Paper · 1995 · Agricultural and Food Science

Effect of seed dressing treatment of Streptomyces griseoviridis on barley and spring wheat in field experiments

Risto Tahvonen; Asko Hannukkala; Hanna Avikainen

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of seed dressing with the antagonist Streptomyces griseoviridis on root rots and yields of wheat and barley was studied in field experiments. In long-term field experiments, where different levels of soil-borne inoculum of root rots were maintained with different crop sequences, seed treatment with the antagonist increased yields slightly on average over all experimental years. However, variations between years, crops and crop sequences were considerable. The highest yield increases were in excess of 600 kg/ha, whilst treatment occasionally resulted in slight yield losses. In experiments in which seed naturally infested with Fusarium spp. was used, seed treatment with S. griseoviridis increased yields of wheat but not those of barley. Seed dressing with an organomercurial fungicide resulted in higher yield increases than the biopreparate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonist seed treatment slightly increased average yields across years, with substantial variation.

Treatment
seed treatment with the antagoniste0
Interactor
Streptomyces griseoviridisStreptomyces griseoviridise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
variations between years, crops and crop sequences were considerablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with the antagonist increased yields slightly on average over all experimental years. However, variations between years, crops and crop sequences were considerable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–469 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of seed dressing with the antagonist Streptomyces griseoviridis on root rots and yields of wheat and barley was studied in field experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield gains exceeded 600 kg/ha.

Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
in excess of 600 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield increases were in excess of 600 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–526 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of seed dressing with the antagonist Streptomyces griseoviridis on root rots and yields of wheat and barley was studied in field experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment occasionally caused slight yield losses.

Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment occasionally resulted in slight yield losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–589 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of seed dressing with the antagonist Streptomyces griseoviridis on root rots and yields of wheat and barley was studied in field experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With Fusarium infested seed, S. griseoviridis increased wheat yields.

Treatment
seed treatment with S. griseoviridise0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
S. griseoviridisStreptomyces griseoviridise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yields of wheate0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed naturally infested with Fusarium spp. was used, seed treatment with S. griseoviridis increased yields of wheat but not those of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of seed dressing with the antagonist Streptomyces griseoviridis on root rots and yields of wheat and barley was studied in field experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With Fusarium infested seed, S. griseoviridis did not increase barley yields.

Treatment
seed treatment with S. griseoviridise0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
S. griseoviridisStreptomyces griseoviridise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed naturally infested with Fusarium spp. was used, seed treatment with S. griseoviridis increased yields of wheat but not those of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of seed dressing with the antagonist Streptomyces griseoviridis on root rots and yields of wheat and barley was studied in field experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organomercurial fungicide produced higher yield increases than the biopreparate.

Taxon
barley and spring wheatHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Seed dressing with an organomercurial fungicidee0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
biopreparatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed dressing with an organomercurial fungicide resulted in higher yield increases than the biopreparate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–860 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of seed dressing with the antagonist Streptomyces griseoviridis on root rots and yields of wheat and barley was studied in field experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley and spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–90 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

seed treatment · Fusarium · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.