Paper · 1988 · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)

Effects of air pollutants on photosynthesis, vegetative growth, and development of grapevines in the San Joaquin Valley of California. Final report, February 1987-February 1989

L.E. Williams; Teryl R. Roper; R.F. Brewer

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Mature Thompson Seedless grapevines were exposed to charcoal-filtered air or ambient ozone in open-top field chambers near Fresno, CA. Chronic exposure to ambient ozone reduced net carbon dioxide assimilation rates an average of 9% through the season when compared to the filtered-air treatment. The initial slope of a carboxylation efficiency curve was less for the ambient ozone treatment compared to the filtered-air treatment. Individual leaves were exposed to ozone concentrations of 200, 400, or 600 ppb for 5 to 10 hours. No visual ozone damage was found. Exposure of leaves to 200 ppb ozone for 5 hours had no effect on photosynthesis. Photosynthesis was reduced approximately 50 to 80% respectively after 5 hours of exposure to 400 and 600 ppb ozone compared to the controls. There were no significant differences in vine-growth parameters, bud fruitfulness or yield between vines exposed to either filtered or ambient air. Net carbon dioxide assimilation rates for five of six potted grape cultivars exposed to 1.5 times ambient ozone concentrations were substantially less than for those grown in the charcoal-filtered air. The cultivar 'Barbera' had greater rates of photosynthesis at the higher ozone concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chronic exposure to ambient ozone reduced net carbon dioxide assimilation rates of Thompson Seedless grapevines by an average of 9% through the season relative to filtered air in open-top field chambers near Fresno, CA.

Taxon
Thompson Seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
ambient ozonee1
Outcome
net carbon dioxide assimilation ratese1
Direction
reducede1
Value
9%e1
Comparator
filtered-air treatmente1
Setting
open-top field chambers near Fresno, CAe0

Verbatim

e0

“Mature Thompson Seedless grapevines were exposed to charcoal-filtered air or ambient ozone in open-top field chambers near Fresno, CA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chronic exposure to ambient ozone reduced net carbon dioxide assimilation rates an average of 9% through the season when compared to the filtered-air treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initial slope of the carboxylation efficiency curve of grapevines was lower under ambient ozone than under filtered air.

Taxon
Thompson Seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
ambient ozonee1
Outcome
initial slope of a carboxylation efficiency curvee1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
filtered-air treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“Mature Thompson Seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“The initial slope of a carboxylation efficiency curve was less for the ambient ozone treatment compared to the filtered-air treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis of individual grapevine leaves was reduced by approximately 50 to 80% after 5 hours of exposure to 400 and 600 ppb ozone respectively, compared with controls.

Taxon
Thompson Seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
5 hours of exposure to 400 and 600 ppb ozonee1
Outcome
Photosynthesise1
Direction
reducede1
Value
approximately 50 to 80%e1
Comparator
the controlse1

Verbatim

e0

“Mature Thompson Seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“Photosynthesis was reduced approximately 50 to 80% respectively after 5 hours of exposure to 400 and 600 ppb ozone compared to the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure of leaves to 200 ppb ozone for 5 hours had no effect on photosynthesis.

Taxon
Thompson Seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
200 ppb ozone for 5 hourse1
Outcome
photosynthesise1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mature Thompson Seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“Exposure of leaves to 200 ppb ozone for 5 hours had no effect on photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–642 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No visual ozone damage was found on the exposed grapevine leaves.

Taxon
Thompson Seedless grapevinese0
Outcome
visual ozone damagee1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Mature Thompson Seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“No visual ozone damage was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no significant differences in vine-growth parameters, bud fruitfulness or yield between grapevines exposed to filtered or ambient air.

Taxon
Thompson Seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
ambient aire1
Outcome
vine-growth parameters, bud fruitfulness or yielde1
Direction
no significant differencese1
Comparator
filterede1

Verbatim

e0

“Mature Thompson Seedless grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were no significant differences in vine-growth parameters, bud fruitfulness or yield between vines exposed to either filtered or ambient air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net carbon dioxide assimilation rates of five of six potted grape cultivars exposed to 1.5 times ambient ozone were substantially lower than those grown in charcoal-filtered air.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
five of six potted grape cultivarse0
Treatment
1.5 times ambient ozone concentrationse0
Outcome
Net carbon dioxide assimilation ratese0
Direction
substantially lesse0
Comparator
charcoal-filtered aire0

Verbatim

e0

“Net carbon dioxide assimilation rates for five of six potted grape cultivars exposed to 1.5 times ambient ozone concentrations were substantially less than for those grown in the charcoal-filtered air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grape cultivar 'Barbera' had greater rates of photosynthesis at the higher ozone concentration.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
'Barbera'e1
Treatment
higher ozone concentratione1
Outcome
rates of photosynthesise1
Direction
greatere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“potted grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cultivar 'Barbera' had greater rates of photosynthesis at the higher ozone concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1227 · show in text ↑

ozone · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

ozone · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.