Paper · 2012 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Crop establishment, tillage and weed management techniques on weed dynamics and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cropping system

J S MISHRA; V P SINGH; CHANDRA BHANU; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field study was conducted to study the effect of methods of rice establishment, tillage and weed management techniques in rice–chickpea cropping system. Treatments included four crop establishment techniques (transplanting, puddling and broadcasting sprouted rice seeds, i.e wet-seeding and dry seeding under conventional and zero tillage systems) in rice and two tillage (zero and conventional) and two weed control methods (weedy check and pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha as pre-emergence + one hand weeding at 30 days after sowing) in succeeding chickpea. Rice field was infested with jungle rice [Echinochloa colona (L.) Link], Caesulia (Caesulia axillaris Roxb.), sessile joyweed [Alternanthera sessilis (L.) DC.], and rice flat sedge (Cyperus iria L.) and chickpea with wild oats (Avena ludoviciana Dur.) and toothed burclover (Medicago hispida Gaertn.). Results revealed that methods of rice establishment did influence the weed dynamics in rice– chickpea system. Mean yield of zero-till direct-seeded rice (3 262 kg/ha) was as good as that of puddle broadcast rice (3 343 kg/ha) and better than the transplanted rice (3 038 kg/ha). Effective weed control in preceding chickpea benefitted the succeeding rice crop. Methods of rice establishment and tillage did not influence the chickpea yield. Infestation of weeds caused 78.45% reduction in yield of chickpea. Maximum seed yield of chickpea (2 813 kg/ha) was noticed in pendimethalin followed by one HW under conventional tillage. Zero till direct-seeded rice followed by zero-till chickpea system was the best combination for maximizing system productivity, profitability and energy efficiency

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice establishment methods influenced weed dynamics in the rice–chickpea system.

Treatment
methods of rice establishmente0
Outcome
weed dynamicse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods of rice establishment did influence the weed dynamics in rice– chickpea system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till direct-seeded rice yield was 3 262 kg/ha, comparable to puddle broadcast rice.

Treatment
zero-till direct-seeded ricee0
Outcome
Mean yielde0
Direction
as good ase0
Value
3 262 kg/hae0
Qualifier
3 343 kg/hae0
Comparator
puddle broadcast ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean yield of zero-till direct-seeded rice (3 262 kg/ha) was as good as that of puddle broadcast rice (3 343 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till direct-seeded rice yielded more than transplanted rice.

Treatment
zero-till direct-seeded ricee0
Outcome
ricee0
Direction
better thane0
Value
3 262 kg/hae0
Qualifier
3 038 kg/hae0
Comparator
transplanted ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero-till direct-seeded rice (3 262 kg/ha) was as good as that of puddle broadcast rice (3 343 kg/ha) and better than the transplanted rice (3 038 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective weed control in preceding chickpea benefited succeeding rice.

Treatment
Effective weed control in preceding chickpeae0
Outcome
succeeding rice crope0
Direction
benefittede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effective weed control in preceding chickpea benefitted the succeeding rice crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice establishment and tillage methods did not influence chickpea yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Methods of rice establishment and tillagee0
Outcome
chickpea yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Methods of rice establishment and tillage did not influence the chickpea yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation reduced chickpea yield by 78.45%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Infestation of weedse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
yield of chickpeae0
Direction
reductione0
Value
78.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infestation of weeds caused 78.45% reduction in yield of chickpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus one hand weeding under conventional tillage gave maximum chickpea seed yield of 2 813 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
pendimethalin followed by one HW under conventional tillagee0
Outcome
seed yield of chickpeae0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
2 813 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum seed yield of chickpea (2 813 kg/ha) was noticed in pendimethalin followed by one HW under conventional tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till direct-seeded rice followed by zero-till chickpea was the best combination for system productivity, profitability and energy efficiency.

Treatment
Zero till direct-seeded rice followed by zero-till chickpea systeme0
Outcome
system productivity, profitability and energy efficiencye0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zero till direct-seeded rice followed by zero-till chickpea system was the best combination for maximizing system productivity, profitability and energy efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–142 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

infection · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

herbicide · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

tillage · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

transplanting · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 32 positive, 3 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 587 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.