Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Response of Organic Manure and Azotobacter on Quality and Leaf Nutrient Status of Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) Cv. Winter Dawn

G. Chandramohan Reddy; R. K. Goyal; A. K. Godara

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during two subsequent years, i.e., 2017-18 and 2018-19 at the Department of Horticulture, Hisar with aim to study the effect of organic manures and Azotobacter on quality and leaf nutrient status of strawberry cv. Winter Dawn under hi-tech greenhouse conditions of Haryana. In this experiment, organic manures in combination with biofertilizers comprised of nine treatments, viz., T1: Sand: FYM (3:1), T2: Sand: FYM (2:1), T3: Sand: Vermicompost (3:1), T4: Sand: Vermicompost (2:1), T5: Sand: FYM (3:1) + Azotobacter, T6: Sand: FYM (2:1) + Azotobacter, T7: Sand: Vermicompost (3:1) + Azotobacter. T8: Sand: Vermicompost (2:1) + Azotobacter and T9: Control (Sand); were tested as potting media in complete randomized block design. Maximum TSS, ascorbic acid, anthocyanin content and minimum acidity content and leaf with maximum N, P and K content were observed under sand: vermicompost (2:1) + Azotobacter in comparison to the other treatments. The results of this experiment revealed that, the combination of sand: vermicompost (2:1) with Azotobacter showed significant influence on leaf nutrient content of strawberry and produced better results with respect to quality of strawberry fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand: vermicompost (2:1) plus Azotobacter produced maximum strawberry TSS, ascorbic acid and anthocyanin content versus other treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
sand: vermicompost (2:1) + Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
TSS, ascorbic acid, anthocyanin contente0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum TSS, ascorbic acid, anthocyanin content and minimum acidity content and leaf with maximum N, P and K content were observed under sand: vermicompost (2:1) + Azotobacter in comparison to the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand: vermicompost (2:1) plus Azotobacter produced minimum strawberry acidity versus other treatments.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
sand: vermicompost (2:1) + Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
acidity contente0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum acidity content and leaf with maximum N, P and K content were observed under sand: vermicompost (2:1) + Azotobacter in comparison to the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand: vermicompost (2:1) plus Azotobacter produced maximum leaf N, P and K content versus other treatments.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
sand: vermicompost (2:1) + Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
N, P and K contente0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf with maximum N, P and K content were observed under sand: vermicompost (2:1) + Azotobacter in comparison to the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

growing medium · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 74 positive, 9 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

growing medium · nutrient: content · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.