Paper · 1990 · Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics)

Management of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpea Through Integration of Host Plant Tolerance and Foliar Spraying of Chlorothalonil

M. V. Reddy; Karam B. Singh

4
claims
13
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted for three seasons (1982/83, 1983/84, and 1985/86) at Tel Hadya, Syria, to evaluate effect of foliar spraying of chlorothalonil (Bravo 500) on Ascochyta blight severity and yield in a blight tolerant Kabuli chickpea cultivar ILC 482. One spray during the vegetative stage (VS) significantly reduced blight severity on leaves and stems in some seasons as compared to nonsprayed plots. Two sprays, one each during the VS and reproductive stage (RS) or both in RS signifi-cantly reduced blight severity on leaves, stems and pods and also increased yield in some seasons. Two sprays of chlorothalonil, one each during the seedling and early podding stages on an average of two seasons gave the highest cost-benefit ratio of 1:5 for controlling Ascochyta blight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One spray during the vegetative stage significantly reduced Ascochyta blight severity on leaves and stems in some seasons compared with nonsprayed plots.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
ILC 482e0
Treatment
One spray during the vegetative stage (VS)e2
Interactor
Ascochyta Blightt0pathogen
Outcome
blight severity on leaves and stemse2
Direction
reducede2
Qualifier
in some seasonse2
Comparator
nonsprayed plotse2
Setting
Tel Hadya, Syriae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ascochyta Blight of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“in a blight tolerant Kabuli chickpea cultivar ILC 482”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–259 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Tel Hadya, Syria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“One spray during the vegetative stage (VS) significantly reduced blight severity on leaves and stems in some seasons as compared to nonsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays, during the vegetative and reproductive stages, significantly reduced Ascochyta blight severity on leaves, stems and pods.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Two sprays, one each during the VS and reproductive stage (RS) or both in RSe1
Interactor
Ascochyta Blightt0pathogen
Outcome
blight severity on leaves, stems and podse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ascochyta Blight of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“in a blight tolerant Kabuli chickpea cultivar ILC 482”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–259 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two sprays, one each during the VS and reproductive stage (RS) or both in RS signifi-cantly reduced blight severity on leaves, stems and pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays, during the vegetative and reproductive stages, also increased chickpea yield in some seasons.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Two sprays, one each during the VS and reproductive stage (RS) or both in RSe1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
in some seasonse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ascochyta Blight of Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“in a blight tolerant Kabuli chickpea cultivar ILC 482”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–259 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two sprays, one each during the VS and reproductive stage (RS) or both in RS signifi-cantly reduced blight severity on leaves, stems and pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–552 · show in text ↑
e2

“and also increased yield in some seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of chlorothalonil at the seedling and early podding stages gave the highest cost-benefit ratio, 1:5, for controlling Ascochyta blight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Two sprays of chlorothalonil, one each during the seedling and early podding stagese1
Interactor
Ascochyta blighte1pathogen
Outcome
cost-benefit ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1:5e1
Qualifier
on an average of two seasonse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in a blight tolerant Kabuli chickpea cultivar ILC 482”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–259 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two sprays of chlorothalonil, one each during the seedling and early podding stages on an average of two seasons gave the highest cost-benefit ratio of 1:5 for controlling Ascochyta blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–783 · show in text ↑

chlorothalonil · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.