Abstract
Field experiments were conducted during summer and rabi 1995 on CO 26 sorghum at Agricultrual College and Research Institute, Killikulam to find out the effect of intercropping systems and weed control methods on yield and nutrient uptake of sorghum and weeds. The results revealed that sole sorghum recorded higher nutrient uptake than sorghum in intercropping system. Metolachlor @ 1.0 kg. ha+one hoeing on 40 DAS caused lowest uptake of nutrients by weeds and highest yields and uptake of nutrients by sorghum. Intercropping system of sorghum + blackgram recorded higher sorghum grain yield than sorghum cowpea intercropping system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Sole sorghum had higher nutrient uptake than sorghum in an intercropping system.
- Material
- CO 26e0
- Treatment
- intercropping systeme1
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- sole sorghume1
- Setting
- Field experimentse0
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted during summer and rabi 1995 on CO 26 sorghum”
e1“sole sorghum recorded higher nutrient uptake than sorghum in intercropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Metolachlor at 1.0 kg/ha plus one hoeing at 40 DAS gave the lowest nutrient uptake by weeds.
- Treatment
- Metolachlor @ 1.0 kg. ha+one hoeing on 40 DASe2
- Interactor
- weedse2weed
- Outcome
- uptake of nutrients by weedse2
- Direction
- loweste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted during summer and rabi 1995 on CO 26 sorghum”
e2“Metolachlor @ 1.0 kg. ha+one hoeing on 40 DAS caused lowest uptake of nutrients by weeds and highest yields and uptake of nutrients by sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Metolachlor at 1.0 kg/ha plus one hoeing at 40 DAS gave the highest sorghum yields and nutrient uptake.
- Treatment
- Metolachlor @ 1.0 kg. ha+one hoeing on 40 DASe2
- Outcome
- yields and uptake of nutrients by sorghume2
- Direction
- higheste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted during summer and rabi 1995 on CO 26 sorghum”
e2“Metolachlor @ 1.0 kg. ha+one hoeing on 40 DAS caused lowest uptake of nutrients by weeds and highest yields and uptake of nutrients by sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum + blackgram intercropping gave higher sorghum grain yield than sorghum + cowpea intercropping.
- Treatment
- Intercropping system of sorghum + blackgrame3
- Outcome
- sorghum grain yielde3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- sorghum cowpea intercropping systeme3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted during summer and rabi 1995 on CO 26 sorghum”
e3“Intercropping system of sorghum + blackgram recorded higher sorghum grain yield than sorghum cowpea intercropping system”
The same questions in other papers
metolachlor · yield · SorghumResults differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Vigna mungo · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →metolachlor · weed · SorghumResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →intercropping · yield · SorghumResults differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
161 papers more in this group
See all 165 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.