Paper · 2022 · Ecological Applications

Early‐season plant cover supports more effective pest control than insecticide applications

Elizabeth K. Rowen; Kirsten A. Pearsons; Richard G. Smith; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that conservation agricultural practices, like no-till and cover crops, help protect annual crops from insect pests by supporting populations of resident arthropod predators. While adoption of conservation practices is growing, most field crop producers are also using more insecticides, including neonicotinoid seed coatings, as insurance against early-season insect pests. This tactic may disrupt benefits associated with conservation practices by reducing arthropods that contribute to biological control. We investigated the interaction between preventive pest management (PPM) and the conservation practice of cover cropping. We also investigated an alternative pest management approach, integrated pest management (IPM), which responds to insect pest risk, rather than using insecticides prophylactically. In a 3-year corn (Zea mays mays L.)-soy (Glycine max L.) rotation, we measured the response of invertebrate pests and predators to PPM and IPM with and without a cover crop. Using any insecticide provided some small reduction to plant damage in soy, but no yield benefit. In corn, vegetative cover early in the season was key to reducing pest density and damage, likely by increasing the abundance of arthropod predators. Further, PPM in year 1 decreased predation compared to a no-pest-management control. Contrary to our expectation, the IPM strategy, which required just one insecticide application, was more disruptive to the predator community than PPM, likely because the applied pyrethroid was more acutely toxic to a wider range of arthropods than neonicotinoids. Promoting early-season cover was more effective at reducing pest density and damage than either intervention-based strategy. Our results suggest that the best pest management outcomes may occur when biological control is encouraged by planting cover crops and avoiding broad-spectrum insecticides as much as possible. As part of a conservation-based approach to farming, cover crops can promote natural-enemy populations that can help provide biological effective control of insect pest populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide use slightly reduced plant damage in soy.

Taxon
soye0
Treatment
any insecticidee0
Outcome
plant damagee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Using any insecticide provided some small reduction to plant damage in soy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide use provided no yield benefit in soy.

Taxon
soye0
Treatment
any insecticidee0
Outcome
yield benefite0
Direction
noe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Using any insecticide provided some small reduction to plant damage in soy, but no yield benefit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early vegetative cover reduced pest density in corn.

Treatment
vegetative cover early in the seasone0
Outcome
pest densitye0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In corn, vegetative cover early in the season was key to reducing pest density and damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early vegetative cover reduced pest damage in corn.

Treatment
vegetative cover early in the seasone0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In corn, vegetative cover early in the season was key to reducing pest density and damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPM in year 1 decreased predation relative to no pest management.

Treatment
PPM in year 1e0
Outcome
predatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
no-pest-management controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PPM in year 1 decreased predation compared to a no-pest-management control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1343 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays mays L.)-soy (Glycine max L.) rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM disrupted the predator community more than PPM.

Treatment
IPM strategye0
Outcome
predator communitye0
Direction
more disruptivee0
Comparator
PPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the IPM strategy, which required just one insecticide application, was more disruptive to the predator community than PPM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1495 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays mays L.)-soy (Glycine max L.) rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-season cover reduced pest density more effectively than intervention strategies.

Treatment
Promoting early-season covere0
Outcome
pest densitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
either intervention-based strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Promoting early-season cover was more effective at reducing pest density and damage than either intervention-based strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1733 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays mays L.)-soy (Glycine max L.) rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-season cover reduced pest damage more effectively than intervention strategies.

Treatment
Promoting early-season covere0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
either intervention-based strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Promoting early-season cover was more effective at reducing pest density and damage than either intervention-based strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1733 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays mays L.)-soy (Glycine max L.) rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–903 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend cover crops and avoiding broad-spectrum insecticides for pest management.

Outcome
planting cover crops and avoiding broad-spectrum insecticides as much as possiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“best pest management outcomes may occur when biological control is encouraged by planting cover crops and avoiding broad-spectrum insecticides as much as possible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1926 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays mays L.)-soy (Glycine max L.) rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–903 · show in text ↑

ipm · ecology: diversity · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

climate site · pest · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.