Paper · 1988 · Weed Science

Acetanilide Activity and Dissipation as Influenced by Formulation and Wheat Stubble

B. B. Petersen; P. J. Shea; G. A. Wicks

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Laboratory and field research was conducted to determine the influence of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) stubble on weed control and the dissipation of emulsifiable concentrate formulations (EC) of metolachlor [2-chloro- N -(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)- N -(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl) acetamide], alachlor [2-chloro- N -(2,6-diethylphenyl)- N -(methoxymethyl)acetamide], and acetochlor [2-chloro- N -(ethoxymethyl)- N -(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)acetamide]; and microencapsulated formulations (ME) of alachlor and acetochlor. EC metolachlor provided better weed control than EC alachlor when applied 28 days before planting sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L.) and similar weed control when applied at 1 or 14 days before planting. This difference was attributed to more rapid EC alachlor dissipation. The order of relative herbicide persistence at 24 C and 33% (w/w) soil moisture in a silty clay loam was ME acetochlor = ME alachlor > EC metolachlor > EC acetochlor = EC alachlor. Acetanilide degradation was affected more by increasing temperature from 15 to 24 C than by increasing soil moisture from 15 to 33%. More herbicide was washed from overwintered than fresh straw in the first 1 cm of simulated rainfall. In the first simulated rainfall event, more herbicide was removed from straw that had been dry than wet at application, but the amount of herbicide remaining on dry and wet straw was similar after four events. Formulation generally did not affect herbicide wash-off.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC metolachlor gave better weed control in sorghum than EC alachlor when applied 28 days before planting.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
EC metolachlore1
Outcome
weed controle1
Direction
bettere1
Qualifier
28 days before plantinge1
Comparator
EC alachlore1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“EC metolachlor provided better weed control than EC alachlor when applied 28 days before planting sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L.) and similar weed control when applied at 1 or 14 days before planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC metolachlor gave similar weed control to EC alachlor when applied 1 or 14 days before sorghum planting.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
EC metolachlore1
Outcome
weed controle1
Direction
similare1
Qualifier
when applied at 1 or 14 days before plantinge1
Comparator
EC alachlore1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“EC metolachlor provided better weed control than EC alachlor when applied 28 days before planting sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L.) and similar weed control when applied at 1 or 14 days before planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–720 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed control difference between EC metolachlor and EC alachlor is attributed to more rapid EC alachlor dissipation.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Outcome
weed controle1
Qualifier
more rapid EC alachlor dissipatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“EC metolachlor provided better weed control than EC alachlor when applied 28 days before planting sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L.) and similar weed control when applied at 1 or 14 days before planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–720 · show in text ↑
e2

“This difference was attributed to more rapid EC alachlor dissipation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative herbicide persistence in a silty clay loam at 24 C and 33% soil moisture ranked the acetanilide formulations.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
relative herbicide persistencee3
Setting
silty clay loame3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“influence of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) stubble on weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“The order of relative herbicide persistence at 24 C and 33% (w/w) soil moisture in a silty clay loam was ME acetochlor = ME alachlor > EC metolachlor > EC acetochlor = EC alachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing temperature from 15 to 24 C affected acetanilide degradation more than increasing soil moisture from 15 to 33%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
increasing temperature from 15 to 24 Ce4
Outcome
Acetanilide degradatione4
Direction
affected moree4
Comparator
increasing soil moisture from 15 to 33%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“influence of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) stubble on weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–134 · show in text ↑
e4

“Acetanilide degradation was affected more by increasing temperature from 15 to 24 C than by increasing soil moisture from 15 to 33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More herbicide was washed from overwintered wheat straw than from fresh straw in the first 1 cm of simulated rainfall.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
overwinterede5
Outcome
herbicide was washede5
Direction
Moree5
Comparator
fresh strawe5
Setting
first 1 cm of simulated rainfalle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“influence of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) stubble on weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–134 · show in text ↑
e5

“More herbicide was washed from overwintered than fresh straw in the first 1 cm of simulated rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More herbicide was removed from dry than from wet straw in the first simulated rainfall event.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
drye6
Outcome
herbicide was removede6
Direction
moree6
Qualifier
first simulated rainfall evente6
Comparator
wete6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“influence of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) stubble on weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–134 · show in text ↑
e6

“In the first simulated rainfall event, more herbicide was removed from straw that had been dry than wet at application, but the amount of herbicide remaining on dry and wet straw was similar after four events”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amount of herbicide remaining on dry and wet straw was similar after four rainfall events.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
dry and wet strawe6
Outcome
amount of herbicide remaininge6
Direction
was similare6
Qualifier
after four eventse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“influence of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) stubble on weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–134 · show in text ↑
e6

“In the first simulated rainfall event, more herbicide was removed from straw that had been dry than wet at application, but the amount of herbicide remaining on dry and wet straw was similar after four events”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formulation generally did not affect acetanilide herbicide wash-off from wheat straw.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Formulatione7
Outcome
herbicide wash-offe7
Direction
did not affecte7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“influence of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) stubble on weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–134 · show in text ↑
e7

“Formulation generally did not affect herbicide wash-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1473 · show in text ↑

metolachlor · weed · SorghumResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.