Paper · 2021 · Applied Sciences

Biological Diabrotica Management and Monitoring of Metarhizium Diversity in Austrian Maize Fields Following Mass Application of the Entomopathogen Metarhizium brunneum

Maria Zottele; Johanna Mayerhofer; Hannah Embleton; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Inundative mass application of Metarhizium brunneum BIPESCO 5 (Hypocreales, Clavicipitaceae) is used for the biological control of Diabrotica v. virgifera (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Long-term field trials were performed in three Austrian maize fields—with different cultivation techniques and infestation rates—in order to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment to control the pest larvae. In addition, the indigenous Metarhizium spp. population structure was assessed to compare the different field sites with BIPESCO 5 mass application. Annual application of the product Granmet-PTM (Metarhizium colonized barley kernels) significantly increased the density of Metarhizium spp. in the treated soil above the upper natural background level of 1000 colony forming units per gram dry weight soil. Although a decrease in the pest population over time was not achieved in heavily infested areas, less damage occurred in treated field sites in comparison to control sites. The Metarhizium population structure was significantly different between the treated field sites. Results showed that inundative mass application should be repeated regularly to achieve good persistence of the biological control agent, and indicated that despite intensive applications, indigenous populations of Metarhizium spp. can coexist in these habitats. To date, crop rotation remains the method of choice for pest reduction in Europe, however continuous and preventive application of M. brunneum may also present an alternative for the successful biological control of Diabrotica.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual Granmet-PTM increased soil Metarhizium above natural background.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Granmet-PTMe0
Interactor
Metarhizium spp.Metarhiziume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
density of Metarhizium spp. in the treated soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1000 colony forming units per gram dry weight soile0
Comparator
upper natural background levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium
Metarhizium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorydivision, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Annual application of the product Granmet-PTM (Metarhizium colonized barley kernels) significantly increased the density of Metarhizium spp. in the treated soil above the upper natural background level of 1000 colony forming units per gram dry weight soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavily infested areas showed no pest population decrease over time.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
pest populatione0
Direction
not achievede0
Qualifier
heavily infested arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in the pest population over time was not achieved in heavily infested areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated field sites had less damage than controls.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
treated field sitese0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
control sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less damage occurred in treated field sites in comparison to control sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metarhizium population structure differed between treated field sites.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
MetarhiziumMetarhiziume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Metarhizium population structuree0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium
Metarhizium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorydivision, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Metarhizium population structure was significantly different between the treated field sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated mass application is recommended for agent persistence.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
mass application should be repeated regularlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inundative mass application should be repeated regularly to achieve good persistence of the biological control agent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indigenous Metarhizium populations can coexist despite intensive applications.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Metarhizium spp.Metarhiziume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
indigenous populations of Metarhizium spp. can coexiste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium
Metarhizium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorydivision, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite intensive applications, indigenous populations of Metarhizium spp. can coexist in these habitats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous preventive M. brunneum application may be an alternative for Diabrotica control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
DiabroticaDiabroticae0pest
Second interactor
M. brunneumMetarhizium brunneume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
continuous and preventive application of M. brunneume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diabrotica
Diabrotica · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous and preventive application of M. brunneum may also present an alternative for the successful biological control of Diabrotica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑

climate site · pest · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.