Paper · 2022 · Microorganisms

Synergistic Plant-Microbe Interactions between Endophytic Actinobacteria and Their Role in Plant Growth Promotion and Biological Control of Cotton under Salt Stress

Osama Abdalla Abdelshafy Mohamad; Yong-Hong Liu; Li Li; et al.

15
claims
42
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bacterial endophytes are well-acknowledged inoculants to promote plant growth and enhance their resistance toward various pathogens and environmental stresses. In the present study, 71 endophytic strains associated with the medicinal plant Thymus roseus were screened for their plant growth promotion (PGP), and the applicability of potent strains as bioinoculant has been evaluated. Regarding PGP traits, the percentage of strains were positive for the siderophore production (84%), auxin synthesis (69%), diazotrophs (76%), phosphate solubilization (79%), and production of lytic enzymes (i.e., cellulase (64%), lipase (62%), protease (61%), chitinase (34%), and displayed antagonistic activity against Verticillium dahliae (74%) in vitro. The inoculation of strain XIEG05 and XIEG12 enhanced plant tolerance to salt stress significantly (p < 0.05) through the promotion of shoot, root development, and reduced the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, and CAT), compared with uninoculated controls in vivo. Furthermore, inoculation of strain XIEG57 was capable of reducing cotton disease incidence (DI) symptoms caused by V. dahliae at all tested salt concentrations. The GC-MS analysis showed that many compounds are known to have antimicrobial and antifungal activity. Our findings provide valuable information for applying strains XIEG05 and XIEG12 as bioinoculant fertilizers and biological control agent of cotton under saline soil conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among endophytic strains, 84% produced siderophores.

Taxon
Thymus roseusThymus roseust0
Interactor
endophytic strainst1symbiont
Outcome
siderophore productione0
Value
84%e0

Verbatim

e0

“siderophore production (84%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–253 · show in text ↑
t1

“endophytic strains associated with the medicinal plant Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among endophytic strains, 69% synthesized auxin.

Taxon
Thymus roseusThymus roseust0
Interactor
endophytic strainst1symbiont
Outcome
auxin synthesise0
Value
69%e0

Verbatim

e0

“auxin synthesis (69%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–253 · show in text ↑
t1

“endophytic strains associated with the medicinal plant Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among endophytic strains, 76% were diazotrophs.

Taxon
Thymus roseusThymus roseust0
Interactor
endophytic strainst1symbiont
Outcome
diazotrophse0
Value
76%e0

Verbatim

e0

“diazotrophs (76%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–253 · show in text ↑
t1

“endophytic strains associated with the medicinal plant Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among endophytic strains, 79% solubilized phosphate.

Taxon
Thymus roseusThymus roseust0
Interactor
endophytic strainst1symbiont
Outcome
phosphate solubilizatione0
Value
79%e0

Verbatim

e0

“phosphate solubilization (79%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–253 · show in text ↑
t1

“endophytic strains associated with the medicinal plant Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among endophytic strains, 64% produced cellulase.

Taxon
Thymus roseusThymus roseust0
Interactor
endophytic strainst1symbiont
Outcome
cellulasee0
Value
64%e0

Verbatim

e0

“cellulase (64%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–253 · show in text ↑
t1

“endophytic strains associated with the medicinal plant Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among endophytic strains, 62% produced lipase.

Taxon
Thymus roseusThymus roseust0
Interactor
endophytic strainst1symbiont
Outcome
lipasee0
Value
62%e0

Verbatim

e0

“lipase (62%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–253 · show in text ↑
t1

“endophytic strains associated with the medicinal plant Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among endophytic strains, 61% produced protease.

Taxon
Thymus roseusThymus roseust0
Interactor
endophytic strainst1symbiont
Outcome
proteasee0
Value
61%e0

Verbatim

e0

“protease (61%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–253 · show in text ↑
t1

“endophytic strains associated with the medicinal plant Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among endophytic strains, 34% produced chitinase.

Taxon
Thymus roseusThymus roseust0
Interactor
endophytic strainst1symbiont
Outcome
chitinasee0
Value
34%e0

Verbatim

e0

“chitinase (34%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–253 · show in text ↑
t1

“endophytic strains associated with the medicinal plant Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among endophytic strains, 74% antagonized Verticillium dahliae in vitro.

Taxon
Thymus roseusThymus roseust0
Interactor
Verticillium dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee0pathogen
Second interactor
endophytic strainst1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic activity against Verticillium dahliaee0
Value
74%e0
Setting
in vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“displayed antagonistic activity against Verticillium dahliae (74%) in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–253 · show in text ↑
t1

“endophytic strains associated with the medicinal plant Thymus roseus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

XIEG05 inoculation significantly enhanced salt tolerance and shoot and root development.

Treatment
inoculation of strain XIEG05e0
Interactor
strain XIEG05e0symbiont
Outcome
plant tolerance to salt stresse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlst1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation of strain XIEG05 and XIEG12 enhanced plant tolerance to salt stress significantly (p < 0.05) through the promotion of shoot, root development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–146 · show in text ↑
t1

“compared with uninoculated controls in vivo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

XIEG12 inoculation significantly enhanced salt tolerance and shoot and root development.

Treatment
XIEG12e0
Interactor
XIEG12e0symbiont
Outcome
plant tolerance to salt stresse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlst1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation of strain XIEG05 and XIEG12 enhanced plant tolerance to salt stress significantly (p < 0.05) through the promotion of shoot, root development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–146 · show in text ↑
t1

“compared with uninoculated controls in vivo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

XIEG05 inoculation reduced antioxidant enzyme activities.

Treatment
strain XIEG05t1
Interactor
strain XIEG05t1symbiont
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, and CAT)e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, and CAT), compared with uninoculated controls in vivo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–146 · show in text ↑
t1

“inoculation of strain XIEG05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

XIEG12 inoculation reduced antioxidant enzyme activities.

Treatment
XIEG12t1
Interactor
XIEG12t1symbiont
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, and CAT)e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, and CAT), compared with uninoculated controls in vivo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–146 · show in text ↑
t1

“inoculation of strain XIEG05 and XIEG12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

XIEG57 inoculation reduced cotton disease incidence caused by V. dahliae at all tested salt concentrations.

Treatment
inoculation of strain XIEG57e0
Interactor
V. dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee0pathogen
Second interactor
strain XIEG57e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
cotton disease incidence (DI) symptoms caused by V. dahliaee0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
at all tested salt concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of strain XIEG57 was capable of reducing cotton disease incidence (DI) symptoms caused by V. dahliae at all tested salt concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1176 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GC-MS detected many compounds described as antimicrobial and antifungal.

Outcome
many compounds are known to have antimicrobial and antifungal activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The GC-MS analysis showed that many compounds are known to have antimicrobial and antifungal activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–146 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Verticillium dahliae · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 18 positive, 24 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.