Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark

Foliar pathogen-induced assemblage of beneficial rhizosphere consortia increases plant defense against Setosphaeria turcica

Lin Zhu; Songhua Wang; Haiming Duan; et al.

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Foliar pathogen infection can induce the enrichment of beneficial microbial consortia in plant rhizosphere, but the mechanism for enhanced plant resistance is unclear. Methods: We investigated the effects of foliar pathogen infection on bacterial communities in maize rhizosphere using high throughput sequencing. Results: Maize plants grown in non-sterilized soils displayed stronger defense against the foliar pathogen Setosphaeria turcica than those in sterilized soils. Foliar pathogen infection further triggered the shift in the structure and composition of rhizosphere bacterial communities. The pathogen-infected plants specially promoted rhizosphere colonization of several bacterial taxa. The Pseudomonas genus increased in the rhizosphere after pathogen infection. Other bacterial genera such as Chitinophaga and Flavobacterium were also greatly enriched in the rhizosphere of pathogen-infected plants. Furthermore, the enriched bacterial species were isolated and were shown to interact synergistically to promote biofilm formation. Although both the Chitinophaga and Flavobacterium species did not induce plant defense, the Pseudomonas species markedly increased the resistance of plants against S. turcica. Furthermore, the consortium consisting of the Pseudomonas, Chitinophaga and Flavobacterium species (CONpcf) conferred long-acting disease resistance of maize plants as compared to the individual Pseudomonas species. Furthermore, the inoculation with the CONpcf significantly induced a marked increase in the levels of DIMBOA in maize leaves, indicating that the consortium-induced increases of DIMBOA levels partially contributed to enhancing disease resistance of plants. Conclusions: Foliar infection of maize plants by S. turcica specifically recruited a group of beneficial rhizosphere bacteria, which conferred enhanced plant defense against pathogen infection. This study provided important evidence that above-ground pathogen infection participated in the mediation of below-ground microbiome for regulating plant defense systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize in non-sterilized soil showed stronger defense against Setosphaeria turcica than in sterilized soil.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
non‐sterilized soilse0
Interactor
Setosphaeria turcicaExserohilum turcicume0pathogen
Outcome
defense against the foliar pathogen Setosphaeria turcicae0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
sterilized soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Exserohilum turcicum
Exserohilum turcicum · InteractorWanich Khampanich, Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize plants grown in non‐sterilized soils displayed stronger defense against the foliar pathogen Setosphaeria turcica than those in sterilized soils”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 335–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar pathogen infection shifted rhizosphere bacterial community structure and composition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Foliar pathogen infectione0
Outcome
structure and composition of rhizosphere bacterial communitiese0
Direction
shifte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar pathogen infection further triggered the shift in the structure and composition of rhizosphere bacterial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–609 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen infection promoted rhizosphere colonization by several bacterial taxa.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
pathogen‐infectede0
Outcome
rhizosphere colonization of several bacterial taxae0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pathogen‐infected plants specially promoted rhizosphere colonization of several bacterial taxa”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 611–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas abundance increased in the maize rhizosphere after pathogen infection.

Taxon
PseudomonasPseudomonase0
Treatment
pathogen infectione0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse1host
Outcome
Pseudomonas genuse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Pseudomonas genus increased in the rhizosphere after pathogen infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–786 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitinophaga was enriched in the rhizosphere of infected maize.

Taxon
ChitinophagaChitinophagae0
Treatment
pathogen‐infectede0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse1host
Outcome
Chitinophagae0
Direction
enrichede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitinophaga and Flavobacterium were also greatly enriched in the rhizosphere of pathogen‐infected plants”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 819–924 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavobacterium was enriched in the rhizosphere of infected maize.

Taxon
FlavobacteriumFlavobacteriume0
Treatment
pathogen‐infectede0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse1host
Outcome
Flavobacteriume0
Direction
enrichede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitinophaga and Flavobacterium were also greatly enriched in the rhizosphere of pathogen‐infected plants”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 819–924 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The enriched bacterial species interacted synergistically to promote biofilm formation.

Taxon
enriched bacterial speciese0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse1host
Outcome
biofilm formatione0
Direction
promotee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the enriched bacterial species were isolated and were shown to interact synergistically to promote biofilm formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitinophaga did not induce maize defense.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Chitinophagae0
Interactor
ChitinophagaChitinophagae0symbiont
Outcome
plant defensee0
Direction
did not inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the Chitinophaga and Flavobacterium species did not induce plant defense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavobacterium did not induce maize defense.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Flavobacteriume0
Interactor
FlavobacteriumFlavobacteriume0symbiont
Outcome
plant defensee0
Direction
did not inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the Chitinophaga and Flavobacterium species did not induce plant defense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas markedly increased plant resistance to S. turcica.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Pseudomonas speciese0
Interactor
S. turcicaExserohilum turcicume0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas speciesPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
resistance of plants against S. turcicae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Exserohilum turcicum
Exserohilum turcicum · InteractorWanich Khampanich, Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Pseudomonas species markedly increased the resistance of plants against S. turcica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1231 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-genus consortium conferred longer-lasting maize disease resistance than Pseudomonas alone.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
CONpcfe0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease resistancee0
Direction
long‐actinge0
Qualifier
Chitinophaga and Flavobacteriume0
Comparator
individual Pseudomonas speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“consortium consisting of the Pseudomonas, Chitinophaga and Flavobacterium species (CONpcf) conferred long‐acting disease resistance of maize plants as compared to the individual Pseudomonas species”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1250–1447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CONpcf inoculation significantly increased DIMBOA levels in maize leaves.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
maize leavese0
Treatment
inoculation with the CONpcfe0
Interactor
CONpcfe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
levels of DIMBOAe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with the CONpcf significantly induced a marked increase in the levels of DIMBOA in maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1573 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that increased DIMBOA partly contributes to consortium-enhanced disease resistance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Compound
DIMBOAe0
Outcome
disease resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“consortium‐induced increases of DIMBOA levels partially contributed to enhancing disease resistance of plants”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1595–1704 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1573 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 117 positive, 12 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.