Paper · 2007 · Crop Science

Crop Rotation and Soil Amendment Alters Sorghum Grain Quality

Nanga Mady Kaye; Stephen C. Mason; David S. Jackson; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation enhances grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] yield, but influence on grain quality has not been measured. The objective was to determine the effect of cropping sequence (CS) and soil amendment (SA) on grain yield and quality. Sorghum grain yield and quality, soil NO 3 –N and water were measured in a rotation study in 2003 and 2004 on a Sharpsburg silty clay loam (fine, smectitic, mesic Typic Argiudoll). Cropping sequences were continuous sorghum, and sorghum rotated with non‐nodulating and nodulating soybean. Soil amendments consisted of no amendment, manure (17–26 Mg dry matter ha −1 yr −1 ), and N (84 kg ha −1 yr −1 ). CS × SA interaction effects were found for most parameters. Rotation with non‐nodulating soybean without SA increased yield by 2.6 to 2.8 Mg ha −1 over continuous sorghum without SA. Rotation without SA with nodulating soybean further increased yield by 1.7 to 1.8 Mg ha −1 over rotation with non‐nodulating soybean. Grain N increased by 0.5 to 1.0, 2.5 to 5.0, and 3.3 to 4.9 g kg −1 for N application to continuous sorghum and sorghum rotated with non‐nodulating and nodulating soybean, respectively. Tangential abrasive dehulling device (TADD) removal indicated that continuous sorghum without SA produced the softest grain with 43 to 44% TADD removal, and sorghum rotated with nodulating soybean with manure produced the hardest grain with 22 to 27% TADD removal. As food end‐use opportunities for sorghum grain evolve, use of crop rotation and SA application will be important to produce grain with desirable quality attributes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interaction effects of cropping sequence and soil amendment were found for most sorghum parameters measured.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
CS × SA interaction effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CS × SA interaction effects were found for most parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation with non-nodulating soybean without soil amendment increased sorghum yield by 2.6 to 2.8 Mg per ha over continuous sorghum without amendment.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Rotation with non‐nodulating soybean without SAe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.6 to 2.8 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
continuous sorghum without SAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rotation with non‐nodulating soybean without SA increased yield by 2.6 to 2.8 Mg ha −1 over continuous sorghum without SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation without amendment with nodulating soybean further increased sorghum yield by 1.7 to 1.8 Mg per ha over rotation with non-nodulating soybean.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Rotation without SA with nodulating soybeane0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
further increasede0
Value
1.7 to 1.8 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
rotation with non‐nodulating soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rotation without SA with nodulating soybean further increased yield by 1.7 to 1.8 Mg ha −1 over rotation with non‐nodulating soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased grain N by 0.5 to 1.0 g per kg in continuous sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
Grain Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.5 to 1.0e0
Qualifier
continuous sorghume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain N increased by 0.5 to 1.0, 2.5 to 5.0, and 3.3 to 4.9 g kg −1 for N application to continuous sorghum and sorghum rotated with non‐nodulating and nodulating soybean, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased grain N by 2.5 to 5.0 g per kg in sorghum rotated with non-nodulating soybean.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
Grain Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.5 to 5.0e0
Qualifier
rotated with non‐nodulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain N increased by 0.5 to 1.0, 2.5 to 5.0, and 3.3 to 4.9 g kg −1 for N application to continuous sorghum and sorghum rotated with non‐nodulating and nodulating soybean, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased grain N by 3.3 to 4.9 g per kg in sorghum rotated with nodulating soybean.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
Grain Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.3 to 4.9 g kg −1e0
Qualifier
nodulating soybeane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain N increased by 0.5 to 1.0, 2.5 to 5.0, and 3.3 to 4.9 g kg −1 for N application to continuous sorghum and sorghum rotated with non‐nodulating and nodulating soybean, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1191 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous sorghum without amendment produced the softest grain, with 43 to 44% TADD removal.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
softest graine0
Value
43 to 44%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous sorghum without SA produced the softest grain with 43 to 44% TADD removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1344 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum rotated with nodulating soybean with manure produced the hardest grain, with 22 to 27% TADD removal.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
hardest graine0
Value
22 to 27%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum rotated with nodulating soybean with manure produced the hardest grain with 22 to 27% TADD removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1456 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that crop rotation and soil amendment will be important for producing sorghum grain with desirable quality attributes.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
desirable quality attributese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of crop rotation and SA application will be important to produce grain with desirable quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · SorghumResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

rotation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.