Paper · 2022 · Acta Horticulturae

Influence of red:blue ratio in LED lighting for indoor cultivation of edible marigold flowers

A. Pistillo; G. Pennisi; A. Crepaldi; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Edible flowers are becoming increasingly important for human consumption due to their capability to make food more attractive and tastier. Furthermore, edible flowers are receiving renewed interest from consumers as a source of bioactive compounds with beneficial health effects. LED lighting technologies are gaining increasing relevance as they allow indoor plant cultivation, where both environmental parameters and lighting characteristics can be effectively adapted to plant needs, promoting flower induction and plant productivity. In the present study, five LED light treatments characterized by varying red:blue (RB)ratio (RB0.5, RB1, RB2, RB3, RB4) were compared for their effects on both the growth and morphogenesis of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.). Cool fluorescent light (FL) was also considered as control. Marigold plants were cultivated in growth chambers (24°C, 60% RH) and supplied with a Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density (PPFD) of 215 μmol m-2 s-1 with a photoperiod of 16 h d-1. Flower induction was increased by LED lighting as compared with control, reaching maximum values under RB≥2. Flower production (g plant-1) was also affected by changes in light spectrum, with the highest values in plants grown under RB≥2. Significant variations on the energy use efficiency (expressed as the electricity requirements per unit of fresh flower produced) were also associated with changes in RB ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED lighting increased flower induction versus fluorescent control, with maximum values under RB≥2.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
LED lightinge0
Outcome
Flower inductione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
RB≥2e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Flower induction was increased by LED lighting as compared with control, reaching maximum values under RB≥2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower production was highest under RB≥2.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
RB≥2e0
Outcome
Flower productione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Flower production (g plant-1) was also affected by changes in light spectrum, with the highest values in plants grown under RB≥2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy use efficiency varied significantly with red to blue ratio.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
RB ratioe0
Outcome
energy use efficiencye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Significant variations on the energy use efficiency (expressed as the electricity requirements per unit of fresh flower produced) were also associated with changes in RB ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“marigold flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–93 · show in text ↑

light · phenology · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.