Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Impact of Biochar on Rhizosphere Bacterial Diversity Restoration Following Chloropicrin Fumigation of Planted Soil

Jun Li; Yan Chen; Xiangyang Qin; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Chloropicrin (CP) can effectively combat soil-borne diseases but has significant side effects on nontarget microorganisms. The rhizosphere microflora play a crucial role in promoting plant growth and protecting plants from infection by soil-borne pathogens. We conducted a laboratory pot experiment to evaluate the effect of CP on the rhizosphere soil bacterial flora and the effect of biochar amendments on the reconstruction of microbial communities. Our results show that CP fumigation and biochar additions promoted the growth of cucumber plants in the later stage of the pot experiment. CP significantly inhibited the rhizobacterial diversity and changed the community composition. Biochar amendments after CP fumigation shortened the time for the rhizobacterial diversity to recover to unfumigated levels. Biochar amendments promoted the transplantation of new populations to empty microbiome niches that were caused by CP and, in particular, stimulated many beneficial microorganisms to become the predominant flora. The relative abundances of many functional taxa related to plant-disease suppressiveness and pollutant bioremediation increased, including Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Bacillus, Massilia, Acinetobacter, Delftia, Micromonospora, Cytophagaceae, and Flavisolibacter. These changes stimulated by biochar amendments would promote multifunctionality in the soil rhizosphere and benefit plant growth and disease resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CP fumigation promoted later cucumber growth.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
CP fumigatione0
Outcome
growth of cucumber plantse0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
later stage of the pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results show that CP fumigation and biochar additions promoted the growth of cucumber plants in the later stage of the pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

biochar additions promoted later cucumber growth.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
biochar additionse0
Outcome
growth of cucumber plantse0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
later stage of the pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results show that CP fumigation and biochar additions promoted the growth of cucumber plants in the later stage of the pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CP significantly inhibited cucumber rhizobacterial diversity.

Taxon
Planted Soilt0
Treatment
CPe0
Outcome
rhizobacterial diversitye0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CP significantly inhibited the rhizobacterial diversity and changed the community composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Planted Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CP changed cucumber rhizobacterial community composition.

Taxon
Planted Soilt0
Treatment
CPe0
Outcome
community compositione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“CP significantly inhibited the rhizobacterial diversity and changed the community composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Planted Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar after CP fumigation shortened rhizobacterial diversity recovery time.

Taxon
Planted Soilt0
Treatment
Biochar amendments after CP fumigatione0
Outcome
time for the rhizobacterial diversity to recovere0
Direction
shortenede0
Comparator
unfumigated levelse0

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar amendments after CP fumigation shortened the time for the rhizobacterial diversity to recover to unfumigated levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“Planted Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar promoted new populations in empty rhizosphere niches.

Taxon
Planted Soilt0
Treatment
Biochar amendmentse0
Outcome
transplantation of new populations to empty microbiome nichese0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar amendments promoted the transplantation of new populations to empty microbiome niches that were caused by CP and, in particular, stimulated many beneficial microorganisms to become the predominant flora.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Planted Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar stimulated beneficial microorganisms to predominate.

Taxon
Planted Soilt0
Treatment
Biochar amendmentse0
Outcome
beneficial microorganisms to become the predominant florae0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar amendments promoted the transplantation of new populations to empty microbiome niches that were caused by CP and, in particular, stimulated many beneficial microorganisms to become the predominant flora.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Planted Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative abundances of functional disease suppressive and bioremediation taxa increased.

Taxon
Planted Soilt0
Outcome
relative abundances of many functional taxae0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“The relative abundances of many functional taxa related to plant-disease suppressiveness and pollutant bioremediation increased, including Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Bacillus, Massilia, Acinetobacter, Delftia, Micromonospora, Cytophagaceae, and Flavisolibacter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Planted Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer biochar driven microbial changes would benefit plant growth and disease resistance.

Taxon
Planted Soilt0
Treatment
biochar amendmentse0
Outcome
plant growth and disease resistancee0
Qualifier
would promote multifunctionality in the soil rhizospheree0

Verbatim

e0

“These changes stimulated by biochar amendments would promote multifunctionality in the soil rhizosphere and benefit plant growth and disease resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Planted Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–114 · show in text ↑

solarization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

biochar · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.