Paper · 2009 · Gulf of Mexico Science

The Effects of Flooding on Four Common Louisiana Marsh Plants

Jenneke M. Visser; Elin R. Sandy

11
claims
13
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The marshes of the Louisiana coastline have been deteriorating for decades as plants experience increasing levels of flooding. In this study, we determined the effects of flood duration on four of the most common marsh plants in Louisiana—Spartina alterniflora, Spartina patens, Panicum hemitomon, and Sagittaria lancifolia—by exposing them to different flooding regimes: 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% of the time flooded. Cumulative plant height, soil redox, and soil pH were measured weekly. At the end of the experiment, above- and belowground biomass were measured. Redox measurements showed that the saturated soil (0% flooded) was slightly depleted of oxygen at a redox potential of 300 mV, whereas oxygen was depleted and nitrate and/or manganese used as electron acceptors in all the flooded treatments (20–100% flooded), which had an average soil redox potential near 200 mV. In the saturated treatment, the soil was slightly acidic (pH average 4.7), whereas the flooded treatments had neutral soil acidity (pH average 7.3). Spartina alterniflora biomass was significantly affected by flooding. Spartina alterniflora biomass in the saturated treatment was approximately twice the biomass achieved in any of the flooding treatments. Spartina patens showed a rapid decline in biomass with increased flood duration, reaching the lowest values in treatments that were flooded more than 50% of the time. Although aboveground biomass of Sagittaria lancifolia was not significantly related to flooding regime, belowground biomass decreased with increased flooding duration. The only species that showed no significant response to flooding duration was P. hemitomon. Our results suggest that wetland restoration techniques that reduce flooding frequency are most appropriate for organic marshes dominated by Spartina patens and Spartina alterniflora, whereas these techniques may be less appropriate for organic marshes dominated by Sagittaria lancifolia and P. hemitomon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturated soil had redox potential of 300 mV.

Outcome
redox potentiale0
Value
300 mVe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the saturated soil (0% flooded) was slightly depleted of oxygen at a redox potential of 300 mV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooded soils averaged near 200 mV redox potential.

Treatment
20–100% floodede0
Outcome
soil redox potentiale0
Value
200 mVe0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“all the flooded treatments (20–100% flooded), which had an average soil redox potential near 200 mV.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–887 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturated soil was slightly acidic at average pH 4.7.

Outcome
soil was slightly acidice0
Value
pH average 4.7e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the saturated treatment, the soil was slightly acidic (pH average 4.7), whereas the flooded treatments had neutral soil acidity (pH average 7.3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1036 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooded soil had neutral acidity at average pH 7.3.

Outcome
neutral soil aciditye0
Value
pH average 7.3e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the saturated treatment, the soil was slightly acidic (pH average 4.7), whereas the flooded treatments had neutral soil acidity (pH average 7.3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spartina alterniflora biomass in saturated soil was about twice that in flooded treatments.

Taxon
Spartina alternifloraSporobolus alternifloruse0
Treatment
flooding treatmentse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
twicee0
Value
twicee0
Comparator
saturated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus alterniflorus
Sporobolus alterniflorus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spartina alterniflora biomass in the saturated treatment was approximately twice the biomass achieved in any of the flooding treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1243 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spartina alterniflora biomass was significantly affected by flooding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spartina patens biomass declined rapidly with longer flooding, lowest above 50% flooded time.

Taxon
Spartina patensSporobolus pumiluse0
Treatment
increased flood duratione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
more than 50% of the timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus pumilus
Sporobolus pumilus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAyotte, Gilles, 1948- · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spartina patens showed a rapid decline in biomass with increased flood duration, reaching the lowest values in treatments that were flooded more than 50% of the time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1410 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sagittaria lancifolia aboveground biomass was not significantly related to flooding regime.

Taxon
Sagittaria lancifoliaSagittaria lancifoliae0
Treatment
flooding regimee0
Outcome
aboveground biomasse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sagittaria lancifolia
Sagittaria lancifolia · TaxonBarnes, Dr. Thomas G. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aboveground biomass of Sagittaria lancifolia was not significantly related to flooding regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1513 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sagittaria lancifolia belowground biomass decreased with flooding duration.

Taxon
Sagittaria lancifoliaSagittaria lancifoliat0
Treatment
increased flooding duratione0
Outcome
belowground biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sagittaria lancifolia
Sagittaria lancifolia · TaxonBarnes, Dr. Thomas G. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“belowground biomass decreased with increased flooding duration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1578 · show in text ↑
t0

“of Sagittaria lancifolia was not significantly related”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1494 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicum hemitomon showed no significant response to flooding duration.

Taxon
P. hemitomonHymenachne hemitomone0
Treatment
flooding duratione0
Outcome
response to flooding duratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hymenachne hemitomon
Hymenachne hemitomon · TaxonRobert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA NRCS. 1995. Northeast wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. Northeast National Technical Center, Chester. Courtesy of · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The only species that showed no significant response to flooding duration was P. hemitomon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1670 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend reducing flooding frequency for organic marshes dominated by Spartina patens and Spartina alterniflora.

Taxon
Spartina patensSporobolus pumiluse0
Outcome
reduce flooding frequencye0
Setting
organic marshese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sporobolus pumilus
Sporobolus pumilus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAyotte, Gilles, 1948- · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wetland restoration techniques that reduce flooding frequency are most appropriate for organic marshes dominated by Spartina patens and Spartina alterniflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1853 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider flood-reduction restoration less appropriate for marshes dominated by Sagittaria lancifolia and P. hemitomon.

Taxon
Sagittaria lancifoliaSagittaria lancifoliae0
Outcome
less appropriatee0
Setting
organic marshese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sagittaria lancifolia
Sagittaria lancifolia · TaxonBarnes, Dr. Thomas G. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these techniques may be less appropriate for organic marshes dominated by Sagittaria lancifolia and P. hemitomon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–1976 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Sporobolus alterniflorus (smooth cordgrass)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.