Paper · 2021 · Rhizosphere

The bioprotective effect of root endophytic Serendipita herbamans against Fusarium wilt in tomato and its impact on root traits are determined by temperature

Negar Ghezel Sefloo; Siegrid Steinkellner; Karin Hage-Ahmed

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Environmental conditions such as temperature can be important determinants for the success of biocontrol agents in field situations. On the one hand temperature affects biocontrol strains on the other plant–pathogen dynamics. In order to understand these dynamics, driving factors behind these interactions need to be fully characterized. Here, we i) investigated the effect of two temperature treatments on the biocontrol activity of the root endophyte Serendipita herbamans against the soil-borne pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) in tomato and ii) assessed the impact of this biocontrol system on root morphological traits. The results of this study indicate that inoculation with S. herbamans stimulated shoot length and enhanced the shoot and root dry mass in tomato plants across both temperatures. Furthermore, S. herbamans inoculation decreased disease incidence from 67% in the Fol only treatment to 22% at lower temperatures (24 °C). At 28 °C, disease incidence was around 41% and no reduction could be seen; however, root morphological traits such as root length, root surface area and root volume were not affected at 24 °C but severely reduced under 28 °C upon Fol inoculation. A reduction of root morphological parameters was not observed in S. herbamans + Fol treated plants at 28 °C indicating a protective effect against Fol. Moreover, root morphological traits appear to be more influenced by the different temperatures than root dry weights. In additional in-vitro experiments, growth promoting effects of S. herbamans on root traits without direct contact were evident indicating the involvement of volatile organic compounds in growth promotion. In conclusion, S. herbamans provides protection against the temperature-dependent damage Fol inflicts on the tomato plants by reducing disease development under 24 °C and by mitigating reduction in root morphological parameters under 28 °C in the early weeks of interaction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. herbamans inoculation stimulated tomato shoot length at both temperatures.

Treatment
inoculation with S. herbamanse1
Interactor
S. herbamansSerendipita herbamanse1symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
stimulatede1
Qualifier
across both temperaturese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with S. herbamans stimulated shoot length and enhanced the shoot and root dry mass in tomato plants across both temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. herbamans inoculation enhanced tomato shoot and root dry mass at both temperatures.

Treatment
inoculation with S. herbamanse1
Interactor
S. herbamansSerendipita herbamanse1symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root dry masse1
Direction
enhancede1
Qualifier
across both temperaturese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with S. herbamans stimulated shoot length and enhanced the shoot and root dry mass in tomato plants across both temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 24 °C, S. herbamans reduced Fusarium wilt incidence from 67% to 22%.

Treatment
S. herbamans inoculatione1
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersicie2pathogen
Second interactor
S. herbamansSerendipita herbamanse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
22%e1
Qualifier
67%e1
Comparator
Fol only treatmente1
Setting
24 °Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“S. herbamans inoculation decreased disease incidence from 67% in the Fol only treatment to 22% at lower temperatures (24 °C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–961 · show in text ↑
e2

“soil-borne pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 28 °C, disease incidence was about 41%, with no reduction from S. herbamans.

Treatment
S. herbamans inoculatione2
Interactor
S. herbamansSerendipita herbamanse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
no reductione1
Value
41%e1
Setting
28 °Ce1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“At 28 °C, disease incidence was around 41% and no reduction could be seen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“S. herbamans inoculation decreased disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fol inoculation did not affect tomato root length, area or volume at 24 °C.

Treatment
Fol inoculatione1
Interactor
Fole1pathogen
Outcome
root length, root surface area and root volumee1
Direction
not affectede1
Setting
24 °Ce1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“root morphological traits such as root length, root surface area and root volume were not affected at 24 °C but severely reduced under 28 °C upon Fol inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fol inoculation severely reduced tomato root length, area and volume at 28 °C.

Treatment
Fol inoculatione1
Interactor
Fole1pathogen
Outcome
root length, root surface area and root volumee1
Direction
severely reducede1
Setting
28 °Ce1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“root morphological traits such as root length, root surface area and root volume were not affected at 24 °C but severely reduced under 28 °C upon Fol inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With S. herbamans plus Fol at 28 °C, root morphological parameters showed no reduction.

Treatment
S. herbamans + Fole1
Interactor
Fole1pathogen
Second interactor
S. herbamansSerendipita herbamanse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root morphological parameterse1
Direction
not observede1
Setting
28 °Ce1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“A reduction of root morphological parameters was not observed in S. herbamans + Fol treated plants at 28 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1317 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature influenced root morphology more than root dry weight.

Outcome
root morphological traitse1
Direction
more influencede1
Comparator
root dry weightse1
Setting
different temperaturese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“root morphological traits appear to be more influenced by the different temperatures than root dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. herbamans promoted root traits in vitro without direct contact.

Treatment
S. herbamanse1
Interactor
S. herbamansSerendipita herbamanse1symbiont
Outcome
root traitse1
Direction
growth promotinge1
Qualifier
without direct contacte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth promoting effects of S. herbamans on root traits without direct contact were evident”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1607 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that volatile organic compounds participate in contact-free root growth promotion.

Compound
volatile organic compoundse1
Outcome
growth promotione1
Qualifier
without direct contacte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“without direct contact were evident indicating the involvement of volatile organic compounds in growth promotion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1684 · show in text ↑

Serendipita herbamans · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 15 positive, 11 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 136 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.