Paper · 2020 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Mitigating the effect of salinity stress through integrated application of ACC-deaminase containing rihizobacteria and biogas slurry to improve the productivity of wheat crop

Zafar-Ul-Hye, Muhammad; Yaseen, Rizwan; Akbar, Muhammad Naeem; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Soil salinity is a devastating environmental stress for sustainable agriculture around the globe. To rescue plant growth, ACC deaminase containing PGPR provide the great potential against salinity stress in dry lands. Biogas slurry is an important contribution to soil fertility and better crop yields. For this, wheat seeds were inoculated with Alcaligenes faecalis, Bacillus cereus and Lysinibacillus fusiformis; and biogas slurry was applied at different salinity levels (4, 6 and 9 dS m-1 EC) in soil. The 9 dS m-1 salinity stress level adversely reduced the plant growth which reflects the NaCl toxicity. Rhizobacterial inoculation improved the shoot and root length up to 40 and 34 % with their respective control. When the wheat plants were exposed to salinity stress, the sodium (Na+) ions accumulation was significantly reduced in ACC-deaminase containing PGPRs-treated plants with respect to control, suggesting that the high level of tolerance to negative influences of Na+ ions concentration. Hence, biogas slurry with the PGPR strain Lysinibacillus fusiformis was the most effective combination for improving growth and yield of wheat under saline condition. In conclusion, combined use of biogas slurry and PGPR in agricultural is a sustainable strategy for the alleviation of salinity stress in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

9 dS m-1 salinity reduced plant growth.

Treatment
9 dS m-1 salinity stress levele0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–174 · show in text ↑
e0

“The 9 dS m-1 salinity stress level adversely reduced the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial inoculation increased shoot length up to 40%.

Treatment
Rhizobacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
improvede0
Value
40e0
Comparator
respective controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–174 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobacterial inoculation improved the shoot and root length up to 40 and 34 % with their respective control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial inoculation increased root length up to 34%.

Treatment
Rhizobacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
34 %e0
Comparator
respective controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–174 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rhizobacterial inoculation improved the shoot and root length up to 40 and 34 % with their respective control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR treatment significantly reduced sodium accumulation during salinity stress.

Treatment
ACC-deaminase containing PGPRs-treated plantse0
Outcome
sodium (Na+) ions accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–174 · show in text ↑
e0

“the sodium (Na+) ions accumulation was significantly reduced in ACC-deaminase containing PGPRs-treated plants with respect to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slurry plus Lysinibacillus fusiformis best improved wheat growth and yield under salinity.

Treatment
biogas slurry with the PGPR strain Lysinibacillus fusiformise0
Interactor
Lysinibacillus fusiformisLysinibacillus fusiformise0symbiont
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–174 · show in text ↑
e0

“biogas slurry with the PGPR strain Lysinibacillus fusiformis was the most effective combination for improving growth and yield of wheat under saline condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1171 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors propose slurry and PGPR as a salinity alleviation strategy for wheat.

Outcome
combined use of biogas slurry and PGPR in agriculturale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 164–174 · show in text ↑
e0

“combined use of biogas slurry and PGPR in agricultural is a sustainable strategy for the alleviation of salinity stress in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1316 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.