Paper · 1997 · Phytopathology

Formation of Sclerotia and Aflatoxins in Developing Cotton Bolls Infected by the S Strain of Aspergillus flavus and Potential for Biocontrol with an Atoxigenic Strain

R. K. Garber; P. J. Cotty

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
95
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aspergillus flavus can be divided into the S and L strains on the basis of sclerotial morphology. On average, S strain isolates produce greater quantities of aflatoxins than do L strain isolates. Sclerotia of the S strain were observed in commercial seed cotton from western Arizona. Greenhouse tests were performed to better define sclerotial formation in developing bolls. Eight S strain isolates were inoculated into developing bolls via simulated pink bollworm exit holes. All eight isolates formed sclerotia on locule surfaces, and seven of eight isolates produced sclerotia within developing seed. Boll age at inoculation influences formation of sclerotia. More sclerotia formed within bolls that were less than 31 days old at inoculation than in bolls older than 30 days at inoculation. Frequent formation of sclerotia during boll infection may both favor S strain success within cotton fields and increase toxicity of A. flavus-infected cottonseed. Atoxigenic A. flavus L strain isolate AF36 reduced formation of both sclerotia and aflatoxin when coinoculated with S strain isolates. AF36 formed no sclerotia in developing bolls and was more effective at preventing S strain isolates than L strain isolates from contaminating developing cottonseed with aflatoxins. The use of atoxigenic L strain isolates to prevent contamination through competitive exclusion may be particularly effective where S strain isolates are common. In addition to aflatoxin reduction, competitive exclusion of S strain isolates by L strain isolates may result in reduced overwintering by S strain isolates and lower toxicity resulting from sclerotial metabolites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sclerotia of the S strain were observed in commercial seed cotton from western Arizona.

Taxon
seed cottone1
Material
S straine1
Outcome
Sclerotiae1
Setting
western Arizonae1

Verbatim

e1

“Sclerotia of the S strain were observed in commercial seed cotton from western Arizona”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All eight S strain isolates formed sclerotia on locule surfaces after inoculation into developing cotton bolls.

Material
S straine1
Treatment
inoculated into developing bolls via simulated pink bollworm exit holese1
Outcome
sclerotia on locule surfacese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight S strain isolates were inoculated into developing bolls via simulated pink bollworm exit holes. All eight isolates formed sclerotia on locule surfaces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developing Cotton Bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven of eight S strain isolates produced sclerotia within developing cotton seed.

Outcome
sclerotia within developing seede1
Value
seven of eighte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All eight isolates formed sclerotia on locule surfaces, and seven of eight isolates produced sclerotia within developing seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developing Cotton Bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sclerotia formed more in cotton bolls less than 31 days old at inoculation than in bolls older than 30 days.

Treatment
less than 31 days old at inoculatione1
Outcome
formation of sclerotiae1
Direction
Moree1
Comparator
older than 30 days at inoculatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Boll age at inoculation influences formation of sclerotia. More sclerotia formed within bolls that were less than 31 days old at inoculation than in bolls older than 30 days at inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developing Cotton Bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The atoxigenic L strain isolate AF36 reduced sclerotia and aflatoxin formation when coinoculated with S strain isolates in cotton bolls.

Treatment
Atoxigenic A. flavus L strain isolate AF36e1
Interactor
S strain isolatese1pathogen
Second interactor
Atoxigenic A. flavus L strain isolate AF36e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
formation of both sclerotia and aflatoxine1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Atoxigenic A. flavus L strain isolate AF36 reduced formation of both sclerotia and aflatoxin when coinoculated with S strain isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developing Cotton Bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AF36 formed no sclerotia in developing cotton bolls.

Material
AF36e1
Outcome
formed no sclerotiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“AF36 formed no sclerotia in developing bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developing Cotton Bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AF36 was more effective than L strain isolates at preventing aflatoxin contamination of developing cottonseed by S strain isolates.

Treatment
AF36e1
Interactor
S strain isolatese1pathogen
Second interactor
AF36e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
contaminating developing cottonseed with aflatoxinse1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
L strain isolatese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“AF36 formed no sclerotia in developing bolls and was more effective at preventing S strain isolates than L strain isolates from contaminating developing cottonseed with aflatoxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developing Cotton Bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that atoxigenic L strain isolates may be particularly effective where S strain isolates are common.

Outcome
use of atoxigenic L strain isolates to prevent contamination through competitive exclusione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The use of atoxigenic L strain isolates to prevent contamination through competitive exclusion may be particularly effective where S strain isolates are common”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developing Cotton Bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Competitive exclusion by L strain isolates may reduce overwintering of S strain isolates and lower sclerotial toxicity.

Outcome
reduced overwintering by S strain isolatese1
Qualifier
competitive exclusione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“competitive exclusion of S strain isolates by L strain isolates may result in reduced overwintering by S strain isolates and lower toxicity resulting from sclerotial metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Developing Cotton Bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 · show in text ↑

Aspergillus flavus · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 18 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.