Paper · 2021 · Journal of Cotton Research

The effect of time and type of stress moderators on yield and yield components of cotton on conventional and double-cropping systems under saline conditions

Zeinab BORZOUYI; Mohammad ARMIN; Hamid MARVI

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Today, stress moderators are employed to mitigate crop loss due to the adverse effects of environmental stress. The current research aimed to investigate the impacts of time and stress moderator types on agro-physiological responses of cotton on conventional and double-cropping systems during 2017 and 2018 under saline conditions. A split-plot factorial experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Cultivation system [conventional (recommended planting date) and double-cropping systems (sowing after harvest of wheat)] were considered as the main plots, and stress moderator type at four levels [water control, 2 mmol·L –1 Salicylic acid (SA), 100 mmol·L –1 Glycine betaine (GB), and 100 μmol·L –1 sodium nitroprusside (SNP)] and application time (flowering and flowering + bolling stages) were regarded as subplots. Results Plant height, reproductive branch number, the number of bolls, 10-boll weight, 1 000-seed weight, biological yield, seed cotton yield, lint yield, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, total chlorophyll, sodium, potassium, and proline content were less in double-cropping system comparing with conventional system. Spraying with the stress moderators alleviated soil salinity effects on yield, yield components, and biochemical traits of cotton. SNP spraying led to maximum plant height, branch number, the number of bolls per plant, 10-boll weight and seed cotton yield. SA spraying yielded the highest 1 000-seed weight, biological yield, lint percentage and lint yield. The highest chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, and total chlorophyll content resulted from SNP spraying. Yield, yield components, and biochemical traits did not respond to the stress moderator types in double-cropping system. However, the highest chlorophyll a, carotenoids, proline content, the number of bolls per plant, and seed cotton yield resulted from SNP spraying in conventional system. No statistically significant differences were observed between spraying with SNP and SA in most studied traits. Conclusions The results suggest that the optimum cotton planting time and SNP spraying could be recommended for producing the most suitable yield under saline conditions. Highlights External application of stress modulators increases salinity stress tolerance. Spraying with sodium nitroprusside has more moderating effect. Agro-physiological response of cotton to moderators is stronger in early sowing. Maximum seed cotton yield was achieved at early sowing and spraying sodium nitroprusside. Delayed cultivation reduces cotton yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-cropping cotton had fewer plant height, reproductive branches and bolls than conventional cotton.

Treatment
double-cropping systeme1
Outcome
plant height, reproductive branch number, the number of bollse1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
conventional systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height, reproductive branch number, the number of bolls, 10-boll weight, 1 000-seed weight, biological yield, seed cotton yield, lint yield, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, total chlorophyll, sodium, potassium, and proline content were less in double-cropping system comparing with conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-cropping cotton had lower 10-boll weight, 1000-seed weight and biological yield than conventional cotton.

Treatment
double-cropping systeme1
Outcome
10-boll weight, 1 000-seed weight, biological yielde1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
conventional systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height, reproductive branch number, the number of bolls, 10-boll weight, 1 000-seed weight, biological yield, seed cotton yield, lint yield, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, total chlorophyll, sodium, potassium, and proline content were less in double-cropping system comparing with conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-cropping cotton had lower seed cotton yield and lint yield than conventional cotton.

Treatment
double-cropping systeme1
Outcome
seed cotton yield, lint yielde1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
conventional systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height, reproductive branch number, the number of bolls, 10-boll weight, 1 000-seed weight, biological yield, seed cotton yield, lint yield, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, total chlorophyll, sodium, potassium, and proline content were less in double-cropping system comparing with conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-cropping cotton had lower chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids than conventional cotton.

Treatment
double-cropping systeme1
Outcome
chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoidse1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
conventional systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height, reproductive branch number, the number of bolls, 10-boll weight, 1 000-seed weight, biological yield, seed cotton yield, lint yield, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, total chlorophyll, sodium, potassium, and proline content were less in double-cropping system comparing with conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-cropping cotton had lower total chlorophyll than conventional cotton.

