Paper · 2011

Effect of Plant Geometry and Planting Methods on the Incidence of Shoot Borer Chilo Infuscatellus (Snellen) and Yield Parameters in Sugarcane

A. Thirumurugan; S. Sundravadana; T Ragavan; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at Sugarcane Research Station, Melalathur, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University during 2005-2008 in Randomized Block Design with three replications to study the effect of plant geometry and planting methods on the incidence of shoot borer Chilo infuscatellus and yield parameter in late planted sugarcane crop during summer months using COG 94077. The single bud seedlings were raised in bed and polybags on the same day of conventional two budded sett planted in the field. The seedlings were transplanted in the main field on 30 days after shoot borer observation taken. The intercrops were sown 3 rd day after planting / transplanting and in situ incorporated on 90 th day at the time of earthing up. The shoot borer incidences were recorded on 30 th , 60 th and 90 th days on the basis of number of shoot affected with respect to total number of shoots and cumulative shoot borer incidence was worked out. Conventional two budded sett planted on one side of ridges + black gram on the other side, recorded the lowest cumulative shoot borer incidence of 21.32 per cent. The raised bed seedlings were more susceptible to shoot borer (31.5%) than polybag seedling (22.74%) and conventional two budded planting (22.44%). Sugarcane intercropped with blackgram reduced the shoot borer incidence in all the treatments due to changes in the micro climate developed by the intercrops and non host crops acted as physical barrier. The highest sugar yield of 14.81 t/ha was obtained from cane yield of 107.25 t/ha with CCS% of 13.81 in conventional two budded setts planted on one side of the ridges+ blackgram on the other side.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional two budded sett planting with black gram had the lowest cumulative shoot borer incidence, 21.32 per cent.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Conventional two budded sett planted on one side of ridges + black gram on the other sidee0
Interactor
Chilo infuscatellusChilo infuscatelluse2pest
Outcome
cumulative shoot borer incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
21.32 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional two budded sett planted on one side of ridges + black gram on the other side, recorded the lowest cumulative shoot borer incidence of 21.32 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1100 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“shoot borer Chilo infuscatellus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed seedlings had higher shoot borer incidence, 31.5%, than polybag seedlings at 22.74%.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
raised bed seedlingse0
Interactor
Chilo infuscatellusChilo infuscatelluse2pest
Outcome
susceptible to shoot borere0
Direction
more susceptiblee0
Value
31.5%e0
Qualifier
22.74%e0
Comparator
polybag seedlinge0

Verbatim

e0

“raised bed seedlings were more susceptible to shoot borer (31.5%) than polybag seedling (22.74%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1202 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“shoot borer Chilo infuscatellus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed seedlings had higher shoot borer incidence than conventional two budded planting at 22.44%.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
raised bed seedlingse0
Interactor
Chilo infuscatellusChilo infuscatelluse2pest
Outcome
susceptible to shoot borere0
Direction
more susceptiblee0
Value
31.5%e0
Qualifier
22.44%e0
Comparator
conventional two budded plantinge0

Verbatim

e0

“raised bed seedlings were more susceptible to shoot borer (31.5%) than polybag seedling (22.74%) and conventional two budded planting (22.44%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1248 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“shoot borer Chilo infuscatellus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blackgram intercropping reduced sugarcane shoot borer incidence across treatments.

Taxon
Sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropped with blackgrame0
Interactor
Chilo infuscatellusChilo infuscatelluse1pest
Second interactor
blackgramVigna mungoe0other
Outcome
shoot borer incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · Second interactorSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarcane intercropped with blackgram reduced the shoot borer incidence in all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1343 · show in text ↑
e1

“shoot borer Chilo infuscatellus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–287 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrops were interpreted as changing microclimate and acting as a physical barrier to shoot borer.

Taxon
Sugarcanee1
Treatment
intercropped with blackgrame1
Outcome
shoot borer incidencee1
Qualifier
non host crops acted as physical barriere0

Verbatim

e0

“due to changes in the micro climate developed by the intercrops and non host crops acted as physical barrier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1452 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugarcane intercropped with blackgram reduced the shoot borer incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The conventional sett and blackgram configuration yielded the highest sugar yield of 14.81 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
conventional two budded setts planted on one side of the ridges+ blackgram on the other sidee0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.81 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest sugar yield of 14.81 t/ha was obtained from cane yield of 107.25 t/ha with CCS% of 13.81 in conventional two budded setts planted on one side of the ridges+ blackgram on the other side”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1650 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest sugar yield treatment produced cane yield of 107.25 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
conventional two budded setts planted on one side of the ridges+ blackgram on the other sidee0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Value
107.25 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“cane yield of 107.25 t/ha with CCS% of 13.81 in conventional two budded setts planted on one side of the ridges+ blackgram on the other side”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1650 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest sugar yield treatment had CCS of 13.81%.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
conventional two budded setts planted on one side of the ridges+ blackgram on the other sidee0
Outcome
CCS%e0
Value
13.81e0

Verbatim

e0

“CCS% of 13.81 in conventional two budded setts planted on one side of the ridges+ blackgram on the other side”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1650 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–338 · show in text ↑

Vigna mungo · Chilo infuscatellus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · Chilo infuscatellus · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.