinities in both species, but only under drained conditions. Decrease in leaf elongation by high salinity occurred in drained, but not flooded treatments in both species. Under flooded conditions, leaf elongation was significantly greater in S. alterniflora than S. patens. Greatest leaf elongation occurred in flooded low salinity S. alterniflora plants that had the least proline. Although both species are adapted to waterlogging and salinity, S. alterniflora appears to be more tolerant of reducing soil conditions and less responsive to higher salinity than S. patens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging and salinity in combination produced anatomical and metabolic responses in both marsh grasses.

Taxon
marsh grassese0
Treatment
Waterlogging and salinity in combinatione1
Outcome
anatomical and metabolic responsese1

Verbatim

e0

“the marsh grasses 5. alterniflora Loisel. and S. patens Aiton (Muhl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e1

“Waterlogging and salinity in combination resulted in anatomical and metabolic responses in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced soil redox potential in both marsh grasses.

Taxon
marsh grassese0
Treatment
Waterlogginge2
Outcome
soil redox potentiale2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the marsh grasses 5. alterniflora Loisel. and S. patens Aiton (Muhl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e2

“Waterlogging reduced soil redox potential and decreased root-specific gravity significantly in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly decreased root-specific gravity in both marsh grasses.

Taxon
marsh grassese0
Treatment
Waterlogginge2
Outcome
root-specific gravitye2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the marsh grasses 5. alterniflora Loisel. and S. patens Aiton (Muhl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e2

“Waterlogging reduced soil redox potential and decreased root-specific gravity significantly in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In S. patens, root ADH activity increased significantly by 1,752% under low salinity with hypoxia.

Taxon
S. patensSporobolus pumiluse3
Treatment
low and high salinity treatmentse3
Outcome
root alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activitye3
Direction
increasese3
Value
1,752%e3
Qualifier
respectivelye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus pumilus
Sporobolus pumilus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAyotte, Gilles, 1948- · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The inadequacy of aerenchyma development under hypoxia to support aerobic root respiration in S. patens was indicated by significant increases in root alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity of 1,752% and 420%, respectively, in the low and high salinity treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In S. patens, root ADH activity increased significantly by 420% under high salinity with hypoxia.

Taxon
S. patensSporobolus pumiluse3
Treatment
high salinitye3
Outcome
root alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activitye3
Direction
increasese3
Value
420%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus pumilus
Sporobolus pumilus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAyotte, Gilles, 1948- · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The inadequacy of aerenchyma development under hypoxia to support aerobic root respiration in S. patens was indicated by significant increases in root alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity of 1,752% and 420%, respectively, in the low and high salinity treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding did not significantly increase root ADH activity in S. alterniflora.

Taxon
S. alternifloraSporobolus alternifloruse4
Treatment
floodinge4
Outcome
ADH activitye4
Direction
not increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus alterniflorus
Sporobolus alterniflorus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“ADH activity was not increased significantly by flooding of S. alterniflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline concentrations in roots and leaves increased at high salinities relative to low salinities in both marsh grasses, only under drained conditions.

Taxon
marsh grassese0
Treatment
high salinitiese5
Outcome
Proline concentrations in roots and leavese5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
only under drained conditionse5
Comparator
low salinitiese5

Verbatim

e0

“the marsh grasses 5. alterniflora Loisel. and S. patens Aiton (Muhl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e5

“Proline concentrations in roots and leaves were low at low salinities and increased significantly at high salinities in both species, but only under drained conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline concentrations in roots and leaves were low at low salinities in both marsh grasses.

Taxon
marsh grassese0
Treatment
low salinitiese5
Outcome
Proline concentrations in roots and leavese5
Direction
lowe5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the marsh grasses 5. alterniflora Loisel. and S. patens Aiton (Muhl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e5

“Proline concentrations in roots and leaves were low at low salinities and increased significantly at high salinities in both species, but only under drained conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High salinity decreased leaf elongation in drained but not flooded treatments in both marsh grasses.

Taxon
marsh grassese0
Treatment
high salinitye6
Outcome
leaf elongatione6
Direction
Decreasee6
Qualifier
drained, but not flooded treatmentse6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the marsh grasses 5. alterniflora Loisel. and S. patens Aiton (Muhl.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–178 · show in text ↑
e6

“Decrease in leaf elongation by high salinity occurred in drained, but not flooded treatments in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under flooded conditions, leaf elongation was significantly greater in S. alterniflora than in S. patens.

Taxon
S. alternifloraSporobolus alternifloruse7
Treatment
flooded conditionse7
Outcome
leaf elongatione7
Direction
greatere7
Comparator
S. patense7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus alterniflorus
Sporobolus alterniflorus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Under flooded conditions, leaf elongation was significantly greater in S. alterniflora than S. patens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1181 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greatest leaf elongation occurred in flooded low-salinity S. alterniflora plants with the least proline.

Taxon
S. alternifloraSporobolus alternifloruse7
Treatment
flooded low salinitye7
Compound
prolinee7
Outcome
leaf elongatione7
Direction
Greateste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus alterniflorus
Sporobolus alterniflorus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Greatest leaf elongation occurred in flooded low salinity S. alterniflora plants that had the least proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1290 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. alterniflora appears more tolerant of reducing soil conditions than S. patens.

Taxon
S. alternifloraSporobolus alternifloruse7
Outcome
tolerant of reducing soil conditionse7
Direction
more tolerante7
Comparator
S. patense7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus alterniflorus
Sporobolus alterniflorus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“S. alterniflora appears to be more tolerant of reducing soil conditions and less responsive to higher salinity than S. patens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1481 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. alterniflora appears less responsive to higher salinity than S. patens.

Taxon
S. alternifloraSporobolus alternifloruse7
Treatment
higher salinitye7
Outcome
responsive to higher salinitye7
Direction
less responsivee7
Comparator
S. patense7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus alterniflorus
Sporobolus alterniflorus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“S. alterniflora appears to be more tolerant of reducing soil conditions and less responsive to higher salinity than S. patens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1481 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Sporobolus alterniflorus (smooth cordgrass)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.