Abstract
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation enhances grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] yield, but infl uence on grain quality has not been measured.The objective was to determine the effect of cropping sequence (CS) and soil amendment (SA) on grain yield and quality.Sorghum grain yield and quality, soil NO 3 -N and water were measured in a rotation study in 2003 and 2004 on a Sharpsburg silty clay loam (fi ne, smectitic, mesic Typic Argiudoll).Cropping sequences were continuous sorghum, and sorghum rotated with non-nodulating and nodulating soybean.Soil amendments consisted of no amendment, manure (17-26 Mg dry matter ha -1 yr -1 ), and N (84 kg ha -1 yr -1 ).CS × SA interaction effects were found for most parameters.Rotation with non-nodulating soybean without SA increased yield by 2.6 to 2.8 Mg ha -1 over continuous sorghum without SA.Rotation without SA with nodulating soybean further increased yield by 1.7 to 1.8 Mg ha -1 over rotation with non-nodulating soybean.Grain N increased by 0.5 to 1.0, 2.5 to 5.0, and 3.3 to 4.9 g kg -1 for N application to continuous sorghum and sorghum rotated with non-nodulating and nodulating soybean, respectively.Tangential abrasive dehulling device (TADD) removal indicated that continuous sorghum without SA produced the softest grain with 43 to 44% TADD removal, and sorghum rotated with nodulating soybean with manure produced the hardest grain with 22 to 27% TADD removal.As food end-use opportunities for sorghum grain evolve, use of crop rotation and SA application will be important to produce grain with desirable quality attributes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence and soil amendment interacted for most parameters.
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CS × SA interaction effects were found for most parameters”
t0“Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Non-nodulating soybean rotation without amendment raised sorghum yield by 2.6 to 2.8 Mg ha -1.
- Treatment
- Rotation with non-nodulating soybean without SAe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.6 to 2.8 Mg ha -1e0
- Comparator
- continuous sorghum without SAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rotation with non-nodulating soybean without SA increased yield by 2.6 to 2.8 Mg ha -1 over continuous sorghum without SA”
Claim · model-written summary
Nodulating soybean rotation without amendment further raised sorghum yield by 1.7 to 1.8 Mg ha -1.
- Treatment
- Rotation without SA with nodulating soybeane0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 1.7 to 1.8 Mg ha -1e0
- Comparator
- rotation with non-nodulating soybeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rotation without SA with nodulating soybean further increased yield by 1.7 to 1.8 Mg ha -1 over rotation with non-nodulating soybean”
t0“Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application raised grain N in continuous sorghum by 0.5 to 1.0 g kg -1.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain N increased by 0.5 to 1.0, 2.5 to 5.0, and 3.3 to 4.9 g kg -1 for N application to continuous sorghum and sorghum rotated with non-nodulating and nodulating soybean, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application raised grain N in sorghum rotated with non-nodulating soybean by 2.5 to 5.0 g kg -1.
- Treatment
- N applicatione0
- Outcome
- Grain Ne0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.5 to 5.0e0
- Qualifier
- sorghum rotated with non-nodulatinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain N increased by 0.5 to 1.0, 2.5 to 5.0, and 3.3 to 4.9 g kg -1 for N application to continuous sorghum and sorghum rotated with non-nodulating and nodulating soybean, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen application raised grain N in sorghum rotated with nodulating soybean by 3.3 to 4.9 g kg -1.
- Treatment
- N applicatione0
- Outcome
- Grain Ne0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.3 to 4.9 g kg -1e0
- Qualifier
- nodulating soybeane0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain N increased by 0.5 to 1.0, 2.5 to 5.0, and 3.3 to 4.9 g kg -1 for N application to continuous sorghum and sorghum rotated with non-nodulating and nodulating soybean, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Continuous sorghum without amendment had the softest grain, with 43 to 44% TADD removal.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“continuous sorghum without SA produced the softest grain with 43 to 44% TADD removal”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum rotated with nodulating soybean and manure had the hardest grain, with 22 to 27% TADD removal.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sorghum rotated with nodulating soybean with manure produced the hardest grain with 22 to 27% TADD removal”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors recommend rotation and soil amendments to produce desirable sorghum grain quality.
- Outcome
- use of crop rotation and SA applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“use of crop rotation and SA application will be important to produce grain with desirable quality attributes”
t0“Sorghum”
The same questions in other papers
Glycine max · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →salicylic acid · yield · SorghumResults agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →rotation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.