Treatment
double-cropping systeme1
Outcome
total chlorophylle1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
conventional systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height, reproductive branch number, the number of bolls, 10-boll weight, 1 000-seed weight, biological yield, seed cotton yield, lint yield, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, total chlorophyll, sodium, potassium, and proline content were less in double-cropping system comparing with conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-cropping cotton had lower sodium, potassium and proline content than conventional cotton.

Treatment
double-cropping systeme1
Outcome
sodium, potassium, and proline contente1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
conventional systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height, reproductive branch number, the number of bolls, 10-boll weight, 1 000-seed weight, biological yield, seed cotton yield, lint yield, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, total chlorophyll, sodium, potassium, and proline content were less in double-cropping system comparing with conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying stress moderators alleviated soil salinity effects on cotton yield, yield components and biochemical traits.

Treatment
stress moderatorse1
Outcome
yield, yield components, and biochemical traitse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spraying with the stress moderators alleviated soil salinity effects on yield, yield components, and biochemical traits of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP spraying gave maximum plant height, branch number and number of bolls per plant.

Treatment
SNP sprayinge1
Outcome
plant height, branch number, the number of bolls per plante1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“SNP spraying led to maximum plant height, branch number, the number of bolls per plant, 10-boll weight and seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP spraying gave maximum 10-boll weight and seed cotton yield.

Treatment
SNP sprayinge1
Outcome
10-boll weight and seed cotton yielde1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“SNP spraying led to maximum plant height, branch number, the number of bolls per plant, 10-boll weight and seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA spraying gave the highest 1000-seed weight, biological yield and lint percentage.

Treatment
SA sprayinge1
Outcome
1 000-seed weight, biological yield, lint percentagee1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“SA spraying yielded the highest 1 000-seed weight, biological yield, lint percentage and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA spraying gave the highest lint yield.

Treatment
SA sprayinge1
Outcome
lint yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“SA spraying yielded the highest 1 000-seed weight, biological yield, lint percentage and lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP spraying gave the highest chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids.

Treatment
SNP sprayinge1
Outcome
chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoidse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, and total chlorophyll content resulted from SNP spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP spraying gave the highest total chlorophyll content.

Treatment
SNP sprayinge1
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, and total chlorophyll content resulted from SNP spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield, yield components and biochemical traits of double-cropping cotton did not respond to the stress moderator types.

Treatment
stress moderator typese1
Outcome
Yield, yield components, and biochemical traitse1
Setting
double-cropping systeme1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield, yield components, and biochemical traits did not respond to the stress moderator types in double-cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In conventional cotton, SNP spraying gave the highest chlorophyll a, carotenoids and proline content.

Treatment
SNP sprayinge1
Outcome
chlorophyll a, carotenoids, proline contente1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
conventional systeme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, the highest chlorophyll a, carotenoids, proline content, the number of bolls per plant, and seed cotton yield resulted from SNP spraying in conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1806–1974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In conventional cotton, SNP spraying gave the highest number of bolls per plant and seed cotton yield.

Treatment
SNP sprayinge1
Outcome
the number of bolls per plant, and seed cotton yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
conventional systeme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, the highest chlorophyll a, carotenoids, proline content, the number of bolls per plant, and seed cotton yield resulted from SNP spraying in conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1806–1974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP and SA spraying did not differ significantly in most studied traits.

Treatment
spraying with SNPe1
Outcome
most studied traitse1
Comparator
SAe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“No statistically significant differences were observed between spraying with SNP and SA in most studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2086 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend optimum cotton planting time combined with SNP spraying for the most suitable yield under saline conditions.

Outcome
optimum cotton planting time and SNP sprayinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results suggest that the optimum cotton planting time and SNP spraying could be recommended for producing the most suitable yield under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2100–2257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed cultivation reduces cotton yield.

Treatment
Delayed cultivatione1
Outcome
cotton yielde1
Direction
reducese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delayed cultivation reduces cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2583–2623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum seed cotton yield was achieved at early sowing with SNP spraying.

Treatment
early sowing and spraying sodium nitroprussidee1
Outcome
seed cotton yielde1
Direction
Maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“yield and yield components of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum seed cotton yield was achieved at early sowing and spraying sodium nitroprusside”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2493–2581 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 58 positive, 19 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

sowing time · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 66 positive, 29 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.