Paper · 2006 · Horticultural Science and Technology

Effect of Double Layered Substrate on the Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Strawberry in Elevated Hydroponic System

Ha Joon Jun; Jeong‐In Hwang; I.G. Kim; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment has investigated the effects of growth, yield, and fruit quality of strawberries by two different kinds of growth substrate layers. The experiment was performed with strawberry cultivar ‘Akihime’ in greenhouse in Daegu University. Perlite, cocopeat, cocopeat/perlite (upper layer/lower layer), vermiculite/perlite and the mixture of vermiculite and rice hull were used for solid substrate. Nutrient solution for strawberries, which made by Yamazaki, was supplied in proper concentration by its growth stage. Early stages of strawberry growth were the best at the cocopeat substrate in terms of number of leaves, leaf length, and leaf width. The soluble solids and fruit length of the strawberries did not differ from the different kind of substrates. However, the weight and diameter of strawberries did have the best outcomes from the cocopeat substrate and the cocopeat/perlite two layer substrates. The number of strawberries was the best at the cocopeat/perlite substrates due to the high capacity of moisture holding at the upper layer and the good air permeability of the lower layer, which derived good nourishment from the well developed roots. The results of this experiment will be utilized in the new substrate application for strawberry hydroponics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat gave the best early leaf number, length and width.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
cocopeat substratee0
Outcome
number of leaves, leaf length, and leaf widthe0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early stages of strawberry growth were the best at the cocopeat substrate in terms of number of leaves, leaf length, and leaf width.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrates did not differ in strawberry soluble solids or fruit length.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
different kind of substratese0
Outcome
soluble solids and fruit lengthe0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble solids and fruit length of the strawberries did not differ from the different kind of substrates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat gave the best strawberry fruit weight and diameter.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
cocopeat substratee0
Outcome
weight and diametere0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weight and diameter of strawberries did have the best outcomes from the cocopeat substrate and the cocopeat/perlite two layer substrates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat/perlite two-layer substrate gave the best strawberry fruit weight and diameter.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
cocopeat/perlite two layer substratese0
Outcome
weight and diametere0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weight and diameter of strawberries did have the best outcomes from the cocopeat substrate and the cocopeat/perlite two layer substrates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocopeat/perlite gave the highest number of strawberries.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
cocopeat/perlite substratese0
Outcome
number of strawberriese0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of strawberries was the best at the cocopeat/perlite substrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–992 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed fruit number on cocopeat/perlite to water holding, air permeability and root nourishment.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
good nourishmente0
Qualifier
high capacity of moisture holding at the upper layer and the good air permeability of the lower layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“due to the high capacity of moisture holding at the upper layer and the good air permeability of the lower layer, which derived good nourishment from the well developed roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑

growing medium · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

growing medium · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 45 positive, 10 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.