Paper · 2004 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Physiological Response of Wheat to Foliar Application of Zinc and Inoculation with some Bacterial Fertilizers

Mohsen K. H. Ebrahim; Magda M. Aly

13
claims
34
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In a pot experiment, sterilized sandy soil (irrigated with Long-Ashton nutrient solution containing a half of the recommended dose of ZnSO4 · 7H2O) was used to study the effects of zinc (Zn) foliar-application, and soil biofertilization on some physiological traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155) plant grown for 70 days in greenhouse under controlled conditions. The treatments comprised different levels of the foliar applied Zn (0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 mg L−1) which was added in the form of ZnSO4 · 7H2O, and supported by Azotobacter chroococcum (Ar) and/or Azospirillum brasilense (Am) isolates. All test attributes (minerals, photosynthesis, metabolites, and dry matter accumulation) were significantly enhanced by the moderate doses of Zn (25 and 50 mg L−1), while a contrary trend was observed in case of the higher levels (100 and 200 mg L−1). Applying the bacterial fertilizers (Ar, Am) to the experimental soil, influenced the most test characters in the direction of improving growth, photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation by the plant. This response was more evident in the case of applying Ar plus Am than Am than Ar, particularly, at the elevated levels of Zn. Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Am resulted in the highest shoot contents of nitrogen (N), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), carbohydrate and total-soluble proteins. Superior values of the photosynthetic criteria (Chl a + b concentration and photosystem II activity) as well as shoot concentration of indole-3-acetic acid, and dry matter accumulation by shoots and roots were obtained by the same treatment. The highest phosphorus (P) concentration was achieved at 25 mg L−1 Zn supported by Ar plus Am. Irrespective of the bacterial inoculum, shoot contents of potassium (K) and Zn showed a positive correlation with the sprayed dose of Zn. Keywords: Azospirillum Azotobacter GrowthIndole acetic acidMetabolitesPhotosynthesisproductivity

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate foliar zinc doses significantly enhanced wheat mineral, photosynthesis, metabolite and dry matter traits.

Treatment
moderate doses of Zn (25 and 50 mg L−1)e0
Outcome
minerals, photosynthesis, metabolites, and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All test attributes (minerals, photosynthesis, metabolites, and dry matter accumulation) were significantly enhanced by the moderate doses of Zn (25 and 50 mg L−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–785 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher zinc doses showed the opposite trend for the measured wheat traits.

Treatment
higher levels (100 and 200 mg L−1)e0
Outcome
minerals, photosynthesis, metabolites, and dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
contrary trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a contrary trend was observed in case of the higher levels (100 and 200 mg L−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“All test attributes (minerals, photosynthesis, metabolites, and dry matter accumulation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–710 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter chroococcum application improved wheat growth, photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
bacterial fertilizers (Ar, Am)e0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume1symbiont
Outcome
growth, photosynthesis and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying the bacterial fertilizers (Ar, Am) to the experimental soil, influenced the most test characters in the direction of improving growth, photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation by the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azotobacter chroococcum (Ar) and/or Azospirillum brasilense (Am) isolates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–621 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum brasilense application improved wheat growth, photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
bacterial fertilizers (Ar, Am)e0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
growth, photosynthesis and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying the bacterial fertilizers (Ar, Am) to the experimental soil, influenced the most test characters in the direction of improving growth, photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation by the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azotobacter chroococcum (Ar) and/or Azospirillum brasilense (Am) isolates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–621 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Ar and Am improved wheat responses more than either alone, especially at elevated zinc.

Treatment
Ar plus Ame0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume1symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee1symbiont
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
more evidente0
Comparator
Am than Are0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This response was more evident in the case of applying Ar plus Am than Am than Ar, particularly, at the elevated levels of Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azotobacter chroococcum (Ar) and/or Azospirillum brasilense (Am) isolates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–621 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc at 50 mg L−1 with Ar and Am gave highest wheat shoot nitrogen, magnesium and manganese contents.

Treatment
Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Ame0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume2symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee2symbiont
Outcome
shoot contents of nitrogen (N), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Am resulted in the highest shoot contents of nitrogen (N), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), carbohydrate and total-soluble proteins.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
e2

“Azotobacter chroococcum (Ar) and/or Azospirillum brasilense (Am) isolates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave highest wheat shoot carbohydrate and soluble protein contents.

Treatment
Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Ame0
Outcome
carbohydrate and total-soluble proteinse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Am resulted in the highest shoot contents of nitrogen (N), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), carbohydrate and total-soluble proteins.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 mg L−1 zinc plus Ar and Am treatment gave superior chlorophyll concentration and photosystem II activity.

Treatment
Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Ame1
Outcome
Chl a + b concentration and photosystem II activitye0
Direction
Superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superior values of the photosynthetic criteria (Chl a + b concentration and photosystem II activity) as well as shoot concentration of indole-3-acetic acid, and dry matter accumulation by shoots and roots were obtained by the same treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1652 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Am”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1281 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 mg L−1 zinc plus Ar and Am treatment gave superior wheat shoot indole-3-acetic acid concentration.

Treatment
Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Ame1
Outcome
shoot concentration of indole-3-acetic acide0
Direction
Superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superior values of the photosynthetic criteria (Chl a + b concentration and photosystem II activity) as well as shoot concentration of indole-3-acetic acid, and dry matter accumulation by shoots and roots were obtained by the same treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1652 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Am”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1281 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 mg L−1 zinc plus Ar and Am treatment gave superior wheat shoot and root dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Ame1
Outcome
dry matter accumulation by shoots and rootse0
Direction
Superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superior values of the photosynthetic criteria (Chl a + b concentration and photosystem II activity) as well as shoot concentration of indole-3-acetic acid, and dry matter accumulation by shoots and roots were obtained by the same treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1652 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc application at 50 mg L−1 supported by the biofertilization with Ar plus Am”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1281 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc at 25 mg L−1 with Ar and Am gave the highest wheat phosphorus concentration.

Treatment
25 mg L−1 Zn supported by Ar plus Ame0
Outcome
phosphorus (P) concentratione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest phosphorus (P) concentration was achieved at 25 mg L−1 Zn supported by Ar plus Am.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1747 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot potassium content rose with sprayed zinc dose regardless of bacterial inoculum.

Treatment
sprayed dose of Zne0
Outcome
shoot contents of potassium (K)e0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrespective of the bacterial inoculum, shoot contents of potassium (K) and Zn showed a positive correlation with the sprayed dose of Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1885 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot zinc content rose with sprayed zinc dose regardless of bacterial inoculum.

Treatment
sprayed dose of Zne0
Outcome
shoot contents of potassium (K) and Zne0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrespective of the bacterial inoculum, shoot contents of potassium (K) and Zn showed a positive correlation with the sprayed dose of Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1885 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 155)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–317 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

zinc atom · Azotobacter chroococcum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: hormones · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

8 of 19 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.