Abstract
On-farm trials (OFT) were carried out on farmers’ fields in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh during 2005–06 and 2006–07 with a view to assess the production potentials and economic feasibility of improved sugarcane based cropping system under real farming situations. In general, sugarcane based inter-cropping system was found more productive and remunerative than the system of sole cane cropping being adopted by the farmers in general in the region. Results of OFT indicated that inter-crops viz. mustard, toria and coriander in autumn sugarcane and green gram and black gram in spring sugarcane gave considerably higher net returns over sole cropping of autumn and spring seasons cane. The inter-cropping of mustard, toria, coriander, green gram and black gram with sugarcane exhibited benefit: cost ratio of 1.35, 1.42, 1.53, 1.27 and 1.17, respectively as against 1.06, and 1.04 under the autumn sole cane and spring sole cane, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane-based intercropping was more productive and remunerative than sole cane cropping
Verbatim
e1“sugarcane based inter-cropping system was found more productive and remunerative than the system of sole cane cropping”
e0“On-farm trials (OFT) were carried out on farmers’ fields in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh during 2005–06 and 2006–07”
Claim · model-written summary
Mustard, toria and coriander intercropped in autumn sugarcane gave considerably higher net returns than autumn sole cane
Verbatim
e2“inter-crops viz. mustard, toria and coriander in autumn sugarcane and green gram and black gram in spring sugarcane gave considerably higher net returns over sole cropping of autumn and spring seasons cane”
e0“On-farm trials (OFT) were carried out on farmers’ fields in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh during 2005–06 and 2006–07”
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram and black gram intercropped in spring sugarcane gave considerably higher net returns than spring sole cane
Verbatim
e2“inter-crops viz. mustard, toria and coriander in autumn sugarcane and green gram and black gram in spring sugarcane gave considerably higher net returns over sole cropping of autumn and spring seasons cane”
e0“On-farm trials (OFT) were carried out on farmers’ fields in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh during 2005–06 and 2006–07”
Claim · model-written summary
Mustard intercropping in sugarcane had a benefit:cost ratio of 1.35, against 1.06 for autumn sole cane
Verbatim
e3“The inter-cropping of mustard, toria, coriander, green gram and black gram with sugarcane exhibited benefit: cost ratio of 1.35, 1.42, 1.53, 1.27 and 1.17, respectively as against 1.06, and 1.04 under the autumn sole cane and spring sole cane, respectively”
e0“On-farm trials (OFT) were carried out on farmers’ fields in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh during 2005–06 and 2006–07”
Claim · model-written summary
Toria intercropping in sugarcane had a benefit:cost ratio of 1.42, against 1.06 for autumn sole cane
Verbatim
e3“The inter-cropping of mustard, toria, coriander, green gram and black gram with sugarcane exhibited benefit: cost ratio of 1.35, 1.42, 1.53, 1.27 and 1.17, respectively as against 1.06, and 1.04 under the autumn sole cane and spring sole cane, respectively”
e0“On-farm trials (OFT) were carried out on farmers’ fields in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh during 2005–06 and 2006–07”
Claim · model-written summary
Coriander intercropping in sugarcane had a benefit:cost ratio of 1.53, against 1.06 for autumn sole cane
Verbatim
e3“The inter-cropping of mustard, toria, coriander, green gram and black gram with sugarcane exhibited benefit: cost ratio of 1.35, 1.42, 1.53, 1.27 and 1.17, respectively as against 1.06, and 1.04 under the autumn sole cane and spring sole cane, respectively”
e0“On-farm trials (OFT) were carried out on farmers’ fields in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh during 2005–06 and 2006–07”
Claim · model-written summary
Green gram intercropping in sugarcane had a benefit:cost ratio of 1.27, against 1.04 for spring sole cane
Verbatim
e3“The inter-cropping of mustard, toria, coriander, green gram and black gram with sugarcane exhibited benefit: cost ratio of 1.35, 1.42, 1.53, 1.27 and 1.17, respectively as against 1.06, and 1.04 under the autumn sole cane and spring sole cane, respectively”
e0“On-farm trials (OFT) were carried out on farmers’ fields in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh during 2005–06 and 2006–07”
Claim · model-written summary
Black gram intercropping in sugarcane had a benefit:cost ratio of 1.17, against 1.04 for spring sole cane
Verbatim
e3“The inter-cropping of mustard, toria, coriander, green gram and black gram with sugarcane exhibited benefit: cost ratio of 1.35, 1.42, 1.53, 1.27 and 1.17, respectively as against 1.06, and 1.04 under the autumn sole cane and spring sole cane, respectively”
e0“On-farm trials (OFT) were carried out on farmers’ fields in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh during 2005–06 and 2006–07”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna mungo · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Coriandrum sativum · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.